| // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++1z -ast-print %s > %t |
| // RUN: FileCheck < %t %s -check-prefix=CHECK1 |
| // RUN: FileCheck < %t %s -check-prefix=CHECK2 |
| // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++1z -ast-dump %s | FileCheck --check-prefix=DUMP %s |
| |
| template <int X, typename Y, int Z = 5> |
| struct foo { |
| int constant; |
| foo() {} |
| Y getSum() { return Y(X + Z); } |
| }; |
| |
| template <int A, typename B> |
| B bar() { |
| return B(A); |
| } |
| |
| void baz() { |
| int x = bar<5, int>(); |
| int y = foo<5, int>().getSum(); |
| double z = foo<2, double, 3>().getSum(); |
| } |
| |
| // Template definition - foo |
| // CHECK1: template <int X, typename Y, int Z = 5> struct foo { |
| // CHECK2: template <int X, typename Y, int Z = 5> struct foo { |
| |
| // Template instantiation - foo |
| // Since the order of instantiation may vary during runs, run FileCheck twice |
| // to make sure each instantiation is in the correct spot. |
| // CHECK1: template<> struct foo<5, int, 5> { |
| // CHECK2: template<> struct foo<2, double, 3> { |
| |
| // Template definition - bar |
| // CHECK1: template <int A, typename B> B bar() |
| // CHECK2: template <int A, typename B> B bar() |
| |
| // Template instantiation - bar |
| // CHECK1: template<> int bar<5, int>() |
| // CHECK2: template<> int bar<5, int>() |
| |
| // CHECK1-LABEL: template <typename ...T> struct A { |
| // CHECK1-NEXT: template <T ...x[3]> struct B { |
| template <typename ...T> struct A { |
| template <T ...x[3]> struct B {}; |
| }; |
| |
| // CHECK1-LABEL: template <typename ...T> void f(T ...[3]) { |
| // CHECK1-NEXT: A<T[3]...> a; |
| template <typename ...T> void f(T ...[3]) { |
| A<T[3]...> a; |
| } |
| |
| namespace test2 { |
| void func(int); |
| void func(float); |
| template<typename T> |
| void tmpl() { |
| func(T()); |
| } |
| |
| // DUMP: UnresolvedLookupExpr {{.*}} <col:3> '<overloaded function type>' lvalue (ADL) = 'func' |
| } |
| |
| namespace test3 { |
| template<typename T> struct A {}; |
| template<typename T> A(T) -> A<int>; |
| // CHECK1: template <typename T> A(T) -> A<int>; |
| } |
| |
| namespace test4 { |
| template <unsigned X, auto A> |
| struct foo { |
| static void fn(); |
| }; |
| |
| // Prints using an "integral" template argument. Test that this correctly |
| // includes the type for the auto argument and omits it for the fixed |
| // type/unsigned argument (see |
| // TemplateParameterList::shouldIncludeTypeForArgument) |
| // CHECK1: {{^ }}template<> struct foo<0, 0L> { |
| // CHECK1: {{^ }}void test(){{ }}{ |
| // CHECK1: {{^ }}foo<0, 0 + 0L>::fn(); |
| void test() { |
| foo<0, 0 + 0L>::fn(); |
| } |
| |
| // Prints using an "expression" template argument. This renders based on the way |
| // the user wrote the arguments (including that + expression) - so it's not |
| // powered by the shouldIncludeTypeForArgument functionality. |
| // Not sure if this it's intentional that these two specializations are rendered |
| // differently in this way. |
| // CHECK1: {{^ }}template<> struct foo<1, 0 + 0L> { |
| template struct foo<1, 0 + 0L>; |
| } |
| |
| namespace test5 { |
| template<long> void f() {} |
| void (*p)() = f<0>; |
| template<unsigned = 0> void f() {} |
| void (*q)() = f<>; |
| // Not perfect - this code in the dump would be ambiguous, but it's the best we |
| // can do to differentiate these two implicit specializations. |
| // CHECK1: template<> void f<0L>() |
| // CHECK1: template<> void f<0U>() |
| } |