blob: 1f8ef5ee6eae58a1454e05f5cf2e3e309154fa7b [file] [log] [blame]
//===- AArch64SpeculationHardening.cpp - Harden Against Missspeculation --===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file contains a pass to insert code to mitigate against side channel
// vulnerabilities that may happen under control flow miss-speculation.
//
// The pass implements tracking of control flow miss-speculation into a "taint"
// register. That taint register can then be used to mask off registers with
// sensitive data when executing under miss-speculation, a.k.a. "transient
// execution".
// This pass is aimed at mitigating against SpectreV1-style vulnarabilities.
//
// At the moment, it implements the tracking of miss-speculation of control
// flow into a taint register, but doesn't implement a mechanism yet to then
// use that taint register to mask of vulnerable data in registers (something
// for a follow-on improvement). Possible strategies to mask out vulnerable
// data that can be implemented on top of this are:
// - speculative load hardening to automatically mask of data loaded
// in registers.
// - using intrinsics to mask of data in registers as indicated by the
// programmer (see https://lwn.net/Articles/759423/).
//
// For AArch64, the following implementation choices are made below.
// Some of these are different than the implementation choices made in
// the similar pass implemented in X86SpeculativeLoadHardening.cpp, as
// the instruction set characteristics result in different trade-offs.
// - The speculation hardening is done after register allocation. With a
// relative abundance of registers, one register is reserved (X16) to be
// the taint register. X16 is expected to not clash with other register
// reservation mechanisms with very high probability because:
// . The AArch64 ABI doesn't guarantee X16 to be retained across any call.
// . The only way to request X16 to be used as a programmer is through
// inline assembly. In the rare case a function explicitly demands to
// use X16/W16, this pass falls back to hardening against speculation
// by inserting a DSB SYS/ISB barrier pair which will prevent control
// flow speculation.
// - It is easy to insert mask operations at this late stage as we have
// mask operations available that don't set flags.
// - The taint variable contains all-ones when no miss-speculation is detected,
// and contains all-zeros when miss-speculation is detected. Therefore, when
// masking, an AND instruction (which only changes the register to be masked,
// no other side effects) can easily be inserted anywhere that's needed.
// - The tracking of miss-speculation is done by using a data-flow conditional
// select instruction (CSEL) to evaluate the flags that were also used to
// make conditional branch direction decisions. Speculation of the CSEL
// instruction can be limited with a CSDB instruction - so the combination of
// CSEL + a later CSDB gives the guarantee that the flags as used in the CSEL
// aren't speculated. When conditional branch direction gets miss-speculated,
// the semantics of the inserted CSEL instruction is such that the taint
// register will contain all zero bits.
// One key requirement for this to work is that the conditional branch is
// followed by an execution of the CSEL instruction, where the CSEL
// instruction needs to use the same flags status as the conditional branch.
// This means that the conditional branches must not be implemented as one
// of the AArch64 conditional branches that do not use the flags as input
// (CB(N)Z and TB(N)Z). This is implemented by ensuring in the instruction
// selectors to not produce these instructions when speculation hardening
// is enabled. This pass will assert if it does encounter such an instruction.
// - On function call boundaries, the miss-speculation state is transferred from
// the taint register X16 to be encoded in the SP register as value 0.
//
// Future extensions/improvements could be:
// - Implement this functionality using full speculation barriers, akin to the
// x86-slh-lfence option. This may be more useful for the intrinsics-based
// approach than for the SLH approach to masking.
// Note that this pass already inserts the full speculation barriers if the
// function for some niche reason makes use of X16/W16.
// - no indirect branch misprediction gets protected/instrumented; but this
// could be done for some indirect branches, such as switch jump tables.
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "AArch64InstrInfo.h"
#include "AArch64Subtarget.h"
#include "Utils/AArch64BaseInfo.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/BitVector.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineBasicBlock.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunction.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstr.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstrBuilder.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineOperand.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
#include "llvm/IR/DebugLoc.h"
#include "llvm/Pass.h"
#include "llvm/Support/CodeGen.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetMachine.h"
#include <cassert>
using namespace llvm;
#define DEBUG_TYPE "aarch64-speculation-hardening"
#define AARCH64_SPECULATION_HARDENING_NAME "AArch64 speculation hardening pass"
namespace {
class AArch64SpeculationHardening : public MachineFunctionPass {
public:
const TargetInstrInfo *TII;
const TargetRegisterInfo *TRI;
static char ID;
AArch64SpeculationHardening() : MachineFunctionPass(ID) {
initializeAArch64SpeculationHardeningPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
}
bool runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &Fn) override;
StringRef getPassName() const override {
return AARCH64_SPECULATION_HARDENING_NAME;
}
private:
unsigned MisspeculatingTaintReg;
bool UseControlFlowSpeculationBarrier;
bool functionUsesHardeningRegister(MachineFunction &MF) const;
bool instrumentControlFlow(MachineBasicBlock &MBB);
bool endsWithCondControlFlow(MachineBasicBlock &MBB, MachineBasicBlock *&TBB,
MachineBasicBlock *&FBB,
AArch64CC::CondCode &CondCode) const;
void insertTrackingCode(MachineBasicBlock &SplitEdgeBB,
AArch64CC::CondCode &CondCode, DebugLoc DL) const;
void insertSPToRegTaintPropagation(MachineBasicBlock *MBB,
MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI) const;
void insertRegToSPTaintPropagation(MachineBasicBlock *MBB,
MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI,
unsigned TmpReg) const;
};
} // end anonymous namespace
char AArch64SpeculationHardening::ID = 0;
INITIALIZE_PASS(AArch64SpeculationHardening, "aarch64-speculation-hardening",
AARCH64_SPECULATION_HARDENING_NAME, false, false)
bool AArch64SpeculationHardening::endsWithCondControlFlow(
MachineBasicBlock &MBB, MachineBasicBlock *&TBB, MachineBasicBlock *&FBB,
AArch64CC::CondCode &CondCode) const {
SmallVector<MachineOperand, 1> analyzeBranchCondCode;
if (TII->analyzeBranch(MBB, TBB, FBB, analyzeBranchCondCode, false))
return false;
// Ignore if the BB ends in an unconditional branch/fall-through.
if (analyzeBranchCondCode.empty())
return false;
// If the BB ends with a single conditional branch, FBB will be set to
// nullptr (see API docs for TII->analyzeBranch). For the rest of the
// analysis we want the FBB block to be set always.
assert(TBB != nullptr);
if (FBB == nullptr)
FBB = MBB.getFallThrough();
// If both the true and the false condition jump to the same basic block,
// there isn't need for any protection - whether the branch is speculated
// correctly or not, we end up executing the architecturally correct code.
if (TBB == FBB)
return false;
assert(MBB.succ_size() == 2);
// translate analyzeBranchCondCode to CondCode.
assert(analyzeBranchCondCode.size() == 1 && "unknown Cond array format");
CondCode = AArch64CC::CondCode(analyzeBranchCondCode[0].getImm());
return true;
}
void AArch64SpeculationHardening::insertTrackingCode(
MachineBasicBlock &SplitEdgeBB, AArch64CC::CondCode &CondCode,
DebugLoc DL) const {
if (UseControlFlowSpeculationBarrier) {
// insert full control flow speculation barrier (DSB SYS + ISB)
BuildMI(SplitEdgeBB, SplitEdgeBB.begin(), DL, TII->get(AArch64::ISB))
.addImm(0xf);
BuildMI(SplitEdgeBB, SplitEdgeBB.begin(), DL, TII->get(AArch64::DSB))
.addImm(0xf);
} else {
BuildMI(SplitEdgeBB, SplitEdgeBB.begin(), DL, TII->get(AArch64::CSELXr))
.addDef(MisspeculatingTaintReg)
.addUse(MisspeculatingTaintReg)
.addUse(AArch64::XZR)
.addImm(CondCode);
SplitEdgeBB.addLiveIn(AArch64::NZCV);
}
}
bool AArch64SpeculationHardening::instrumentControlFlow(
MachineBasicBlock &MBB) {
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Instrument control flow tracking on MBB: " << MBB);
bool Modified = false;
MachineBasicBlock *TBB = nullptr;
MachineBasicBlock *FBB = nullptr;
AArch64CC::CondCode CondCode;
if (!endsWithCondControlFlow(MBB, TBB, FBB, CondCode)) {
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "... doesn't end with CondControlFlow\n");
} else {
// Now insert:
// "CSEL MisSpeculatingR, MisSpeculatingR, XZR, cond" on the True edge and
// "CSEL MisSpeculatingR, MisSpeculatingR, XZR, Invertcond" on the False
// edge.
AArch64CC::CondCode InvCondCode = AArch64CC::getInvertedCondCode(CondCode);
MachineBasicBlock *SplitEdgeTBB = MBB.SplitCriticalEdge(TBB, *this);
MachineBasicBlock *SplitEdgeFBB = MBB.SplitCriticalEdge(FBB, *this);
assert(SplitEdgeTBB != nullptr);
assert(SplitEdgeFBB != nullptr);
DebugLoc DL;
if (MBB.instr_end() != MBB.instr_begin())
DL = (--MBB.instr_end())->getDebugLoc();
insertTrackingCode(*SplitEdgeTBB, CondCode, DL);
insertTrackingCode(*SplitEdgeFBB, InvCondCode, DL);
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "SplitEdgeTBB: " << *SplitEdgeTBB << "\n");
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "SplitEdgeFBB: " << *SplitEdgeFBB << "\n");
Modified = true;
}
// Perform correct code generation around function calls and before returns.
{
SmallVector<MachineInstr *, 4> ReturnInstructions;
SmallVector<MachineInstr *, 4> CallInstructions;
for (MachineInstr &MI : MBB) {
if (MI.isReturn())
ReturnInstructions.push_back(&MI);
else if (MI.isCall())
CallInstructions.push_back(&MI);
}
Modified |=
(ReturnInstructions.size() > 0) || (CallInstructions.size() > 0);
for (MachineInstr *Return : ReturnInstructions)
insertRegToSPTaintPropagation(Return->getParent(), Return, AArch64::X17);
for (MachineInstr *Call : CallInstructions) {
// Just after the call:
MachineBasicBlock::iterator i = Call;
i++;
insertSPToRegTaintPropagation(Call->getParent(), i);
// Just before the call:
insertRegToSPTaintPropagation(Call->getParent(), Call, AArch64::X17);
}
}
return Modified;
}
void AArch64SpeculationHardening::insertSPToRegTaintPropagation(
MachineBasicBlock *MBB, MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI) const {
// If full control flow speculation barriers are used, emit a control flow
// barrier to block potential miss-speculation in flight coming in to this
// function.
if (UseControlFlowSpeculationBarrier) {
// insert full control flow speculation barrier (DSB SYS + ISB)
BuildMI(*MBB, MBBI, DebugLoc(), TII->get(AArch64::DSB)).addImm(0xf);
BuildMI(*MBB, MBBI, DebugLoc(), TII->get(AArch64::ISB)).addImm(0xf);
return;
}
// CMP SP, #0 === SUBS xzr, SP, #0
BuildMI(*MBB, MBBI, DebugLoc(), TII->get(AArch64::SUBSXri))
.addDef(AArch64::XZR)
.addUse(AArch64::SP)
.addImm(0)
.addImm(0); // no shift
// CSETM x16, NE === CSINV x16, xzr, xzr, EQ
BuildMI(*MBB, MBBI, DebugLoc(), TII->get(AArch64::CSINVXr))
.addDef(MisspeculatingTaintReg)
.addUse(AArch64::XZR)
.addUse(AArch64::XZR)
.addImm(AArch64CC::EQ);
}
void AArch64SpeculationHardening::insertRegToSPTaintPropagation(
MachineBasicBlock *MBB, MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI,
unsigned TmpReg) const {
// If full control flow speculation barriers are used, there will not be
// miss-speculation when returning from this function, and therefore, also
// no need to encode potential miss-speculation into the stack pointer.
if (UseControlFlowSpeculationBarrier)
return;
// mov Xtmp, SP === ADD Xtmp, SP, #0
BuildMI(*MBB, MBBI, DebugLoc(), TII->get(AArch64::ADDXri))
.addDef(TmpReg)
.addUse(AArch64::SP)
.addImm(0)
.addImm(0); // no shift
// and Xtmp, Xtmp, TaintReg === AND Xtmp, Xtmp, TaintReg, #0
BuildMI(*MBB, MBBI, DebugLoc(), TII->get(AArch64::ANDXrs))
.addDef(TmpReg, RegState::Renamable)
.addUse(TmpReg, RegState::Kill | RegState::Renamable)
.addUse(MisspeculatingTaintReg, RegState::Kill)
.addImm(0);
// mov SP, Xtmp === ADD SP, Xtmp, #0
BuildMI(*MBB, MBBI, DebugLoc(), TII->get(AArch64::ADDXri))
.addDef(AArch64::SP)
.addUse(TmpReg, RegState::Kill)
.addImm(0)
.addImm(0); // no shift
}
bool AArch64SpeculationHardening::functionUsesHardeningRegister(
MachineFunction &MF) const {
for (MachineBasicBlock &MBB : MF) {
for (MachineInstr &MI : MBB) {
// treat function calls specially, as the hardening register does not
// need to remain live across function calls.
if (MI.isCall())
continue;
if (MI.readsRegister(MisspeculatingTaintReg, TRI) ||
MI.modifiesRegister(MisspeculatingTaintReg, TRI))
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
bool AArch64SpeculationHardening::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) {
if (!MF.getFunction().hasFnAttribute(Attribute::SpeculativeLoadHardening))
return false;
MisspeculatingTaintReg = AArch64::X16;
TII = MF.getSubtarget().getInstrInfo();
TRI = MF.getSubtarget().getRegisterInfo();
bool Modified = false;
UseControlFlowSpeculationBarrier = functionUsesHardeningRegister(MF);
// Instrument control flow speculation tracking, if requested.
LLVM_DEBUG(
dbgs()
<< "***** AArch64SpeculationHardening - track control flow *****\n");
// 1. Add instrumentation code to function entry and exits.
SmallVector<MachineBasicBlock *, 2> EntryBlocks;
EntryBlocks.push_back(&MF.front());
for (const LandingPadInfo &LPI : MF.getLandingPads())
EntryBlocks.push_back(LPI.LandingPadBlock);
for (auto Entry : EntryBlocks)
insertSPToRegTaintPropagation(
Entry, Entry->SkipPHIsLabelsAndDebug(Entry->begin()));
// 2. Add instrumentation code to every basic block.
for (auto &MBB : MF)
Modified |= instrumentControlFlow(MBB);
return Modified;
}
/// \brief Returns an instance of the pseudo instruction expansion pass.
FunctionPass *llvm::createAArch64SpeculationHardeningPass() {
return new AArch64SpeculationHardening();
}