blob: 751e2475f220c2a21b40f6e03fa7f1488d7c1569 [file] [log] [blame]
; RUN: opt < %s -passes=sroa -S | FileCheck %s
target datalayout = "e-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-n32:64-S128"
target triple = "wasm32-unknown-unknown"
%struct.foo = type { i32 }
declare i32 @__gxx_wasm_personality_v0(...)
declare void @foo()
; Tests if the SROA pass correctly bails out on rewriting PHIs in a catchswitch
; BB.
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_phi_catchswitch
define void @test_phi_catchswitch() personality ptr @__gxx_wasm_personality_v0 {
entry:
; CHECK: alloca
%tmp = alloca %struct.foo, align 4
invoke void @foo()
to label %bb3 unwind label %bb10
bb3: ; preds = %entry
invoke void @foo()
to label %bb9 unwind label %catch.dispatch
catch.dispatch: ; preds = %bb3
; While rewriting the alloca in the entry BB, the SROA pass tries to insert a
; non-PHI instruction in this BB by calling getFirstInsertionPt(), which is
; not possible in a catchswitch BB. This test checks if we correctly bail out
; on these cases.
%tmp5 = phi ptr [ %tmp, %bb3 ]
%tmp6 = catchswitch within none [label %catch.start] unwind label %bb10
catch.start: ; preds = %catch.dispatch
%tmp8 = catchpad within %tmp6 [ptr null]
unreachable
bb9: ; preds = %bb3
unreachable
bb10: ; preds = %catch.dispatch, %entry
%tmp11 = phi ptr [ %tmp, %entry ], [ %tmp5, %catch.dispatch ]
%tmp12 = cleanuppad within none []
store i32 0, ptr %tmp11, align 4
unreachable
}