| //===- llvm/Analysis/LoopUnrollAnalyzer.h - Loop Unroll Analyzer-*- C++ -*-===// |
| // |
| // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. |
| // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. |
| // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception |
| // |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| // |
| // This file implements UnrolledInstAnalyzer class. It's used for predicting |
| // potential effects that loop unrolling might have, such as enabling constant |
| // propagation and other optimizations. |
| // |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| |
| #ifndef LLVM_ANALYSIS_LOOPUNROLLANALYZER_H |
| #define LLVM_ANALYSIS_LOOPUNROLLANALYZER_H |
| |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.h" |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpressions.h" |
| #include "llvm/IR/InstVisitor.h" |
| |
| // This class is used to get an estimate of the optimization effects that we |
| // could get from complete loop unrolling. It comes from the fact that some |
| // loads might be replaced with concrete constant values and that could trigger |
| // a chain of instruction simplifications. |
| // |
| // E.g. we might have: |
| // int a[] = {0, 1, 0}; |
| // v = 0; |
| // for (i = 0; i < 3; i ++) |
| // v += b[i]*a[i]; |
| // If we completely unroll the loop, we would get: |
| // v = b[0]*a[0] + b[1]*a[1] + b[2]*a[2] |
| // Which then will be simplified to: |
| // v = b[0]* 0 + b[1]* 1 + b[2]* 0 |
| // And finally: |
| // v = b[1] |
| namespace llvm { |
| class UnrolledInstAnalyzer : private InstVisitor<UnrolledInstAnalyzer, bool> { |
| typedef InstVisitor<UnrolledInstAnalyzer, bool> Base; |
| friend class InstVisitor<UnrolledInstAnalyzer, bool>; |
| struct SimplifiedAddress { |
| Value *Base = nullptr; |
| ConstantInt *Offset = nullptr; |
| }; |
| |
| public: |
| UnrolledInstAnalyzer(unsigned Iteration, |
| DenseMap<Value *, Constant *> &SimplifiedValues, |
| ScalarEvolution &SE, const Loop *L) |
| : SimplifiedValues(SimplifiedValues), SE(SE), L(L) { |
| IterationNumber = SE.getConstant(APInt(64, Iteration)); |
| } |
| |
| // Allow access to the initial visit method. |
| using Base::visit; |
| |
| private: |
| /// A cache of pointer bases and constant-folded offsets corresponding |
| /// to GEP (or derived from GEP) instructions. |
| /// |
| /// In order to find the base pointer one needs to perform non-trivial |
| /// traversal of the corresponding SCEV expression, so it's good to have the |
| /// results saved. |
| DenseMap<Value *, SimplifiedAddress> SimplifiedAddresses; |
| |
| /// SCEV expression corresponding to number of currently simulated |
| /// iteration. |
| const SCEV *IterationNumber; |
| |
| /// A Value->Constant map for keeping values that we managed to |
| /// constant-fold on the given iteration. |
| /// |
| /// While we walk the loop instructions, we build up and maintain a mapping |
| /// of simplified values specific to this iteration. The idea is to propagate |
| /// any special information we have about loads that can be replaced with |
| /// constants after complete unrolling, and account for likely simplifications |
| /// post-unrolling. |
| DenseMap<Value *, Constant *> &SimplifiedValues; |
| |
| ScalarEvolution &SE; |
| const Loop *L; |
| |
| bool simplifyInstWithSCEV(Instruction *I); |
| |
| bool visitInstruction(Instruction &I) { return simplifyInstWithSCEV(&I); } |
| bool visitBinaryOperator(BinaryOperator &I); |
| bool visitLoad(LoadInst &I); |
| bool visitCastInst(CastInst &I); |
| bool visitCmpInst(CmpInst &I); |
| bool visitPHINode(PHINode &PN); |
| }; |
| } |
| #endif |