DebugInfo: Assume an absence of ranges or high_pc on a CU means the CU is empty (devoid of code addresses)
GCC emitted these unconditionally on/before 4.4/March 2012
Clang emitted these unconditionally on/before 3.5/March 2014
This improves performance when parsing CUs (especially those using split
DWARF) that contain no code ranges (such as the mini CUs that may be
created by ThinLTO importing - though generally they should be/are
avoided, especially for Split DWARF because it produces a lot of very
small CUs, which don't scale well in a bunch of other ways too
(including size)).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@349333 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFUnit.cpp b/lib/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFUnit.cpp
index 48900e4..569512c 100644
--- a/lib/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFUnit.cpp
+++ b/lib/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFUnit.cpp
@@ -581,27 +581,6 @@
} else
WithColor::error() << "decoding address ranges: "
<< toString(CUDIERangesOrError.takeError()) << '\n';
-
- // This function is usually called if there in no .debug_aranges section
- // in order to produce a compile unit level set of address ranges that
- // is accurate. If the DIEs weren't parsed, then we don't want all dies for
- // all compile units to stay loaded when they weren't needed. So we can end
- // up parsing the DWARF and then throwing them all away to keep memory usage
- // down.
- const bool ClearDIEs = extractDIEsIfNeeded(false) > 1;
- getUnitDIE().collectChildrenAddressRanges(CURanges);
-
- // Collect address ranges from DIEs in .dwo if necessary.
- bool DWOCreated = parseDWO();
- if (DWO)
- DWO->collectAddressRanges(CURanges);
- if (DWOCreated)
- DWO.reset();
-
- // Keep memory down by clearing DIEs if this generate function
- // caused them to be parsed.
- if (ClearDIEs)
- clearDIEs(true);
}
void DWARFUnit::updateAddressDieMap(DWARFDie Die) {
diff --git a/test/DebugInfo/Inputs/dwarfdump-test.elf-x86-64 b/test/DebugInfo/Inputs/dwarfdump-test.elf-x86-64
index 455dd1c..e3afa0f 100755
--- a/test/DebugInfo/Inputs/dwarfdump-test.elf-x86-64
+++ b/test/DebugInfo/Inputs/dwarfdump-test.elf-x86-64
Binary files differ
diff --git a/test/DebugInfo/Inputs/dwarfdump-test.elf-x86-64.debuglink b/test/DebugInfo/Inputs/dwarfdump-test.elf-x86-64.debuglink
index 8c08037..9b51321 100755
--- a/test/DebugInfo/Inputs/dwarfdump-test.elf-x86-64.debuglink
+++ b/test/DebugInfo/Inputs/dwarfdump-test.elf-x86-64.debuglink
Binary files differ
diff --git a/test/DebugInfo/Inputs/llvm-symbolizer-test.elf-x86-64 b/test/DebugInfo/Inputs/llvm-symbolizer-test.elf-x86-64
index 99a448a..c952cff 100755
--- a/test/DebugInfo/Inputs/llvm-symbolizer-test.elf-x86-64
+++ b/test/DebugInfo/Inputs/llvm-symbolizer-test.elf-x86-64
Binary files differ
diff --git a/test/DebugInfo/Inputs/test-inline.o b/test/DebugInfo/Inputs/test-inline.o
index a650c91..93073a1 100644
--- a/test/DebugInfo/Inputs/test-inline.o
+++ b/test/DebugInfo/Inputs/test-inline.o
Binary files differ
diff --git a/test/DebugInfo/Inputs/test-parameters.o b/test/DebugInfo/Inputs/test-parameters.o
index 7f4b670..3b887c4 100644
--- a/test/DebugInfo/Inputs/test-parameters.o
+++ b/test/DebugInfo/Inputs/test-parameters.o
Binary files differ
diff --git a/test/DebugInfo/debuglineinfo.test b/test/DebugInfo/debuglineinfo.test
index 720ba12..651bbe5 100644
--- a/test/DebugInfo/debuglineinfo.test
+++ b/test/DebugInfo/debuglineinfo.test
@@ -1,50 +1,19 @@
RUN: llvm-rtdyld -printline %p/Inputs/test-inline.o \
-RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix TEST_INLINE
+RUN: | FileCheck %s
RUN: llvm-rtdyld -printdebugline %p/Inputs/test-inline.o \
-RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix TEST_INLINE
+RUN: | FileCheck %s
RUN: llvm-rtdyld -printline %p/Inputs/test-parameters.o \
-RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix TEST_PARAMETERS
+RUN: | FileCheck %s
RUN: llvm-rtdyld -printdebugline %p/Inputs/test-parameters.o \
-RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix TEST_PARAMETERS
+RUN: | FileCheck %s
; This test verifies that relocations are correctly applied to the
; .debug_line section and exercises DIContext::getLineInfoForAddressRange().
-; If relocations are not applied the first two functions will be reported as
-; both starting at address zero in the; line number table.
-TEST_INLINE: Function: _Z15test_parametersPfPA2_dR11char_structPPitm, Size = 170
-TEST_INLINE-NEXT: Line info @ 0: test-inline.cpp, line:33
-TEST_INLINE-NEXT: Line info @ 35: test-inline.cpp, line:34
-TEST_INLINE-NEXT: Line info @ 165: test-inline.cpp, line:35
-TEST_INLINE-NEXT: Function: _Z3foov, Size = 3
-TEST_INLINE-NEXT: Line info @ 0: test-inline.cpp, line:28
-TEST_INLINE-NEXT: Line info @ 2: test-inline.cpp, line:29
-TEST_INLINE-NEXT: Function: main, Size = 146
-TEST_INLINE-NEXT: Line info @ 0: test-inline.cpp, line:39
-TEST_INLINE-NEXT: Line info @ 21: test-inline.cpp, line:41
-TEST_INLINE-NEXT: Line info @ 39: test-inline.cpp, line:42
-TEST_INLINE-NEXT: Line info @ 60: test-inline.cpp, line:44
-TEST_INLINE-NEXT: Line info @ 80: test-inline.cpp, line:48
-TEST_INLINE-NEXT: Line info @ 90: test-inline.cpp, line:45
-TEST_INLINE-NEXT: Line info @ 95: test-inline.cpp, line:46
-TEST_INLINE-NEXT: Line info @ 114: test-inline.cpp, line:48
-TEST_INLINE-NEXT: Line info @ 141: test-inline.cpp, line:49
-; This test checks the case where all code is in a single section.
-TEST_PARAMETERS: Function: _Z15test_parametersPfPA2_dR11char_structPPitm, Size = 170
-TEST_PARAMETERS-NEXT: Line info @ 0: test-parameters.cpp, line:33
-TEST_PARAMETERS-NEXT: Line info @ 35: test-parameters.cpp, line:34
-TEST_PARAMETERS-NEXT: Line info @ 165: test-parameters.cpp, line:35
-TEST_PARAMETERS-NEXT: Function: _Z3foov, Size = 3
-TEST_PARAMETERS-NEXT: Line info @ 0: test-parameters.cpp, line:28
-TEST_PARAMETERS-NEXT: Line info @ 2: test-parameters.cpp, line:29
-TEST_PARAMETERS-NEXT: Function: main, Size = 146
-TEST_PARAMETERS-NEXT: Line info @ 0: test-parameters.cpp, line:39
-TEST_PARAMETERS-NEXT: Line info @ 21: test-parameters.cpp, line:41
-TEST_PARAMETERS-NEXT: Line info @ 39: test-parameters.cpp, line:42
-TEST_PARAMETERS-NEXT: Line info @ 60: test-parameters.cpp, line:44
-TEST_PARAMETERS-NEXT: Line info @ 80: test-parameters.cpp, line:48
-TEST_PARAMETERS-NEXT: Line info @ 90: test-parameters.cpp, line:45
-TEST_PARAMETERS-NEXT: Line info @ 95: test-parameters.cpp, line:46
-TEST_PARAMETERS-NEXT: Line info @ 114: test-parameters.cpp, line:48
-TEST_PARAMETERS-NEXT: Line info @ 141: test-parameters.cpp, line:49
-
+CHECK: Function: _Z2f1v, Size = 6
+CHECK-NEXT: Line info @ 0: test-inline.cpp, line:1
+CHECK-NEXT: Line info @ 4: test-inline.cpp, line:1
+CHECK-NEXT: Function: _Z2f2v, Size = 11
+CHECK-NEXT: Line info @ 0: test-inline.cpp, line:2
+CHECK-NEXT: Line info @ 4: test-inline.cpp, line:2
+CHECK-NEXT: Line info @ 9: test-inline.cpp, line:2
diff --git a/test/DebugInfo/llvm-symbolizer-split-dwarf-no-skel-address.test b/test/DebugInfo/llvm-symbolizer-split-dwarf-no-skel-address.test
index b6c9ccc..1b8da86 100644
--- a/test/DebugInfo/llvm-symbolizer-split-dwarf-no-skel-address.test
+++ b/test/DebugInfo/llvm-symbolizer-split-dwarf-no-skel-address.test
@@ -15,5 +15,8 @@
high/low pc (& update the CU length field and abbrev to match) & then
compile/objcopy to make the .o and .dwo.
-CHECK: _Z2f2v
-CHECK: test.cpp:2:51
+Ensure that the f2 inlined frame is not included - it's inefficient to have to
+go and load all the debug info and search for the address ranges, so assume
+that a lack of ranges on the CU means the CU covers no addresses.
+
+CHECK-NOT: _Z2f2v
diff --git a/test/DebugInfo/llvm-symbolizer.test b/test/DebugInfo/llvm-symbolizer.test
index a6a1549..5a5e06c 100644
--- a/test/DebugInfo/llvm-symbolizer.test
+++ b/test/DebugInfo/llvm-symbolizer.test
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
RUN: rm -rf %t
RUN: mkdir -p %t
-RUN: echo "%p/Inputs/dwarfdump-test.elf-x86-64 0x400559" > %t.input
-RUN: echo "%p/Inputs/dwarfdump-test.elf-x86-64.debuglink 0x400559" >> %t.input
-RUN: echo "%p/Inputs/dwarfdump-test.elf-x86-64 0x400436" >> %t.input
-RUN: echo "%p/Inputs/dwarfdump-test.elf-x86-64 0x400528" >> %t.input
-RUN: echo "%p/Inputs/dwarfdump-test.elf-x86-64 0x400586" >> %t.input
+RUN: echo "%p/Inputs/dwarfdump-test.elf-x86-64 0x40113f" > %t.input
+RUN: echo "%p/Inputs/dwarfdump-test.elf-x86-64.debuglink 0x40113f" >> %t.input
+RUN: echo "%p/Inputs/dwarfdump-test.elf-x86-64 0x401020" >> %t.input
+RUN: echo "%p/Inputs/dwarfdump-test.elf-x86-64 0x40110e" >> %t.input
+RUN: echo "%p/Inputs/dwarfdump-test.elf-x86-64 0x401160" >> %t.input
RUN: echo "%p/Inputs/dwarfdump-test2.elf-x86-64 0x4004e8" >> %t.input
RUN: echo "%p/Inputs/dwarfdump-test2.elf-x86-64 0x4004f4" >> %t.input
RUN: echo "%p/Inputs/dwarfdump-test4.elf-x86-64 0x62c" >> %t.input
@@ -181,8 +181,8 @@
UNKNOWN-ARCH: ??
UNKNOWN-ARCH-NOT: main
-RUN: echo "0x400559" > %t.input4
-RUN: echo "0x400436" >> %t.input4
+RUN: echo "0x40113f" > %t.input4
+RUN: echo "0x401020" >> %t.input4
RUN: llvm-symbolizer --obj %p/Inputs/dwarfdump-test.elf-x86-64 < %t.input4 \
RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=BINARY
@@ -190,9 +190,9 @@
BINARY-NEXT: /tmp/dbginfo{{[/\\]}}dwarfdump-test.cc:16
BINARY: _start
-RUN: echo "0x400720" > %t.input5
-RUN: echo "0x4004a0" >> %t.input5
-RUN: echo "0x4006f0" >> %t.input5
+RUN: echo "0x401140" > %t.input5
+RUN: echo "0x401020" >> %t.input5
+RUN: echo "0x401120" >> %t.input5
RUN: llvm-symbolizer --obj %p/Inputs/llvm-symbolizer-test.elf-x86-64 < %t.input5 \
RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=BINARY_C
