| ; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py | |
| ; RUN: opt -passes=jump-threading -S < %s | FileCheck %s | |
| declare void @f() | |
| define void @test1(i1 %cond, i1 %dummycond) { | |
| ; CHECK-LABEL: @test1( | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[COND:%.*]], label [[A:%.*]], label [[B:%.*]] | |
| ; CHECK: A: | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[DUMMYCOND:%.*]], label [[REACHABLE:%.*]], label [[DUMMY:%.*]] | |
| ; CHECK: B: | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[DUMMYCOND]], label [[REACHABLE]], label [[DUMMY]] | |
| ; CHECK: REACHABLE: | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: call void @f() | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: ret void | |
| ; CHECK: DUMMY: | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: ret void | |
| ; | |
| br i1 %cond, label %A, label %B | |
| A: | |
| br i1 %dummycond, label %A2, label %DUMMY | |
| A2: | |
| %cond.fr = freeze i1 %cond | |
| br i1 %cond.fr, label %REACHABLE, label %UNREACHABLE | |
| B: | |
| br i1 %dummycond, label %B2, label %DUMMY | |
| B2: | |
| %cond.fr2 = freeze i1 %cond | |
| br i1 %cond.fr2, label %UNREACHABLE, label %REACHABLE | |
| REACHABLE: | |
| call void @f() | |
| ret void | |
| UNREACHABLE: | |
| ret void | |
| DUMMY: | |
| ret void | |
| } | |
| define void @test2(i1 %cond, i1 %dummycond) { | |
| ; CHECK-LABEL: @test2( | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: [[COND_FR0:%.*]] = freeze i1 [[COND:%.*]] | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[COND_FR0]], label [[A:%.*]], label [[B:%.*]] | |
| ; CHECK: A: | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[DUMMYCOND:%.*]], label [[REACHABLE:%.*]], label [[DUMMY:%.*]] | |
| ; CHECK: B: | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[DUMMYCOND]], label [[REACHABLE]], label [[DUMMY]] | |
| ; CHECK: REACHABLE: | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: call void @f() | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: ret void | |
| ; CHECK: DUMMY: | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: ret void | |
| ; | |
| %cond.fr0 = freeze i1 %cond | |
| br i1 %cond.fr0, label %A, label %B | |
| A: | |
| br i1 %dummycond, label %A2, label %DUMMY | |
| A2: | |
| %cond.fr = freeze i1 %cond | |
| br i1 %cond.fr, label %REACHABLE, label %UNREACHABLE | |
| B: | |
| br i1 %dummycond, label %B2, label %DUMMY | |
| B2: | |
| %cond.fr2 = freeze i1 %cond | |
| br i1 %cond.fr2, label %UNREACHABLE, label %REACHABLE | |
| REACHABLE: | |
| call void @f() | |
| ret void | |
| UNREACHABLE: | |
| ret void | |
| DUMMY: | |
| ret void | |
| } | |
| ; In this specific example, it is still correct to fold %cond.fr into true. | |
| ; This case is unsupported because it is unclear what is the result of | |
| ; isImpliedCondition if LHS is poison or undef. | |
| ; If isImpliedCondition(poison, any value) is true, | |
| ; isImpliedCondition(and true, poison, false) is also true because 'and' propagates poison. | |
| ; However, freeze(and true, poison) does not imply false because the former can | |
| ; be frozen to true. Therefore, we cannot look through the argument of freeze (%cond.fr0) | |
| ; in general under this isImpliedCondition definition. | |
| define void @and_noopt(i32 %x, i1 %cond2, i1 %dummycond) { | |
| ; CHECK-LABEL: @and_noopt( | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: [[COND1:%.*]] = icmp slt i32 0, [[X:%.*]] | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: [[COND:%.*]] = and i1 [[COND1]], [[COND2:%.*]] | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: [[COND_FR0:%.*]] = freeze i1 [[COND]] | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[COND_FR0]], label [[A:%.*]], label [[B:%.*]] | |
| ; CHECK: A: | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[DUMMYCOND:%.*]], label [[A2:%.*]], label [[DUMMY:%.*]] | |
| ; CHECK: A2: | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: [[COND_FR:%.*]] = freeze i1 [[COND1]] | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[COND_FR]], label [[REACHABLE:%.*]], label [[UNREACHABLE:%.*]] | |
| ; CHECK: B: | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[DUMMYCOND]], label [[B2:%.*]], label [[DUMMY]] | |
| ; CHECK: B2: | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: [[COND_FR2:%.*]] = freeze i1 [[COND1]] | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[COND_FR2]], label [[UNREACHABLE]], label [[REACHABLE]] | |
| ; CHECK: REACHABLE: | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: call void @f() | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: ret void | |
| ; CHECK: UNREACHABLE: | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: ret void | |
| ; CHECK: DUMMY: | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: ret void | |
| ; | |
| %cond1 = icmp slt i32 0, %x | |
| %cond = and i1 %cond1, %cond2 | |
| %cond.fr0 = freeze i1 %cond | |
| br i1 %cond.fr0, label %A, label %B | |
| A: | |
| br i1 %dummycond, label %A2, label %DUMMY | |
| A2: | |
| %cond.fr = freeze i1 %cond1 | |
| br i1 %cond.fr, label %REACHABLE, label %UNREACHABLE | |
| B: | |
| br i1 %dummycond, label %B2, label %DUMMY | |
| B2: | |
| %cond.fr2 = freeze i1 %cond1 | |
| br i1 %cond.fr2, label %UNREACHABLE, label %REACHABLE | |
| REACHABLE: | |
| call void @f() | |
| ret void | |
| UNREACHABLE: | |
| ret void | |
| DUMMY: | |
| ret void | |
| } | |
| define void @and(i32 %x, i1 %cond2, i1 %dummycond) { | |
| ; CHECK-LABEL: @and( | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: [[COND1:%.*]] = icmp slt i32 0, [[X:%.*]] | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: [[COND:%.*]] = and i1 [[COND1]], [[COND2:%.*]] | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[COND]], label [[A:%.*]], label [[B:%.*]] | |
| ; CHECK: A: | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[DUMMYCOND:%.*]], label [[REACHABLE:%.*]], label [[DUMMY:%.*]] | |
| ; CHECK: B: | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[DUMMYCOND]], label [[B2:%.*]], label [[DUMMY]] | |
| ; CHECK: B2: | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: [[COND_FR2:%.*]] = freeze i1 [[COND1]] | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[COND_FR2]], label [[REACHABLE]], label [[REACHABLE2:%.*]] | |
| ; CHECK: REACHABLE: | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: call void @f() | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: ret void | |
| ; CHECK: REACHABLE2: | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: call void @f() | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: ret void | |
| ; CHECK: DUMMY: | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: ret void | |
| ; | |
| %cond1 = icmp slt i32 0, %x | |
| %cond = and i1 %cond1, %cond2 | |
| br i1 %cond, label %A, label %B | |
| A: | |
| br i1 %dummycond, label %A2, label %DUMMY | |
| A2: | |
| %cond.fr = freeze i1 %cond1 | |
| br i1 %cond.fr, label %REACHABLE, label %UNREACHABLE | |
| B: | |
| br i1 %dummycond, label %B2, label %DUMMY | |
| B2: | |
| %cond.fr2 = freeze i1 %cond1 | |
| br i1 %cond.fr2, label %REACHABLE, label %REACHABLE2 | |
| REACHABLE: | |
| call void @f() | |
| ret void | |
| REACHABLE2: | |
| call void @f() | |
| ret void | |
| UNREACHABLE: | |
| ret void | |
| DUMMY: | |
| ret void | |
| } |