| /* RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c89 -verify -Wreserved-macro-identifier %s |
| RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c99 -verify -Wreserved-macro-identifier %s |
| RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c11 -verify -Wreserved-macro-identifier %s |
| RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c17 -verify -Wreserved-macro-identifier %s |
| RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c2x -verify -Wreserved-macro-identifier %s |
| */ |
| |
| /* WG14 DR491: partial |
| * Concern with Keywords that Match Reserved Identifiers |
| * |
| * Claiming this as partial because we do not reject code using a reserved |
| * identifier, but our reserved identifier code incorrectly identifies some |
| * keywords as reserved identifiers for macro names, but not others. |
| */ |
| |
| #define const const |
| #define int int |
| #define restrict restrict |
| |
| /* FIXME: none of these should diagnose the macro name as a reserved |
| * identifier per C2x 6.4.2p7 (similar wording existed in earlier standard |
| * versions). |
| */ |
| #define _Static_assert _Static_assert /* expected-warning {{macro name is a reserved identifier}} */ |
| #define _Alignof(x) _Alignof(x) /* expected-warning {{macro name is a reserved identifier}} */ |
| #define _Bool _Bool /* expected-warning {{macro name is a reserved identifier}} */ |
| #define __has_c_attribute __has_c_attribute /* expected-warning {{macro name is a reserved identifier}} |
| expected-warning {{redefining builtin macro}} |
| */ |
| #define __restrict__ __restrict__ /* expected-warning {{macro name is a reserved identifier}} */ |
