| //===- IndVarSimplify.cpp - Induction Variable Elimination ----------------===// | |
| // | |
| // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. | |
| // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. | |
| // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception | |
| // | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // | |
| // This transformation analyzes and transforms the induction variables (and | |
| // computations derived from them) into simpler forms suitable for subsequent | |
| // analysis and transformation. | |
| // | |
| // If the trip count of a loop is computable, this pass also makes the following | |
| // changes: | |
| // 1. The exit condition for the loop is canonicalized to compare the | |
| // induction value against the exit value. This turns loops like: | |
| // 'for (i = 7; i*i < 1000; ++i)' into 'for (i = 0; i != 25; ++i)' | |
| // 2. Any use outside of the loop of an expression derived from the indvar | |
| // is changed to compute the derived value outside of the loop, eliminating | |
| // the dependence on the exit value of the induction variable. If the only | |
| // purpose of the loop is to compute the exit value of some derived | |
| // expression, this transformation will make the loop dead. | |
| // | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.h" | |
| #include "ScalarOptions.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/APFloat.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/iterator_range.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopPass.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/MemorySSA.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpressions.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionPatternMatch.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Constant.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/ConstantRange.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Constants.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/DataLayout.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/DerivedTypes.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Function.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/InstrTypes.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Instruction.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Intrinsics.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/PassManager.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/PatternMatch.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Type.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Use.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/User.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Value.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/ValueHandle.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Support/Casting.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Support/Debug.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Support/MathExtras.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/SimpleLoopUnswitch.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyIndVar.h" | |
| #include <cassert> | |
| #include <cstdint> | |
| #include <utility> | |
| using namespace llvm; | |
| using namespace PatternMatch; | |
| using namespace SCEVPatternMatch; | |
| #define DEBUG_TYPE "indvars" | |
| STATISTIC(NumWidened , "Number of indvars widened"); | |
| STATISTIC(NumReplaced , "Number of exit values replaced"); | |
| STATISTIC(NumLFTR , "Number of loop exit tests replaced"); | |
| STATISTIC(NumElimExt , "Number of IV sign/zero extends eliminated"); | |
| STATISTIC(NumElimIV , "Number of congruent IVs eliminated"); | |
| namespace { | |
| class IndVarSimplify { | |
| const ScalarOptions &Opts; | |
| LoopInfo *LI; | |
| ScalarEvolution *SE; | |
| DominatorTree *DT; | |
| const DataLayout &DL; | |
| TargetLibraryInfo *TLI; | |
| const TargetTransformInfo *TTI; | |
| std::unique_ptr<MemorySSAUpdater> MSSAU; | |
| SmallVector<WeakTrackingVH, 16> DeadInsts; | |
| bool WidenIndVars; | |
| bool RunUnswitching = false; | |
| bool handleFloatingPointIV(Loop *L, PHINode *PH); | |
| bool rewriteNonIntegerIVs(Loop *L); | |
| bool simplifyAndExtend(Loop *L, SCEVExpander &Rewriter, LoopInfo *LI); | |
| /// Try to improve our exit conditions by converting condition from signed | |
| /// to unsigned or rotating computation out of the loop. | |
| /// (See inline comment about why this is duplicated from simplifyAndExtend) | |
| bool canonicalizeExitCondition(Loop *L); | |
| /// Try to eliminate loop exits based on analyzeable exit counts | |
| bool optimizeLoopExits(Loop *L, SCEVExpander &Rewriter); | |
| /// Try to form loop invariant tests for loop exits by changing how many | |
| /// iterations of the loop run when that is unobservable. | |
| bool predicateLoopExits(Loop *L, SCEVExpander &Rewriter); | |
| bool rewriteFirstIterationLoopExitValues(Loop *L); | |
| bool linearFunctionTestReplace(Loop *L, BasicBlock *ExitingBB, | |
| const SCEV *ExitCount, | |
| PHINode *IndVar, SCEVExpander &Rewriter); | |
| bool sinkUnusedInvariants(Loop *L); | |
| public: | |
| IndVarSimplify(const ScalarOptions &Opts, LoopInfo *LI, ScalarEvolution *SE, | |
| DominatorTree *DT, const DataLayout &DL, | |
| TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, TargetTransformInfo *TTI, | |
| MemorySSA *MSSA, bool WidenIndVars) | |
| : Opts(Opts), LI(LI), SE(SE), DT(DT), DL(DL), TLI(TLI), TTI(TTI), | |
| WidenIndVars(WidenIndVars) { | |
| if (MSSA) | |
| MSSAU = std::make_unique<MemorySSAUpdater>(MSSA); | |
| } | |
| bool run(Loop *L); | |
| bool runUnswitching() const { return RunUnswitching; } | |
| }; | |
| } // end anonymous namespace | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // rewriteNonIntegerIVs and helpers. Prefer integer IVs. | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| /// Convert APF to an integer, if possible. | |
| static bool ConvertToSInt(const APFloat &APF, int64_t &IntVal) { | |
| bool isExact = false; | |
| // See if we can convert this to an int64_t | |
| uint64_t UIntVal; | |
| if (APF.convertToInteger(MutableArrayRef(UIntVal), 64, true, | |
| APFloat::rmTowardZero, &isExact) != APFloat::opOK || | |
| !isExact) | |
| return false; | |
| IntVal = UIntVal; | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| /// Ensure we stay within the bounds of fp values that can be represented as | |
| /// integers without gaps, which are 2^24 and 2^53 for IEEE-754 single and | |
| /// double precision respectively (both on negative and positive side). | |
| static bool isRepresentableAsExactInteger(const APFloat &FPVal, | |
| int64_t IntVal) { | |
| const auto &FltSema = FPVal.getSemantics(); | |
| if (!APFloat::isIEEELikeFP(FltSema)) | |
| return false; | |
| return isUIntN(APFloat::semanticsPrecision(FltSema), AbsoluteValue(IntVal)); | |
| } | |
| /// Represents a floating-point induction variable pattern that may be | |
| /// convertible to integer form. | |
| struct FloatingPointIV { | |
| APFloat InitValue; | |
| APFloat IncrValue; | |
| APFloat ExitValue; | |
| FCmpInst *Compare; | |
| BinaryOperator *Add; | |
| bool ExitsOnTrue; | |
| FloatingPointIV(APFloat Init, APFloat Incr, APFloat Exit, FCmpInst *Compare, | |
| BinaryOperator *Add, bool ExitsOnTrue) | |
| : InitValue(std::move(Init)), IncrValue(std::move(Incr)), | |
| ExitValue(std::move(Exit)), Compare(Compare), Add(Add), | |
| ExitsOnTrue(ExitsOnTrue) {} | |
| }; | |
| /// Represents the integer values for a converted IV. | |
| struct IntegerIV { | |
| int64_t InitValue; | |
| int64_t IncrValue; | |
| int64_t ExitValue; | |
| CmpInst::Predicate NewPred; | |
| }; | |
| static CmpInst::Predicate getIntegerPredicate(CmpInst::Predicate FPPred) { | |
| switch (FPPred) { | |
| case CmpInst::FCMP_OEQ: | |
| case CmpInst::FCMP_UEQ: | |
| return CmpInst::ICMP_EQ; | |
| case CmpInst::FCMP_ONE: | |
| case CmpInst::FCMP_UNE: | |
| return CmpInst::ICMP_NE; | |
| case CmpInst::FCMP_OGT: | |
| case CmpInst::FCMP_UGT: | |
| return CmpInst::ICMP_SGT; | |
| case CmpInst::FCMP_OGE: | |
| case CmpInst::FCMP_UGE: | |
| return CmpInst::ICMP_SGE; | |
| case CmpInst::FCMP_OLT: | |
| case CmpInst::FCMP_ULT: | |
| return CmpInst::ICMP_SLT; | |
| case CmpInst::FCMP_OLE: | |
| case CmpInst::FCMP_ULE: | |
| return CmpInst::ICMP_SLE; | |
| default: | |
| return CmpInst::BAD_ICMP_PREDICATE; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| /// Analyze a PN to determine whether it represents a simple floating-point | |
| /// induction variable, with constant fp init, increment, and exit values. | |
| /// | |
| /// Returns a FloatingPointIV struct if matched, std::nullopt otherwise. | |
| static std::optional<FloatingPointIV> | |
| maybeFloatingPointRecurrence(Loop *L, PHINode *PN) { | |
| // Identify incoming and backedge for the PN. | |
| unsigned IncomingEdge = L->contains(PN->getIncomingBlock(0)); | |
| unsigned BackEdge = IncomingEdge ^ 1; | |
| // Check incoming value. | |
| auto *InitValueVal = dyn_cast<ConstantFP>(PN->getIncomingValue(IncomingEdge)); | |
| if (!InitValueVal) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| // Check IV increment. Reject this PN if increment operation is not | |
| // an add or increment value can not be represented by an integer. | |
| auto *Incr = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(PN->getIncomingValue(BackEdge)); | |
| if (!Incr || Incr->getOpcode() != Instruction::FAdd) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| // If this is not an add of the PHI with a constantfp, or if the constant fp | |
| // is not an integer, bail out. | |
| auto *IncValueVal = dyn_cast<ConstantFP>(Incr->getOperand(1)); | |
| if (!IncValueVal || Incr->getOperand(0) != PN) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| // Check Incr uses. One user is PN and the other user is an exit condition | |
| // used by the conditional terminator. | |
| // TODO: Should relax this, so as to allow any `fpext` that may occur. | |
| if (!Incr->hasNUses(2)) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| // Find exit condition, which is an fcmp. If it doesn't exist, or if it isn't | |
| // only used by a branch, we can't transform it. | |
| auto It = llvm::find_if(Incr->users(), | |
| [](const User *U) { return isa<FCmpInst>(U); }); | |
| if (It == Incr->users().end()) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| FCmpInst *Compare = cast<FCmpInst>(*It); | |
| if (!Compare->hasOneUse()) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| // We need to verify that the branch actually controls the iteration count | |
| // of the loop. If not, the new IV can overflow and no one will notice. | |
| // The branch block must be in the loop and one of the successors must be out | |
| // of the loop. | |
| auto *BI = dyn_cast<CondBrInst>(Compare->user_back()); | |
| if (!BI) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| if (!L->contains(BI->getParent()) || | |
| (L->contains(BI->getSuccessor(0)) && L->contains(BI->getSuccessor(1)))) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| bool ExitsOnTrue = !L->contains(BI->getSuccessor(0)); | |
| // If it isn't a comparison with an integer-as-fp (the exit value), we can't | |
| // transform it. | |
| auto *ExitValueVal = dyn_cast<ConstantFP>(Compare->getOperand(1)); | |
| if (!ExitValueVal) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| return FloatingPointIV( | |
| InitValueVal->getValueAPF(), IncValueVal->getValueAPF(), | |
| ExitValueVal->getValueAPF(), Compare, Incr, ExitsOnTrue); | |
| } | |
| /// Ensure that the floating-point IV can be converted to a semantics-preserving | |
| /// signed 32-bit integer IV. | |
| /// | |
| /// Returns a IntegerIV struct if possible, std::nullopt otherwise. | |
| static std::optional<IntegerIV> | |
| tryConvertToIntegerIV(const FloatingPointIV &FPIV) { | |
| // Convert floating-point predicate to integer. | |
| auto NewPred = getIntegerPredicate(FPIV.Compare->getPredicate()); | |
| if (NewPred == CmpInst::BAD_ICMP_PREDICATE) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| // Convert APFloat values to signed integers. | |
| int64_t InitValue, IncrValue, ExitValue; | |
| if (!ConvertToSInt(FPIV.InitValue, InitValue) || | |
| !ConvertToSInt(FPIV.IncrValue, IncrValue) || | |
| !ConvertToSInt(FPIV.ExitValue, ExitValue)) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| // Bail out if integers cannot be represented exactly. | |
| if (!isRepresentableAsExactInteger(FPIV.InitValue, InitValue) || | |
| !isRepresentableAsExactInteger(FPIV.ExitValue, ExitValue)) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| // We convert the floating point induction variable to a signed i32 value if | |
| // we can. This is only safe if the comparison will not overflow in a way that | |
| // won't be trapped by the integer equivalent operations. Check for this now. | |
| // TODO: We could use i64 if it is native and the range requires it. | |
| // The start/stride/exit values must all fit in signed i32. | |
| if (!isInt<32>(InitValue) || !isInt<32>(IncrValue) || !isInt<32>(ExitValue)) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| // If not actually striding (add x, 0.0), avoid touching the code. | |
| if (IncrValue == 0) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| // Compute the predicate under which the loop keeps iterating. | |
| CmpInst::Predicate ContinuePred = | |
| FPIV.ExitsOnTrue ? CmpInst::getInversePredicate(NewPred) : NewPred; | |
| // Normalize to positive stride. | |
| int64_t Start = InitValue, Step = IncrValue, Bound = ExitValue; | |
| if (Step < 0) { | |
| Start = -Start; | |
| Step = -Step; | |
| Bound = -Bound; | |
| ContinuePred = CmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(ContinuePred); | |
| } | |
| // Start of IV is below the exit value. | |
| if (Start >= Bound) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| // Compute the last value of the incremented IV. | |
| uint64_t Dist = Bound - Start; | |
| int64_t Last; | |
| switch (ContinuePred) { | |
| case CmpInst::ICMP_SLT: | |
| Last = Start + alignTo(Dist, Step); | |
| break; | |
| case CmpInst::ICMP_SLE: | |
| Last = Start + alignTo(Dist + 1, Step); | |
| break; | |
| case CmpInst::ICMP_NE: | |
| // The strided value must exactly land on the exit value. | |
| if (Dist % Step != 0) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| Last = Bound; | |
| break; | |
| case CmpInst::ICMP_EQ: | |
| Last = Start + Step == Bound ? Bound + Step : Start + Step; | |
| break; | |
| default: | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| } | |
| // The integer IV must not overflow before the loop exits. | |
| if (!isInt<32>(Last)) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| return IntegerIV{InitValue, IncrValue, ExitValue, NewPred}; | |
| } | |
| /// Rewrite the floating-point IV as an integer IV. | |
| static void canonicalizeToIntegerIV(Loop *L, PHINode *PN, | |
| const FloatingPointIV &FPIV, | |
| const IntegerIV &IIV, | |
| const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, | |
| std::unique_ptr<MemorySSAUpdater> &MSSAU) { | |
| unsigned IncomingEdge = L->contains(PN->getIncomingBlock(0)); | |
| unsigned BackEdge = IncomingEdge ^ 1; | |
| IntegerType *Int32Ty = Type::getInt32Ty(PN->getContext()); | |
| auto *Incr = cast<BinaryOperator>(PN->getIncomingValue(BackEdge)); | |
| auto *BI = cast<CondBrInst>(FPIV.Compare->user_back()); | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "INDVARS: Rewriting floating-point IV to integer IV:\n" | |
| << " Init: " << IIV.InitValue << "\n" | |
| << " Incr: " << IIV.IncrValue << "\n" | |
| << " Exit: " << IIV.ExitValue << "\n" | |
| << " Pred: " << CmpInst::getPredicateName(IIV.NewPred) | |
| << "\n" | |
| << " Original PN: " << *PN << "\n"); | |
| // Insert new integer induction variable. | |
| PHINode *NewPHI = | |
| PHINode::Create(Int32Ty, 2, PN->getName() + ".int", PN->getIterator()); | |
| NewPHI->addIncoming(ConstantInt::getSigned(Int32Ty, IIV.InitValue), | |
| PN->getIncomingBlock(IncomingEdge)); | |
| NewPHI->setDebugLoc(PN->getDebugLoc()); | |
| Instruction *NewAdd = BinaryOperator::CreateAdd( | |
| NewPHI, ConstantInt::getSigned(Int32Ty, IIV.IncrValue), | |
| Incr->getName() + ".int", Incr->getIterator()); | |
| NewAdd->setDebugLoc(Incr->getDebugLoc()); | |
| NewPHI->addIncoming(NewAdd, PN->getIncomingBlock(BackEdge)); | |
| ICmpInst *NewCompare = new ICmpInst( | |
| BI->getIterator(), IIV.NewPred, NewAdd, | |
| ConstantInt::getSigned(Int32Ty, IIV.ExitValue), FPIV.Compare->getName()); | |
| NewCompare->setDebugLoc(FPIV.Compare->getDebugLoc()); | |
| // In the following deletions, PN may become dead and may be deleted. | |
| // Use a WeakTrackingVH to observe whether this happens. | |
| WeakTrackingVH WeakPH = PN; | |
| // Delete the old floating point exit comparison. The branch starts using the | |
| // new comparison. | |
| NewCompare->takeName(FPIV.Compare); | |
| FPIV.Compare->replaceAllUsesWith(NewCompare); | |
| RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(FPIV.Compare, TLI, MSSAU.get()); | |
| // Delete the old floating point increment. | |
| Incr->replaceAllUsesWith(PoisonValue::get(Incr->getType())); | |
| RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(Incr, TLI, MSSAU.get()); | |
| // If the FP induction variable still has uses, this is because something else | |
| // in the loop uses its value. In order to canonicalize the induction | |
| // variable, we chose to eliminate the IV and rewrite it in terms of an | |
| // int->fp cast. | |
| // | |
| // We give preference to sitofp over uitofp because it is faster on most | |
| // platforms. | |
| if (WeakPH) { | |
| Instruction *Conv = new SIToFPInst(NewPHI, PN->getType(), "indvar.conv", | |
| PN->getParent()->getFirstInsertionPt()); | |
| Conv->setDebugLoc(PN->getDebugLoc()); | |
| PN->replaceAllUsesWith(Conv); | |
| RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(PN, TLI, MSSAU.get()); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| /// If the loop has a floating induction variable, then insert corresponding | |
| /// integer induction variable if possible. For example, the following: | |
| /// for(double i = 0; i < 10000; ++i) | |
| /// bar(i) | |
| /// is converted into | |
| /// for(int i = 0; i < 10000; ++i) | |
| /// bar((double)i); | |
| bool IndVarSimplify::handleFloatingPointIV(Loop *L, PHINode *PN) { | |
| // See if the PN matches a floating-point IV pattern. | |
| auto FPIV = maybeFloatingPointRecurrence(L, PN); | |
| if (!FPIV) | |
| return false; | |
| // Can we safely convert the floating-point values to integer ones? | |
| auto IIV = tryConvertToIntegerIV(*FPIV); | |
| if (!IIV) | |
| return false; | |
| // Perform the rewriting. | |
| canonicalizeToIntegerIV(L, PN, *FPIV, *IIV, TLI, MSSAU); | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| bool IndVarSimplify::rewriteNonIntegerIVs(Loop *L) { | |
| // First step. Check to see if there are any floating-point recurrences. | |
| // If there are, change them into integer recurrences, permitting analysis by | |
| // the SCEV routines. | |
| BasicBlock *Header = L->getHeader(); | |
| SmallVector<WeakTrackingVH, 8> PHIs(llvm::make_pointer_range(Header->phis())); | |
| bool Changed = false; | |
| for (WeakTrackingVH &PHI : PHIs) | |
| if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast_or_null<PHINode>(&*PHI)) | |
| Changed |= handleFloatingPointIV(L, PN); | |
| // If the loop previously had floating-point IV, ScalarEvolution | |
| // may not have been able to compute a trip count. Now that we've done some | |
| // re-writing, the trip count may be computable. | |
| if (Changed) | |
| SE->forgetLoop(L); | |
| return Changed; | |
| } | |
| //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // rewriteFirstIterationLoopExitValues: Rewrite loop exit values if we know | |
| // they will exit at the first iteration. | |
| //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| /// Check to see if this loop has loop invariant conditions which lead to loop | |
| /// exits. If so, we know that if the exit path is taken, it is at the first | |
| /// loop iteration. This lets us predict exit values of PHI nodes that live in | |
| /// loop header. | |
| bool IndVarSimplify::rewriteFirstIterationLoopExitValues(Loop *L) { | |
| // Verify the input to the pass is already in LCSSA form. | |
| assert(L->isLCSSAForm(*DT)); | |
| SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 8> ExitBlocks; | |
| L->getUniqueExitBlocks(ExitBlocks); | |
| bool MadeAnyChanges = false; | |
| for (auto *ExitBB : ExitBlocks) { | |
| // If there are no more PHI nodes in this exit block, then no more | |
| // values defined inside the loop are used on this path. | |
| for (PHINode &PN : ExitBB->phis()) { | |
| for (unsigned IncomingValIdx = 0, E = PN.getNumIncomingValues(); | |
| IncomingValIdx != E; ++IncomingValIdx) { | |
| auto *IncomingBB = PN.getIncomingBlock(IncomingValIdx); | |
| // Can we prove that the exit must run on the first iteration if it | |
| // runs at all? (i.e. early exits are fine for our purposes, but | |
| // traces which lead to this exit being taken on the 2nd iteration | |
| // aren't.) Note that this is about whether the exit branch is | |
| // executed, not about whether it is taken. | |
| if (!L->getLoopLatch() || | |
| !DT->dominates(IncomingBB, L->getLoopLatch())) | |
| continue; | |
| // Get condition that leads to the exit path. | |
| auto *TermInst = IncomingBB->getTerminator(); | |
| Value *Cond = nullptr; | |
| if (auto *BI = dyn_cast<CondBrInst>(TermInst)) { | |
| // Must be a conditional branch, otherwise the block | |
| // should not be in the loop. | |
| Cond = BI->getCondition(); | |
| } else if (auto *SI = dyn_cast<SwitchInst>(TermInst)) | |
| Cond = SI->getCondition(); | |
| else | |
| continue; | |
| if (!L->isLoopInvariant(Cond)) | |
| continue; | |
| auto *ExitVal = dyn_cast<PHINode>(PN.getIncomingValue(IncomingValIdx)); | |
| // Only deal with PHIs in the loop header. | |
| if (!ExitVal || ExitVal->getParent() != L->getHeader()) | |
| continue; | |
| // If ExitVal is a PHI on the loop header, then we know its | |
| // value along this exit because the exit can only be taken | |
| // on the first iteration. | |
| auto *LoopPreheader = L->getLoopPreheader(); | |
| assert(LoopPreheader && "Invalid loop"); | |
| int PreheaderIdx = ExitVal->getBasicBlockIndex(LoopPreheader); | |
| if (PreheaderIdx != -1) { | |
| assert(ExitVal->getParent() == L->getHeader() && | |
| "ExitVal must be in loop header"); | |
| MadeAnyChanges = true; | |
| PN.setIncomingValue(IncomingValIdx, | |
| ExitVal->getIncomingValue(PreheaderIdx)); | |
| SE->forgetValue(&PN); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return MadeAnyChanges; | |
| } | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // IV Widening - Extend the width of an IV to cover its widest uses. | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| /// Update information about the induction variable that is extended by this | |
| /// sign or zero extend operation. This is used to determine the final width of | |
| /// the IV before actually widening it. | |
| static void visitIVCast(CastInst *Cast, WideIVInfo &WI, | |
| ScalarEvolution *SE, | |
| const TargetTransformInfo *TTI) { | |
| bool IsSigned = Cast->getOpcode() == Instruction::SExt; | |
| if (!IsSigned && Cast->getOpcode() != Instruction::ZExt) | |
| return; | |
| Type *Ty = Cast->getType(); | |
| uint64_t Width = SE->getTypeSizeInBits(Ty); | |
| if (!Cast->getDataLayout().isLegalInteger(Width)) | |
| return; | |
| // Check that `Cast` actually extends the induction variable (we rely on this | |
| // later). This takes care of cases where `Cast` is extending a truncation of | |
| // the narrow induction variable, and thus can end up being narrower than the | |
| // "narrow" induction variable. | |
| uint64_t NarrowIVWidth = SE->getTypeSizeInBits(WI.NarrowIV->getType()); | |
| if (NarrowIVWidth >= Width) | |
| return; | |
| // Cast is either an sext or zext up to this point. | |
| // We should not widen an indvar if arithmetics on the wider indvar are more | |
| // expensive than those on the narrower indvar. We check only the cost of ADD | |
| // because at least an ADD is required to increment the induction variable. We | |
| // could compute more comprehensively the cost of all instructions on the | |
| // induction variable when necessary. | |
| TTI::TargetCostKind CostKind = TTI::TCK_RecipThroughput; | |
| if (TTI && TTI->getArithmeticInstrCost(Instruction::Add, Ty, CostKind) > | |
| TTI->getArithmeticInstrCost(Instruction::Add, | |
| Cast->getOperand(0)->getType(), | |
| CostKind)) { | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| if (!WI.WidestNativeType || | |
| Width > SE->getTypeSizeInBits(WI.WidestNativeType)) { | |
| WI.WidestNativeType = SE->getEffectiveSCEVType(Ty); | |
| WI.IsSigned = IsSigned; | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| // We extend the IV to satisfy the sign of its user(s), or 'signed' | |
| // if there are multiple users with both sign- and zero extensions, | |
| // in order not to introduce nondeterministic behaviour based on the | |
| // unspecified order of a PHI nodes' users-iterator. | |
| WI.IsSigned |= IsSigned; | |
| } | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // Live IV Reduction - Minimize IVs live across the loop. | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // Simplification of IV users based on SCEV evaluation. | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| namespace { | |
| class IndVarSimplifyVisitor : public IVVisitor { | |
| ScalarEvolution *SE; | |
| const TargetTransformInfo *TTI; | |
| PHINode *IVPhi; | |
| public: | |
| WideIVInfo WI; | |
| IndVarSimplifyVisitor(PHINode *IV, ScalarEvolution *SCEV, | |
| const TargetTransformInfo *TTI, | |
| const DominatorTree *DTree) | |
| : SE(SCEV), TTI(TTI), IVPhi(IV) { | |
| DT = DTree; | |
| WI.NarrowIV = IVPhi; | |
| } | |
| // Implement the interface used by simplifyUsersOfIV. | |
| void visitCast(CastInst *Cast) override { visitIVCast(Cast, WI, SE, TTI); } | |
| }; | |
| } // end anonymous namespace | |
| /// Iteratively perform simplification on a worklist of IV users. Each | |
| /// successive simplification may push more users which may themselves be | |
| /// candidates for simplification. | |
| /// | |
| /// Sign/Zero extend elimination is interleaved with IV simplification. | |
| bool IndVarSimplify::simplifyAndExtend(Loop *L, | |
| SCEVExpander &Rewriter, | |
| LoopInfo *LI) { | |
| SmallVector<WideIVInfo, 8> WideIVs; | |
| auto *GuardDecl = Intrinsic::getDeclarationIfExists( | |
| L->getBlocks()[0]->getModule(), Intrinsic::experimental_guard); | |
| bool HasGuards = GuardDecl && !GuardDecl->use_empty(); | |
| SmallVector<PHINode *, 8> LoopPhis( | |
| llvm::make_pointer_range(L->getHeader()->phis())); | |
| // Each round of simplification iterates through the SimplifyIVUsers worklist | |
| // for all current phis, then determines whether any IVs can be | |
| // widened. Widening adds new phis to LoopPhis, inducing another round of | |
| // simplification on the wide IVs. | |
| bool Changed = false; | |
| while (!LoopPhis.empty()) { | |
| // Evaluate as many IV expressions as possible before widening any IVs. This | |
| // forces SCEV to set no-wrap flags before evaluating sign/zero | |
| // extension. The first time SCEV attempts to normalize sign/zero extension, | |
| // the result becomes final. So for the most predictable results, we delay | |
| // evaluation of sign/zero extend evaluation until needed, and avoid running | |
| // other SCEV based analysis prior to simplifyAndExtend. | |
| do { | |
| PHINode *CurrIV = LoopPhis.pop_back_val(); | |
| // Information about sign/zero extensions of CurrIV. | |
| IndVarSimplifyVisitor Visitor(CurrIV, SE, TTI, DT); | |
| const auto &[C, U] = simplifyUsersOfIV(CurrIV, SE, DT, LI, TTI, DeadInsts, | |
| Rewriter, &Visitor); | |
| Changed |= C; | |
| RunUnswitching |= U; | |
| if (Visitor.WI.WidestNativeType) { | |
| WideIVs.push_back(Visitor.WI); | |
| } | |
| } while(!LoopPhis.empty()); | |
| // Continue if we disallowed widening. | |
| if (!WidenIndVars) | |
| continue; | |
| for (; !WideIVs.empty(); WideIVs.pop_back()) { | |
| unsigned ElimExt; | |
| unsigned Widened; | |
| if (PHINode *WidePhi = createWideIV( | |
| WideIVs.back(), LI, SE, Rewriter, DT, DeadInsts, ElimExt, Widened, | |
| HasGuards, Opts.indvars_post_increment_ranges)) { | |
| NumElimExt += ElimExt; | |
| NumWidened += Widened; | |
| Changed = true; | |
| LoopPhis.push_back(WidePhi); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return Changed; | |
| } | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // linearFunctionTestReplace and its kin. Rewrite the loop exit condition. | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| /// Given an Value which is hoped to be part of an add recurance in the given | |
| /// loop, return the associated Phi node if so. Otherwise, return null. Note | |
| /// that this is less general than SCEVs AddRec checking. | |
| static PHINode *getLoopPhiForCounter(Value *IncV, Loop *L) { | |
| Instruction *IncI = dyn_cast<Instruction>(IncV); | |
| if (!IncI) | |
| return nullptr; | |
| switch (IncI->getOpcode()) { | |
| case Instruction::Add: | |
| case Instruction::Sub: | |
| break; | |
| case Instruction::GetElementPtr: | |
| // An IV counter must preserve its type. | |
| if (IncI->getNumOperands() == 2) | |
| break; | |
| [[fallthrough]]; | |
| default: | |
| return nullptr; | |
| } | |
| PHINode *Phi = dyn_cast<PHINode>(IncI->getOperand(0)); | |
| if (Phi && Phi->getParent() == L->getHeader()) { | |
| if (L->isLoopInvariant(IncI->getOperand(1))) | |
| return Phi; | |
| return nullptr; | |
| } | |
| if (IncI->getOpcode() == Instruction::GetElementPtr) | |
| return nullptr; | |
| // Allow add/sub to be commuted. | |
| Phi = dyn_cast<PHINode>(IncI->getOperand(1)); | |
| if (Phi && Phi->getParent() == L->getHeader()) { | |
| if (L->isLoopInvariant(IncI->getOperand(0))) | |
| return Phi; | |
| } | |
| return nullptr; | |
| } | |
| /// Whether the current loop exit test is based on this value. Currently this | |
| /// is limited to a direct use in the loop condition. | |
| static bool isLoopExitTestBasedOn(Value *V, BasicBlock *ExitingBB) { | |
| CondBrInst *BI = cast<CondBrInst>(ExitingBB->getTerminator()); | |
| ICmpInst *ICmp = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(BI->getCondition()); | |
| // TODO: Allow non-icmp loop test. | |
| if (!ICmp) | |
| return false; | |
| // TODO: Allow indirect use. | |
| return ICmp->getOperand(0) == V || ICmp->getOperand(1) == V; | |
| } | |
| /// linearFunctionTestReplace policy. Return true unless we can show that the | |
| /// current exit test is already sufficiently canonical. | |
| static bool needsLFTR(Loop *L, BasicBlock *ExitingBB) { | |
| assert(L->getLoopLatch() && "Must be in simplified form"); | |
| // Avoid converting a constant or loop invariant test back to a runtime | |
| // test. This is critical for when SCEV's cached ExitCount is less precise | |
| // than the current IR (such as after we've proven a particular exit is | |
| // actually dead and thus the BE count never reaches our ExitCount.) | |
| CondBrInst *BI = cast<CondBrInst>(ExitingBB->getTerminator()); | |
| if (L->isLoopInvariant(BI->getCondition())) | |
| return false; | |
| // Do LFTR to simplify the exit condition to an ICMP. | |
| ICmpInst *Cond = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(BI->getCondition()); | |
| if (!Cond) | |
| return true; | |
| // Do LFTR to simplify the exit ICMP to EQ/NE | |
| ICmpInst::Predicate Pred = Cond->getPredicate(); | |
| if (Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_NE && Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ) | |
| return true; | |
| // Look for a loop invariant RHS | |
| Value *LHS = Cond->getOperand(0); | |
| Value *RHS = Cond->getOperand(1); | |
| if (!L->isLoopInvariant(RHS)) { | |
| if (!L->isLoopInvariant(LHS)) | |
| return true; | |
| std::swap(LHS, RHS); | |
| } | |
| // Look for a simple IV counter LHS | |
| PHINode *Phi = dyn_cast<PHINode>(LHS); | |
| if (!Phi) | |
| Phi = getLoopPhiForCounter(LHS, L); | |
| if (!Phi) | |
| return true; | |
| // Do LFTR if PHI node is defined in the loop, but is *not* a counter. | |
| int Idx = Phi->getBasicBlockIndex(L->getLoopLatch()); | |
| if (Idx < 0) | |
| return true; | |
| // Do LFTR if the exit condition's IV is *not* a simple counter. | |
| Value *IncV = Phi->getIncomingValue(Idx); | |
| return Phi != getLoopPhiForCounter(IncV, L); | |
| } | |
| /// Recursive helper for hasConcreteDef(). Unfortunately, this currently boils | |
| /// down to checking that all operands are constant and listing instructions | |
| /// that may hide undef. | |
| static bool hasConcreteDefImpl(Value *V, SmallPtrSetImpl<Value*> &Visited, | |
| unsigned Depth) { | |
| if (isa<Constant>(V)) | |
| return !isa<UndefValue>(V); | |
| if (Depth >= 6) | |
| return false; | |
| // Conservatively handle non-constant non-instructions. For example, Arguments | |
| // may be undef. | |
| Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V); | |
| if (!I) | |
| return false; | |
| // Load and return values may be undef. | |
| if(I->mayReadFromMemory() || isa<CallInst>(I) || isa<InvokeInst>(I)) | |
| return false; | |
| // Optimistically handle other instructions. | |
| for (Value *Op : I->operands()) { | |
| if (!Visited.insert(Op).second) | |
| continue; | |
| if (!hasConcreteDefImpl(Op, Visited, Depth+1)) | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| /// Return true if the given value is concrete. We must prove that undef can | |
| /// never reach it. | |
| /// | |
| /// TODO: If we decide that this is a good approach to checking for undef, we | |
| /// may factor it into a common location. | |
| static bool hasConcreteDef(Value *V) { | |
| SmallPtrSet<Value*, 8> Visited; | |
| Visited.insert(V); | |
| return hasConcreteDefImpl(V, Visited, 0); | |
| } | |
| /// Return true if the given phi is a "counter" in L. A counter is an | |
| /// add recurance (of integer or pointer type) with an arbitrary start, and a | |
| /// step of 1. Note that L must have exactly one latch. | |
| static bool isLoopCounter(PHINode* Phi, Loop *L, | |
| ScalarEvolution *SE) { | |
| assert(Phi->getParent() == L->getHeader()); | |
| assert(L->getLoopLatch()); | |
| if (!SE->isSCEVable(Phi->getType())) | |
| return false; | |
| const SCEV *S = SE->getSCEV(Phi); | |
| if (!match(S, m_scev_AffineAddRec(m_SCEV(), m_scev_One(), m_SpecificLoop(L)))) | |
| return false; | |
| int LatchIdx = Phi->getBasicBlockIndex(L->getLoopLatch()); | |
| Value *IncV = Phi->getIncomingValue(LatchIdx); | |
| return (getLoopPhiForCounter(IncV, L) == Phi && | |
| isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE->getSCEV(IncV))); | |
| } | |
| /// Search the loop header for a loop counter (anadd rec w/step of one) | |
| /// suitable for use by LFTR. If multiple counters are available, select the | |
| /// "best" one based profitable heuristics. | |
| /// | |
| /// BECount may be an i8* pointer type. The pointer difference is already | |
| /// valid count without scaling the address stride, so it remains a pointer | |
| /// expression as far as SCEV is concerned. | |
| static PHINode *FindLoopCounter(Loop *L, BasicBlock *ExitingBB, | |
| const SCEV *BECount, | |
| ScalarEvolution *SE, DominatorTree *DT) { | |
| uint64_t BCWidth = SE->getTypeSizeInBits(BECount->getType()); | |
| Value *Cond = cast<CondBrInst>(ExitingBB->getTerminator())->getCondition(); | |
| // Loop over all of the PHI nodes, looking for a simple counter. | |
| PHINode *BestPhi = nullptr; | |
| const SCEV *BestInit = nullptr; | |
| BasicBlock *LatchBlock = L->getLoopLatch(); | |
| assert(LatchBlock && "Must be in simplified form"); | |
| const DataLayout &DL = L->getHeader()->getDataLayout(); | |
| for (BasicBlock::iterator I = L->getHeader()->begin(); isa<PHINode>(I); ++I) { | |
| PHINode *Phi = cast<PHINode>(I); | |
| if (!isLoopCounter(Phi, L, SE)) | |
| continue; | |
| const auto *AR = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE->getSCEV(Phi)); | |
| // AR may be a pointer type, while BECount is an integer type. | |
| // AR may be wider than BECount. With eq/ne tests overflow is immaterial. | |
| // AR may not be a narrower type, or we may never exit. | |
| uint64_t PhiWidth = SE->getTypeSizeInBits(AR->getType()); | |
| if (PhiWidth < BCWidth || !DL.isLegalInteger(PhiWidth)) | |
| continue; | |
| // Avoid reusing a potentially undef value to compute other values that may | |
| // have originally had a concrete definition. | |
| if (!hasConcreteDef(Phi)) { | |
| // We explicitly allow unknown phis as long as they are already used by | |
| // the loop exit test. This is legal since performing LFTR could not | |
| // increase the number of undef users. | |
| Value *IncPhi = Phi->getIncomingValueForBlock(LatchBlock); | |
| if (!isLoopExitTestBasedOn(Phi, ExitingBB) && | |
| !isLoopExitTestBasedOn(IncPhi, ExitingBB)) | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| // Avoid introducing undefined behavior due to poison which didn't exist in | |
| // the original program. (Annoyingly, the rules for poison and undef | |
| // propagation are distinct, so this does NOT cover the undef case above.) | |
| // We have to ensure that we don't introduce UB by introducing a use on an | |
| // iteration where said IV produces poison. Our strategy here differs for | |
| // pointers and integer IVs. For integers, we strip and reinfer as needed, | |
| // see code in linearFunctionTestReplace. For pointers, we restrict | |
| // transforms as there is no good way to reinfer inbounds once lost. | |
| if (!Phi->getType()->isIntegerTy() && | |
| !mustExecuteUBIfPoisonOnPathTo(Phi, ExitingBB->getTerminator(), DT)) | |
| continue; | |
| const SCEV *Init = AR->getStart(); | |
| if (BestPhi && !isAlmostDeadIV(BestPhi, LatchBlock, Cond)) { | |
| // Don't force a live loop counter if another IV can be used. | |
| if (isAlmostDeadIV(Phi, LatchBlock, Cond)) | |
| continue; | |
| // Prefer to count-from-zero. This is a more "canonical" counter form. It | |
| // also prefers integer to pointer IVs. | |
| if (BestInit->isZero() != Init->isZero()) { | |
| if (BestInit->isZero()) | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| // If two IVs both count from zero or both count from nonzero then the | |
| // narrower is likely a dead phi that has been widened. Use the wider phi | |
| // to allow the other to be eliminated. | |
| else if (PhiWidth <= SE->getTypeSizeInBits(BestPhi->getType())) | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| BestPhi = Phi; | |
| BestInit = Init; | |
| } | |
| return BestPhi; | |
| } | |
| /// Insert an IR expression which computes the value held by the IV IndVar | |
| /// (which must be an loop counter w/unit stride) after the backedge of loop L | |
| /// is taken ExitCount times. | |
| static Value *genLoopLimit(PHINode *IndVar, BasicBlock *ExitingBB, | |
| const SCEV *ExitCount, bool UsePostInc, Loop *L, | |
| SCEVExpander &Rewriter, ScalarEvolution *SE) { | |
| assert(isLoopCounter(IndVar, L, SE)); | |
| assert(ExitCount->getType()->isIntegerTy() && "exit count must be integer"); | |
| const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE->getSCEV(IndVar)); | |
| assert(AR->getStepRecurrence(*SE)->isOne() && "only handles unit stride"); | |
| // For integer IVs, truncate the IV before computing the limit unless we | |
| // know apriori that the limit must be a constant when evaluated in the | |
| // bitwidth of the IV. We prefer (potentially) keeping a truncate of the | |
| // IV in the loop over a (potentially) expensive expansion of the widened | |
| // exit count add(zext(add)) expression. | |
| if (IndVar->getType()->isIntegerTy() && | |
| SE->getTypeSizeInBits(AR->getType()) > | |
| SE->getTypeSizeInBits(ExitCount->getType())) { | |
| const SCEV *IVInit = AR->getStart(); | |
| if (!isa<SCEVConstant>(IVInit) || !isa<SCEVConstant>(ExitCount)) { | |
| const SCEV *TruncExpr = SE->getTruncateExpr(AR, ExitCount->getType()); | |
| // The following bailout is necessary due to the interaction with | |
| // the depth limit in SCEV analysis. | |
| if (!isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(TruncExpr)) | |
| return nullptr; | |
| AR = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(TruncExpr); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| const SCEVAddRecExpr *ARBase = UsePostInc ? AR->getPostIncExpr(*SE) : AR; | |
| const SCEV *IVLimit = ARBase->evaluateAtIteration(ExitCount, *SE); | |
| assert(SE->isLoopInvariant(IVLimit, L) && | |
| "Computed iteration count is not loop invariant!"); | |
| return Rewriter.expandCodeFor(IVLimit, ARBase->getType(), | |
| ExitingBB->getTerminator()); | |
| } | |
| /// This method rewrites the exit condition of the loop to be a canonical != | |
| /// comparison against the incremented loop induction variable. This pass is | |
| /// able to rewrite the exit tests of any loop where the SCEV analysis can | |
| /// determine a loop-invariant trip count of the loop, which is actually a much | |
| /// broader range than just linear tests. | |
| bool IndVarSimplify:: | |
| linearFunctionTestReplace(Loop *L, BasicBlock *ExitingBB, | |
| const SCEV *ExitCount, | |
| PHINode *IndVar, SCEVExpander &Rewriter) { | |
| assert(L->getLoopLatch() && "Loop no longer in simplified form?"); | |
| assert(isLoopCounter(IndVar, L, SE)); | |
| Instruction * const IncVar = | |
| cast<Instruction>(IndVar->getIncomingValueForBlock(L->getLoopLatch())); | |
| // Initialize CmpIndVar to the preincremented IV. | |
| Value *CmpIndVar = IndVar; | |
| bool UsePostInc = false; | |
| // If the exiting block is the same as the backedge block, we prefer to | |
| // compare against the post-incremented value, otherwise we must compare | |
| // against the preincremented value. | |
| if (ExitingBB == L->getLoopLatch()) { | |
| // For pointer IVs, we chose to not strip inbounds which requires us not | |
| // to add a potentially UB introducing use. We need to either a) show | |
| // the loop test we're modifying is already in post-inc form, or b) show | |
| // that adding a use must not introduce UB. | |
| bool SafeToPostInc = | |
| IndVar->getType()->isIntegerTy() || | |
| isLoopExitTestBasedOn(IncVar, ExitingBB) || | |
| mustExecuteUBIfPoisonOnPathTo(IncVar, ExitingBB->getTerminator(), DT); | |
| if (SafeToPostInc) { | |
| UsePostInc = true; | |
| CmpIndVar = IncVar; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| Value *ExitCnt = | |
| genLoopLimit(IndVar, ExitingBB, ExitCount, UsePostInc, L, Rewriter, SE); | |
| if (!ExitCnt) | |
| return false; | |
| assert(ExitCnt->getType()->isPointerTy() == | |
| IndVar->getType()->isPointerTy() && | |
| "genLoopLimit missed a cast"); | |
| // It may be necessary to drop nowrap flags on the incrementing instruction | |
| // if either LFTR moves from a pre-inc check to a post-inc check (in which | |
| // case the increment might have previously been poison on the last iteration | |
| // only) or if LFTR switches to a different IV that was previously dynamically | |
| // dead (and as such may be arbitrarily poison). We remove any nowrap flags | |
| // that SCEV didn't infer for the post-inc addrec (even if we use a pre-inc | |
| // check), because the pre-inc addrec flags may be adopted from the original | |
| // instruction, while SCEV has to explicitly prove the post-inc nowrap flags. | |
| // TODO: This handling is inaccurate for one case: If we switch to a | |
| // dynamically dead IV that wraps on the first loop iteration only, which is | |
| // not covered by the post-inc addrec. (If the new IV was not dynamically | |
| // dead, it could not be poison on the first iteration in the first place.) | |
| if (auto *BO = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(IncVar)) { | |
| const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE->getSCEV(IncVar)); | |
| if (BO->hasNoUnsignedWrap()) | |
| BO->setHasNoUnsignedWrap(AR->hasNoUnsignedWrap()); | |
| if (BO->hasNoSignedWrap()) | |
| BO->setHasNoSignedWrap(AR->hasNoSignedWrap()); | |
| } | |
| // Insert a new icmp_ne or icmp_eq instruction before the branch. | |
| CondBrInst *BI = cast<CondBrInst>(ExitingBB->getTerminator()); | |
| ICmpInst::Predicate P; | |
| if (L->contains(BI->getSuccessor(0))) | |
| P = ICmpInst::ICMP_NE; | |
| else | |
| P = ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ; | |
| IRBuilder<> Builder(BI); | |
| // The new loop exit condition should reuse the debug location of the | |
| // original loop exit condition. | |
| if (auto *Cond = dyn_cast<Instruction>(BI->getCondition())) | |
| Builder.SetCurrentDebugLocation(Cond->getDebugLoc()); | |
| // For integer IVs, if we evaluated the limit in the narrower bitwidth to | |
| // avoid the expensive expansion of the limit expression in the wider type, | |
| // emit a truncate to narrow the IV to the ExitCount type. This is safe | |
| // since we know (from the exit count bitwidth), that we can't self-wrap in | |
| // the narrower type. | |
| unsigned CmpIndVarSize = SE->getTypeSizeInBits(CmpIndVar->getType()); | |
| unsigned ExitCntSize = SE->getTypeSizeInBits(ExitCnt->getType()); | |
| if (CmpIndVarSize > ExitCntSize) { | |
| assert(!CmpIndVar->getType()->isPointerTy() && | |
| !ExitCnt->getType()->isPointerTy()); | |
| // Before resorting to actually inserting the truncate, use the same | |
| // reasoning as from SimplifyIndvar::eliminateTrunc to see if we can extend | |
| // the other side of the comparison instead. We still evaluate the limit | |
| // in the narrower bitwidth, we just prefer a zext/sext outside the loop to | |
| // a truncate within in. | |
| bool Extended = false; | |
| const SCEV *IV = SE->getSCEV(CmpIndVar); | |
| const SCEV *TruncatedIV = SE->getTruncateExpr(IV, ExitCnt->getType()); | |
| const SCEV *ZExtTrunc = | |
| SE->getZeroExtendExpr(TruncatedIV, CmpIndVar->getType()); | |
| if (ZExtTrunc == IV) { | |
| Extended = true; | |
| ExitCnt = Builder.CreateZExt(ExitCnt, IndVar->getType(), | |
| "wide.trip.count"); | |
| } else { | |
| const SCEV *SExtTrunc = | |
| SE->getSignExtendExpr(TruncatedIV, CmpIndVar->getType()); | |
| if (SExtTrunc == IV) { | |
| Extended = true; | |
| ExitCnt = Builder.CreateSExt(ExitCnt, IndVar->getType(), | |
| "wide.trip.count"); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| if (Extended) { | |
| bool Discard; | |
| L->makeLoopInvariant(ExitCnt, Discard); | |
| } else | |
| CmpIndVar = Builder.CreateTrunc(CmpIndVar, ExitCnt->getType(), | |
| "lftr.wideiv"); | |
| } | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "INDVARS: Rewriting loop exit condition to:\n" | |
| << " LHS:" << *CmpIndVar << '\n' | |
| << " op:\t" << (P == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE ? "!=" : "==") | |
| << "\n" | |
| << " RHS:\t" << *ExitCnt << "\n" | |
| << "ExitCount:\t" << *ExitCount << "\n" | |
| << " was: " << *BI->getCondition() << "\n"); | |
| Value *Cond = Builder.CreateICmp(P, CmpIndVar, ExitCnt, "exitcond"); | |
| Value *OrigCond = BI->getCondition(); | |
| // It's tempting to use replaceAllUsesWith here to fully replace the old | |
| // comparison, but that's not immediately safe, since users of the old | |
| // comparison may not be dominated by the new comparison. Instead, just | |
| // update the branch to use the new comparison; in the common case this | |
| // will make old comparison dead. | |
| BI->setCondition(Cond); | |
| DeadInsts.emplace_back(OrigCond); | |
| ++NumLFTR; | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // sinkUnusedInvariants. A late subpass to cleanup loop preheaders. | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| /// If there's a single exit block, sink any loop-invariant values that | |
| /// were defined in the preheader but not used inside the loop into the | |
| /// exit block to reduce register pressure in the loop. | |
| bool IndVarSimplify::sinkUnusedInvariants(Loop *L) { | |
| BasicBlock *ExitBlock = L->getExitBlock(); | |
| if (!ExitBlock) return false; | |
| BasicBlock *Preheader = L->getLoopPreheader(); | |
| if (!Preheader) return false; | |
| bool MadeAnyChanges = false; | |
| SmallVector<Value *, 16> SunkInsts; | |
| for (Instruction &I : llvm::make_early_inc_range(llvm::reverse(*Preheader))) { | |
| // Skip BB Terminator. | |
| if (Preheader->getTerminator() == &I) | |
| continue; | |
| // New instructions were inserted at the end of the preheader. | |
| if (isa<PHINode>(I)) | |
| break; | |
| // Don't move instructions which might have side effects, since the side | |
| // effects need to complete before instructions inside the loop. Also don't | |
| // move instructions which might read memory, since the loop may modify | |
| // memory. Note that it's okay if the instruction might have undefined | |
| // behavior: LoopSimplify guarantees that the preheader dominates the exit | |
| // block. | |
| if (I.mayHaveSideEffects() || I.mayReadFromMemory()) | |
| continue; | |
| // Skip eh pad instructions. | |
| if (I.isEHPad()) | |
| continue; | |
| // Don't sink alloca: we never want to sink static alloca's out of the | |
| // entry block, and correctly sinking dynamic alloca's requires | |
| // checks for stacksave/stackrestore intrinsics. | |
| // FIXME: Refactor this check somehow? | |
| if (isa<AllocaInst>(&I)) | |
| continue; | |
| // Determine if there is a use in or before the loop (direct or | |
| // otherwise). | |
| bool UsedInLoop = false; | |
| for (Use &U : I.uses()) { | |
| Instruction *User = cast<Instruction>(U.getUser()); | |
| BasicBlock *UseBB = User->getParent(); | |
| if (PHINode *P = dyn_cast<PHINode>(User)) { | |
| unsigned i = | |
| PHINode::getIncomingValueNumForOperand(U.getOperandNo()); | |
| UseBB = P->getIncomingBlock(i); | |
| } | |
| if (UseBB == Preheader || L->contains(UseBB)) { | |
| UsedInLoop = true; | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // If there is, the def must remain in the preheader. | |
| if (UsedInLoop) | |
| continue; | |
| // Otherwise, sink it to the exit block. | |
| I.moveBefore(ExitBlock->getFirstInsertionPt()); | |
| SunkInsts.push_back(&I); | |
| MadeAnyChanges = true; | |
| } | |
| if (!SunkInsts.empty()) | |
| SE->forgetValues(SunkInsts); | |
| return MadeAnyChanges; | |
| } | |
| static void replaceExitCond(CondBrInst *BI, Value *NewCond, | |
| SmallVectorImpl<WeakTrackingVH> &DeadInsts) { | |
| auto *OldCond = BI->getCondition(); | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Replacing condition of loop-exiting branch " << *BI | |
| << " with " << *NewCond << "\n"); | |
| BI->setCondition(NewCond); | |
| if (OldCond->use_empty()) | |
| DeadInsts.emplace_back(OldCond); | |
| } | |
| static Constant *createFoldedExitCond(const Loop *L, BasicBlock *ExitingBB, | |
| bool IsTaken) { | |
| CondBrInst *BI = cast<CondBrInst>(ExitingBB->getTerminator()); | |
| bool ExitIfTrue = !L->contains(*succ_begin(ExitingBB)); | |
| auto *OldCond = BI->getCondition(); | |
| return ConstantInt::get(OldCond->getType(), | |
| IsTaken ? ExitIfTrue : !ExitIfTrue); | |
| } | |
| static void foldExit(const Loop *L, BasicBlock *ExitingBB, bool IsTaken, | |
| SmallVectorImpl<WeakTrackingVH> &DeadInsts) { | |
| CondBrInst *BI = cast<CondBrInst>(ExitingBB->getTerminator()); | |
| auto *NewCond = createFoldedExitCond(L, ExitingBB, IsTaken); | |
| replaceExitCond(BI, NewCond, DeadInsts); | |
| } | |
| static void replaceLoopPHINodesWithPreheaderValues( | |
| LoopInfo *LI, Loop *L, SmallVectorImpl<WeakTrackingVH> &DeadInsts, | |
| ScalarEvolution &SE) { | |
| assert(L->isLoopSimplifyForm() && "Should only do it in simplify form!"); | |
| auto *LoopPreheader = L->getLoopPreheader(); | |
| auto *LoopHeader = L->getHeader(); | |
| SmallVector<Instruction *> Worklist; | |
| for (auto &PN : LoopHeader->phis()) { | |
| auto *PreheaderIncoming = PN.getIncomingValueForBlock(LoopPreheader); | |
| for (User *U : PN.users()) | |
| Worklist.push_back(cast<Instruction>(U)); | |
| SE.forgetValue(&PN); | |
| PN.replaceAllUsesWith(PreheaderIncoming); | |
| DeadInsts.emplace_back(&PN); | |
| } | |
| // Replacing with the preheader value will often allow IV users to simplify | |
| // (especially if the preheader value is a constant). | |
| SmallPtrSet<Instruction *, 16> Visited; | |
| while (!Worklist.empty()) { | |
| auto *I = cast<Instruction>(Worklist.pop_back_val()); | |
| if (!Visited.insert(I).second) | |
| continue; | |
| // Don't simplify instructions outside the loop. | |
| if (!L->contains(I)) | |
| continue; | |
| Value *Res = simplifyInstruction(I, I->getDataLayout()); | |
| if (Res && LI->replacementPreservesLCSSAForm(I, Res)) { | |
| for (User *U : I->users()) | |
| Worklist.push_back(cast<Instruction>(U)); | |
| I->replaceAllUsesWith(Res); | |
| DeadInsts.emplace_back(I); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| static Value * | |
| createInvariantCond(const Loop *L, BasicBlock *ExitingBB, | |
| const ScalarEvolution::LoopInvariantPredicate &LIP, | |
| SCEVExpander &Rewriter) { | |
| ICmpInst::Predicate InvariantPred = LIP.Pred; | |
| BasicBlock *Preheader = L->getLoopPreheader(); | |
| assert(Preheader && "Preheader doesn't exist"); | |
| Rewriter.setInsertPoint(Preheader->getTerminator()); | |
| auto *LHSV = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(LIP.LHS); | |
| auto *RHSV = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(LIP.RHS); | |
| bool ExitIfTrue = !L->contains(*succ_begin(ExitingBB)); | |
| if (ExitIfTrue) | |
| InvariantPred = ICmpInst::getInversePredicate(InvariantPred); | |
| IRBuilder<> Builder(Preheader->getTerminator()); | |
| CondBrInst *BI = cast<CondBrInst>(ExitingBB->getTerminator()); | |
| return Builder.CreateICmp(InvariantPred, LHSV, RHSV, | |
| BI->getCondition()->getName()); | |
| } | |
| static std::optional<Value *> | |
| createReplacement(ICmpInst *ICmp, const Loop *L, BasicBlock *ExitingBB, | |
| const SCEV *MaxIter, bool Inverted, bool SkipLastIter, | |
| ScalarEvolution *SE, SCEVExpander &Rewriter) { | |
| CmpPredicate Pred = ICmp->getCmpPredicate(); | |
| Value *LHS = ICmp->getOperand(0); | |
| Value *RHS = ICmp->getOperand(1); | |
| // 'LHS pred RHS' should now mean that we stay in loop. | |
| auto *BI = cast<CondBrInst>(ExitingBB->getTerminator()); | |
| if (Inverted) | |
| Pred = ICmpInst::getInverseCmpPredicate(Pred); | |
| const SCEV *LHSS = SE->getSCEVAtScope(LHS, L); | |
| const SCEV *RHSS = SE->getSCEVAtScope(RHS, L); | |
| // Can we prove it to be trivially true or false? | |
| if (auto EV = SE->evaluatePredicateAt(Pred, LHSS, RHSS, BI)) | |
| return createFoldedExitCond(L, ExitingBB, /*IsTaken*/ !*EV); | |
| auto *ARTy = LHSS->getType(); | |
| auto *MaxIterTy = MaxIter->getType(); | |
| // If possible, adjust types. | |
| if (SE->getTypeSizeInBits(ARTy) > SE->getTypeSizeInBits(MaxIterTy)) | |
| MaxIter = SE->getZeroExtendExpr(MaxIter, ARTy); | |
| else if (SE->getTypeSizeInBits(ARTy) < SE->getTypeSizeInBits(MaxIterTy)) { | |
| const SCEV *MinusOne = SE->getMinusOne(ARTy); | |
| const SCEV *MaxAllowedIter = SE->getZeroExtendExpr(MinusOne, MaxIterTy); | |
| if (SE->isKnownPredicateAt(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE, MaxIter, MaxAllowedIter, BI)) | |
| MaxIter = SE->getTruncateExpr(MaxIter, ARTy); | |
| } | |
| if (SkipLastIter) { | |
| // Semantically skip last iter is "subtract 1, do not bother about unsigned | |
| // wrap". getLoopInvariantExitCondDuringFirstIterations knows how to deal | |
| // with umin in a smart way, but umin(a, b) - 1 will likely not simplify. | |
| // So we manually construct umin(a - 1, b - 1). | |
| SmallVector<SCEVUse, 4> Elements; | |
| if (auto *UMin = dyn_cast<SCEVUMinExpr>(MaxIter)) { | |
| for (SCEVUse Op : UMin->operands()) | |
| Elements.push_back(SE->getMinusSCEV(Op, SE->getOne(Op->getType()))); | |
| MaxIter = SE->getUMinFromMismatchedTypes(Elements); | |
| } else | |
| MaxIter = SE->getMinusSCEV(MaxIter, SE->getOne(MaxIter->getType())); | |
| } | |
| // Check if there is a loop-invariant predicate equivalent to our check. | |
| auto LIP = SE->getLoopInvariantExitCondDuringFirstIterations(Pred, LHSS, RHSS, | |
| L, BI, MaxIter); | |
| if (!LIP) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| // Can we prove it to be trivially true? | |
| if (SE->isKnownPredicateAt(LIP->Pred, LIP->LHS, LIP->RHS, BI)) | |
| return createFoldedExitCond(L, ExitingBB, /*IsTaken*/ false); | |
| else | |
| return createInvariantCond(L, ExitingBB, *LIP, Rewriter); | |
| } | |
| static bool optimizeLoopExitWithUnknownExitCount( | |
| const Loop *L, CondBrInst *BI, BasicBlock *ExitingBB, const SCEV *MaxIter, | |
| bool SkipLastIter, ScalarEvolution *SE, SCEVExpander &Rewriter, | |
| SmallVectorImpl<WeakTrackingVH> &DeadInsts) { | |
| assert( | |
| (L->contains(BI->getSuccessor(0)) != L->contains(BI->getSuccessor(1))) && | |
| "Not a loop exit!"); | |
| // For branch that stays in loop by TRUE condition, go through AND. For branch | |
| // that stays in loop by FALSE condition, go through OR. Both gives the | |
| // similar logic: "stay in loop iff all conditions are true(false)". | |
| bool Inverted = L->contains(BI->getSuccessor(1)); | |
| SmallVector<ICmpInst *, 4> LeafConditions; | |
| SmallVector<Value *, 4> Worklist; | |
| SmallPtrSet<Value *, 4> Visited; | |
| Value *OldCond = BI->getCondition(); | |
| Visited.insert(OldCond); | |
| Worklist.push_back(OldCond); | |
| auto GoThrough = [&](Value *V) { | |
| Value *LHS = nullptr, *RHS = nullptr; | |
| if (Inverted) { | |
| if (!match(V, m_LogicalOr(m_Value(LHS), m_Value(RHS)))) | |
| return false; | |
| } else { | |
| if (!match(V, m_LogicalAnd(m_Value(LHS), m_Value(RHS)))) | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| if (Visited.insert(LHS).second) | |
| Worklist.push_back(LHS); | |
| if (Visited.insert(RHS).second) | |
| Worklist.push_back(RHS); | |
| return true; | |
| }; | |
| do { | |
| Value *Curr = Worklist.pop_back_val(); | |
| // Go through AND/OR conditions. Collect leaf ICMPs. We only care about | |
| // those with one use, to avoid instruction duplication. | |
| if (Curr->hasOneUse()) | |
| if (!GoThrough(Curr)) | |
| if (auto *ICmp = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(Curr)) | |
| LeafConditions.push_back(ICmp); | |
| } while (!Worklist.empty()); | |
| // If the current basic block has the same exit count as the whole loop, and | |
| // it consists of multiple icmp's, try to collect all icmp's that give exact | |
| // same exit count. For all other icmp's, we could use one less iteration, | |
| // because their value on the last iteration doesn't really matter. | |
| SmallPtrSet<ICmpInst *, 4> ICmpsFailingOnLastIter; | |
| if (!SkipLastIter && LeafConditions.size() > 1 && | |
| SE->getExitCount(L, ExitingBB, | |
| ScalarEvolution::ExitCountKind::SymbolicMaximum) == | |
| MaxIter) | |
| for (auto *ICmp : LeafConditions) { | |
| auto EL = SE->computeExitLimitFromCond(L, ICmp, Inverted, | |
| /*ControlsExit*/ false); | |
| const SCEV *ExitMax = EL.SymbolicMaxNotTaken; | |
| if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(ExitMax)) | |
| continue; | |
| // They could be of different types (specifically this happens after | |
| // IV widening). | |
| auto *WiderType = | |
| SE->getWiderType(ExitMax->getType(), MaxIter->getType()); | |
| const SCEV *WideExitMax = SE->getNoopOrZeroExtend(ExitMax, WiderType); | |
| const SCEV *WideMaxIter = SE->getNoopOrZeroExtend(MaxIter, WiderType); | |
| if (WideExitMax == WideMaxIter) | |
| ICmpsFailingOnLastIter.insert(ICmp); | |
| } | |
| bool Changed = false; | |
| for (auto *OldCond : LeafConditions) { | |
| // Skip last iteration for this icmp under one of two conditions: | |
| // - We do it for all conditions; | |
| // - There is another ICmp that would fail on last iter, so this one doesn't | |
| // really matter. | |
| bool OptimisticSkipLastIter = SkipLastIter; | |
| if (!OptimisticSkipLastIter) { | |
| if (ICmpsFailingOnLastIter.size() > 1) | |
| OptimisticSkipLastIter = true; | |
| else if (ICmpsFailingOnLastIter.size() == 1) | |
| OptimisticSkipLastIter = !ICmpsFailingOnLastIter.count(OldCond); | |
| } | |
| if (auto Replaced = | |
| createReplacement(OldCond, L, ExitingBB, MaxIter, Inverted, | |
| OptimisticSkipLastIter, SE, Rewriter)) { | |
| Changed = true; | |
| auto *NewCond = *Replaced; | |
| if (auto *NCI = dyn_cast<Instruction>(NewCond)) { | |
| NCI->setName(OldCond->getName() + ".first_iter"); | |
| } | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Unknown exit count: Replacing " << *OldCond | |
| << " with " << *NewCond << "\n"); | |
| assert(OldCond->hasOneUse() && "Must be!"); | |
| OldCond->replaceAllUsesWith(NewCond); | |
| DeadInsts.push_back(OldCond); | |
| // Make sure we no longer consider this condition as failing on last | |
| // iteration. | |
| ICmpsFailingOnLastIter.erase(OldCond); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return Changed; | |
| } | |
| bool IndVarSimplify::canonicalizeExitCondition(Loop *L) { | |
| // Note: This is duplicating a particular part on SimplifyIndVars reasoning. | |
| // We need to duplicate it because given icmp zext(small-iv), C, IVUsers | |
| // never reaches the icmp since the zext doesn't fold to an AddRec unless | |
| // it already has flags. The alternative to this would be to extending the | |
| // set of "interesting" IV users to include the icmp, but doing that | |
| // regresses results in practice by querying SCEVs before trip counts which | |
| // rely on them which results in SCEV caching sub-optimal answers. The | |
| // concern about caching sub-optimal results is why we only query SCEVs of | |
| // the loop invariant RHS here. | |
| SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 16> ExitingBlocks; | |
| L->getExitingBlocks(ExitingBlocks); | |
| bool Changed = false; | |
| for (auto *ExitingBB : ExitingBlocks) { | |
| auto *BI = dyn_cast<CondBrInst>(ExitingBB->getTerminator()); | |
| if (!BI) | |
| continue; | |
| auto *ICmp = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(BI->getCondition()); | |
| if (!ICmp || !ICmp->hasOneUse()) | |
| continue; | |
| auto *LHS = ICmp->getOperand(0); | |
| auto *RHS = ICmp->getOperand(1); | |
| // For the range reasoning, avoid computing SCEVs in the loop to avoid | |
| // poisoning cache with sub-optimal results. For the must-execute case, | |
| // this is a neccessary precondition for correctness. | |
| if (!L->isLoopInvariant(RHS)) { | |
| if (!L->isLoopInvariant(LHS)) | |
| continue; | |
| // Same logic applies for the inverse case | |
| std::swap(LHS, RHS); | |
| } | |
| // Match (icmp signed-cond zext, RHS) | |
| Value *LHSOp = nullptr; | |
| if (!match(LHS, m_ZExt(m_Value(LHSOp))) || !ICmp->isSigned()) | |
| continue; | |
| const unsigned InnerBitWidth = DL.getTypeSizeInBits(LHSOp->getType()); | |
| const unsigned OuterBitWidth = DL.getTypeSizeInBits(RHS->getType()); | |
| auto FullCR = ConstantRange::getFull(InnerBitWidth); | |
| FullCR = FullCR.zeroExtend(OuterBitWidth); | |
| auto RHSCR = SE->getUnsignedRange(SE->applyLoopGuards(SE->getSCEV(RHS), L)); | |
| if (FullCR.contains(RHSCR)) { | |
| // We have now matched icmp signed-cond zext(X), zext(Y'), and can thus | |
| // replace the signed condition with the unsigned version. | |
| ICmp->setPredicate(ICmp->getUnsignedPredicate()); | |
| Changed = true; | |
| // Note: No SCEV invalidation needed. We've changed the predicate, but | |
| // have not changed exit counts, or the values produced by the compare. | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // Now that we've canonicalized the condition to match the extend, | |
| // see if we can rotate the extend out of the loop. | |
| for (auto *ExitingBB : ExitingBlocks) { | |
| auto *BI = dyn_cast<CondBrInst>(ExitingBB->getTerminator()); | |
| if (!BI) | |
| continue; | |
| auto *ICmp = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(BI->getCondition()); | |
| if (!ICmp || !ICmp->hasOneUse() || !ICmp->isUnsigned()) | |
| continue; | |
| bool Swapped = false; | |
| auto *LHS = ICmp->getOperand(0); | |
| auto *RHS = ICmp->getOperand(1); | |
| if (L->isLoopInvariant(LHS) == L->isLoopInvariant(RHS)) | |
| // Nothing to rotate | |
| continue; | |
| if (L->isLoopInvariant(LHS)) { | |
| // Same logic applies for the inverse case until we actually pick | |
| // which operand of the compare to update. | |
| Swapped = true; | |
| std::swap(LHS, RHS); | |
| } | |
| assert(!L->isLoopInvariant(LHS) && L->isLoopInvariant(RHS)); | |
| // Match (icmp unsigned-cond zext, RHS) | |
| // TODO: Extend to handle corresponding sext/signed-cmp case | |
| // TODO: Extend to other invertible functions | |
| Value *LHSOp = nullptr; | |
| if (!match(LHS, m_ZExt(m_Value(LHSOp)))) | |
| continue; | |
| // In general, we only rotate if we can do so without increasing the number | |
| // of instructions. The exception is when we have an zext(add-rec). The | |
| // reason for allowing this exception is that we know we need to get rid | |
| // of the zext for SCEV to be able to compute a trip count for said loops; | |
| // we consider the new trip count valuable enough to increase instruction | |
| // count by one. | |
| if (!LHS->hasOneUse() && !isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE->getSCEV(LHSOp))) | |
| continue; | |
| // Given a icmp unsigned-cond zext(Op) where zext(trunc(RHS)) == RHS | |
| // replace with an icmp of the form icmp unsigned-cond Op, trunc(RHS) | |
| // when zext is loop varying and RHS is loop invariant. This converts | |
| // loop varying work to loop-invariant work. | |
| auto doRotateTransform = [&]() { | |
| assert(ICmp->isUnsigned() && "must have proven unsigned already"); | |
| auto *NewRHS = CastInst::Create( | |
| Instruction::Trunc, RHS, LHSOp->getType(), "", | |
| L->getLoopPreheader()->getTerminator()->getIterator()); | |
| // NewRHS is an operation that has been hoisted out of the loop, and | |
| // therefore should have a dropped location. | |
| NewRHS->setDebugLoc(DebugLoc::getDropped()); | |
| ICmp->setOperand(Swapped ? 1 : 0, LHSOp); | |
| ICmp->setOperand(Swapped ? 0 : 1, NewRHS); | |
| // Samesign flag cannot be preserved after narrowing the compare. | |
| ICmp->setSameSign(false); | |
| if (LHS->use_empty()) | |
| DeadInsts.push_back(LHS); | |
| }; | |
| const unsigned InnerBitWidth = DL.getTypeSizeInBits(LHSOp->getType()); | |
| const unsigned OuterBitWidth = DL.getTypeSizeInBits(RHS->getType()); | |
| auto FullCR = ConstantRange::getFull(InnerBitWidth); | |
| FullCR = FullCR.zeroExtend(OuterBitWidth); | |
| auto RHSCR = SE->getUnsignedRange(SE->applyLoopGuards(SE->getSCEV(RHS), L)); | |
| if (FullCR.contains(RHSCR)) { | |
| doRotateTransform(); | |
| Changed = true; | |
| // Note, we are leaving SCEV in an unfortunately imprecise case here | |
| // as rotation tends to reveal information about trip counts not | |
| // previously visible. | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return Changed; | |
| } | |
| bool IndVarSimplify::optimizeLoopExits(Loop *L, SCEVExpander &Rewriter) { | |
| SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 16> ExitingBlocks; | |
| L->getExitingBlocks(ExitingBlocks); | |
| // Remove all exits which aren't both rewriteable and execute on every | |
| // iteration. | |
| llvm::erase_if(ExitingBlocks, [&](BasicBlock *ExitingBB) { | |
| // If our exitting block exits multiple loops, we can only rewrite the | |
| // innermost one. Otherwise, we're changing how many times the innermost | |
| // loop runs before it exits. | |
| if (LI->getLoopFor(ExitingBB) != L) | |
| return true; | |
| // Can't rewrite non-branch yet. | |
| CondBrInst *BI = dyn_cast<CondBrInst>(ExitingBB->getTerminator()); | |
| if (!BI) | |
| return true; | |
| // Likewise, the loop latch must be dominated by the exiting BB. | |
| if (!DT->dominates(ExitingBB, L->getLoopLatch())) | |
| return true; | |
| if (auto *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(BI->getCondition())) { | |
| // If already constant, nothing to do. However, if this is an | |
| // unconditional exit, we can still replace header phis with their | |
| // preheader value. | |
| if (!L->contains(BI->getSuccessor(CI->isNullValue()))) | |
| replaceLoopPHINodesWithPreheaderValues(LI, L, DeadInsts, *SE); | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| }); | |
| if (ExitingBlocks.empty()) | |
| return false; | |
| // Get a symbolic upper bound on the loop backedge taken count. | |
| const SCEV *MaxBECount = SE->getSymbolicMaxBackedgeTakenCount(L); | |
| if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(MaxBECount)) | |
| return false; | |
| // Visit our exit blocks in order of dominance. We know from the fact that | |
| // all exits must dominate the latch, so there is a total dominance order | |
| // between them. | |
| llvm::sort(ExitingBlocks, [&](BasicBlock *A, BasicBlock *B) { | |
| // std::sort sorts in ascending order, so we want the inverse of | |
| // the normal dominance relation. | |
| if (A == B) return false; | |
| if (DT->properlyDominates(A, B)) | |
| return true; | |
| else { | |
| assert(DT->properlyDominates(B, A) && | |
| "expected total dominance order!"); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| #ifdef ASSERT | |
| for (unsigned i = 1; i < ExitingBlocks.size(); i++) { | |
| assert(DT->dominates(ExitingBlocks[i-1], ExitingBlocks[i])); | |
| } | |
| #endif | |
| bool Changed = false; | |
| bool SkipLastIter = false; | |
| const SCEV *CurrMaxExit = SE->getCouldNotCompute(); | |
| auto UpdateSkipLastIter = [&](const SCEV *MaxExitCount) { | |
| if (SkipLastIter || isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(MaxExitCount)) | |
| return; | |
| if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(CurrMaxExit)) | |
| CurrMaxExit = MaxExitCount; | |
| else | |
| CurrMaxExit = SE->getUMinFromMismatchedTypes(CurrMaxExit, MaxExitCount); | |
| // If the loop has more than 1 iteration, all further checks will be | |
| // executed 1 iteration less. | |
| if (CurrMaxExit == MaxBECount) | |
| SkipLastIter = true; | |
| }; | |
| SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 8> DominatingExactExitCounts; | |
| for (BasicBlock *ExitingBB : ExitingBlocks) { | |
| const SCEV *ExactExitCount = SE->getExitCount(L, ExitingBB); | |
| const SCEV *MaxExitCount = SE->getExitCount( | |
| L, ExitingBB, ScalarEvolution::ExitCountKind::SymbolicMaximum); | |
| if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(ExactExitCount)) { | |
| // Okay, we do not know the exit count here. Can we at least prove that it | |
| // will remain the same within iteration space? | |
| auto *BI = cast<CondBrInst>(ExitingBB->getTerminator()); | |
| auto OptimizeCond = [&](bool SkipLastIter) { | |
| return optimizeLoopExitWithUnknownExitCount(L, BI, ExitingBB, | |
| MaxBECount, SkipLastIter, | |
| SE, Rewriter, DeadInsts); | |
| }; | |
| // TODO: We might have proved that we can skip the last iteration for | |
| // this check. In this case, we only want to check the condition on the | |
| // pre-last iteration (MaxBECount - 1). However, there is a nasty | |
| // corner case: | |
| // | |
| // for (i = len; i != 0; i--) { ... check (i ult X) ... } | |
| // | |
| // If we could not prove that len != 0, then we also could not prove that | |
| // (len - 1) is not a UINT_MAX. If we simply query (len - 1), then | |
| // OptimizeCond will likely not prove anything for it, even if it could | |
| // prove the same fact for len. | |
| // | |
| // As a temporary solution, we query both last and pre-last iterations in | |
| // hope that we will be able to prove triviality for at least one of | |
| // them. We can stop querying MaxBECount for this case once SCEV | |
| // understands that (MaxBECount - 1) will not overflow here. | |
| if (OptimizeCond(false)) | |
| Changed = true; | |
| else if (SkipLastIter && OptimizeCond(true)) | |
| Changed = true; | |
| UpdateSkipLastIter(MaxExitCount); | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| UpdateSkipLastIter(ExactExitCount); | |
| // If we know we'd exit on the first iteration, rewrite the exit to | |
| // reflect this. This does not imply the loop must exit through this | |
| // exit; there may be an earlier one taken on the first iteration. | |
| // We know that the backedge can't be taken, so we replace all | |
| // the header PHIs with values coming from the preheader. | |
| if (ExactExitCount->isZero()) { | |
| foldExit(L, ExitingBB, true, DeadInsts); | |
| replaceLoopPHINodesWithPreheaderValues(LI, L, DeadInsts, *SE); | |
| Changed = true; | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| assert(ExactExitCount->getType()->isIntegerTy() && | |
| MaxBECount->getType()->isIntegerTy() && | |
| "Exit counts must be integers"); | |
| Type *WiderType = | |
| SE->getWiderType(MaxBECount->getType(), ExactExitCount->getType()); | |
| ExactExitCount = SE->getNoopOrZeroExtend(ExactExitCount, WiderType); | |
| MaxBECount = SE->getNoopOrZeroExtend(MaxBECount, WiderType); | |
| assert(MaxBECount->getType() == ExactExitCount->getType()); | |
| // Can we prove that some other exit must be taken strictly before this | |
| // one? | |
| if (SE->isLoopEntryGuardedByCond(L, CmpInst::ICMP_ULT, MaxBECount, | |
| ExactExitCount)) { | |
| foldExit(L, ExitingBB, false, DeadInsts); | |
| Changed = true; | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| // As we run, keep track of which exit counts we've encountered. If we | |
| // find a duplicate, we've found an exit which would have exited on the | |
| // exiting iteration, but (from the visit order) strictly follows another | |
| // which does the same and is thus dead. | |
| if (!DominatingExactExitCounts.insert(ExactExitCount).second) { | |
| foldExit(L, ExitingBB, false, DeadInsts); | |
| Changed = true; | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| // TODO: There might be another oppurtunity to leverage SCEV's reasoning | |
| // here. If we kept track of the min of dominanting exits so far, we could | |
| // discharge exits with EC >= MDEC. This is less powerful than the existing | |
| // transform (since later exits aren't considered), but potentially more | |
| // powerful for any case where SCEV can prove a >=u b, but neither a == b | |
| // or a >u b. Such a case is not currently known. | |
| } | |
| return Changed; | |
| } | |
| static bool crashingBBWithoutEffect(const BasicBlock &BB) { | |
| return llvm::all_of(BB, [](const Instruction &I) { | |
| // TODO: for now this is overly restrictive, to make sure nothing in this | |
| // BB can depend on the loop body. | |
| // It's not enough to check for !I.mayHaveSideEffects(), because e.g. a | |
| // load does not have a side effect, but we could have | |
| // %a = load ptr, ptr %ptr | |
| // %b = load i32, ptr %a | |
| // Now if the loop stored a non-nullptr to %a, we could cause a nullptr | |
| // dereference by skipping over loop iterations. | |
| if (const auto *CB = dyn_cast<CallBase>(&I)) { | |
| if (CB->onlyAccessesInaccessibleMemory()) | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| return isa<UnreachableInst>(I); | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| bool IndVarSimplify::predicateLoopExits(Loop *L, SCEVExpander &Rewriter) { | |
| SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 16> ExitingBlocks; | |
| L->getExitingBlocks(ExitingBlocks); | |
| // Finally, see if we can rewrite our exit conditions into a loop invariant | |
| // form. If we have a read-only loop, and we can tell that we must exit down | |
| // a path which does not need any of the values computed within the loop, we | |
| // can rewrite the loop to exit on the first iteration. Note that this | |
| // doesn't either a) tell us the loop exits on the first iteration (unless | |
| // *all* exits are predicateable) or b) tell us *which* exit might be taken. | |
| // This transformation looks a lot like a restricted form of dead loop | |
| // elimination, but restricted to read-only loops and without neccesssarily | |
| // needing to kill the loop entirely. | |
| if (!Opts.indvars_predicate_loops) | |
| return false; | |
| // Note: ExactBTC is the exact backedge taken count *iff* the loop exits | |
| // through *explicit* control flow. We have to eliminate the possibility of | |
| // implicit exits (see below) before we know it's truly exact. | |
| const SCEV *ExactBTC = SE->getBackedgeTakenCount(L); | |
| if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(ExactBTC) || !Rewriter.isSafeToExpand(ExactBTC)) | |
| return false; | |
| assert(SE->isLoopInvariant(ExactBTC, L) && "BTC must be loop invariant"); | |
| assert(ExactBTC->getType()->isIntegerTy() && "BTC must be integer"); | |
| auto BadExit = [&](BasicBlock *ExitingBB) { | |
| // If our exiting block exits multiple loops, we can only rewrite the | |
| // innermost one. Otherwise, we're changing how many times the innermost | |
| // loop runs before it exits. | |
| if (LI->getLoopFor(ExitingBB) != L) | |
| return true; | |
| // Can't rewrite non-branch yet. | |
| CondBrInst *BI = dyn_cast<CondBrInst>(ExitingBB->getTerminator()); | |
| if (!BI) | |
| return true; | |
| // If already constant, nothing to do. | |
| if (isa<Constant>(BI->getCondition())) | |
| return true; | |
| // If the exit block has phis, we need to be able to compute the values | |
| // within the loop which contains them. This assumes trivially lcssa phis | |
| // have already been removed; TODO: generalize | |
| BasicBlock *ExitBlock = | |
| BI->getSuccessor(L->contains(BI->getSuccessor(0)) ? 1 : 0); | |
| if (!ExitBlock->phis().empty()) | |
| return true; | |
| const SCEV *ExitCount = SE->getExitCount(L, ExitingBB); | |
| if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(ExitCount) || | |
| !Rewriter.isSafeToExpand(ExitCount)) | |
| return true; | |
| assert(SE->isLoopInvariant(ExitCount, L) && | |
| "Exit count must be loop invariant"); | |
| assert(ExitCount->getType()->isIntegerTy() && "Exit count must be integer"); | |
| return false; | |
| }; | |
| // Make sure all exits dominate the latch. This means there is a linear chain | |
| // of exits. We check this before sorting so we have a total order. | |
| BasicBlock *Latch = L->getLoopLatch(); | |
| for (BasicBlock *ExitingBB : ExitingBlocks) | |
| if (!DT->dominates(ExitingBB, Latch)) | |
| return false; | |
| // If we have any exits which can't be predicated themselves, than we can't | |
| // predicate any exit which isn't guaranteed to execute before it. Consider | |
| // two exits (a) and (b) which would both exit on the same iteration. If we | |
| // can predicate (b), but not (a), and (a) preceeds (b) along some path, then | |
| // we could convert a loop from exiting through (a) to one exiting through | |
| // (b). Note that this problem exists only for exits with the same exit | |
| // count, and we could be more aggressive when exit counts are known inequal. | |
| llvm::sort(ExitingBlocks, [&](BasicBlock *A, BasicBlock *B) { | |
| // llvm::sort sorts in ascending order, so we want the inverse of | |
| // the normal dominance relation. | |
| if (A == B) | |
| return false; | |
| if (DT->properlyDominates(A, B)) | |
| return true; | |
| if (DT->properlyDominates(B, A)) | |
| return false; | |
| llvm_unreachable("Should have total dominance order"); | |
| }); | |
| // Make sure our exit blocks are really a total order (i.e. a linear chain of | |
| // exits before the backedge). | |
| for (unsigned i = 1; i < ExitingBlocks.size(); i++) | |
| assert(DT->dominates(ExitingBlocks[i - 1], ExitingBlocks[i]) && | |
| "Not sorted by dominance"); | |
| // Given our sorted total order, we know that exit[j] must be evaluated | |
| // after all exit[i] such j > i. | |
| for (unsigned i = 0, e = ExitingBlocks.size(); i < e; i++) | |
| if (BadExit(ExitingBlocks[i])) { | |
| ExitingBlocks.resize(i); | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| if (ExitingBlocks.empty()) | |
| return false; | |
| // At this point, ExitingBlocks consists of only those blocks which are | |
| // predicatable. Given that, we know we have at least one exit we can | |
| // predicate if the loop is doesn't have side effects and doesn't have any | |
| // implicit exits (because then our exact BTC isn't actually exact). | |
| // @Reviewers - As structured, this is O(I^2) for loop nests. Any | |
| // suggestions on how to improve this? I can obviously bail out for outer | |
| // loops, but that seems less than ideal. MemorySSA can find memory writes, | |
| // is that enough for *all* side effects? | |
| bool HasThreadLocalSideEffects = false; | |
| for (BasicBlock *BB : L->blocks()) | |
| for (auto &I : *BB) { | |
| // TODO:isGuaranteedToTransfer | |
| if (I.mayHaveSideEffects()) { | |
| if (!Opts.indvars_predicate_loop_traps) | |
| return false; | |
| HasThreadLocalSideEffects = true; | |
| if (StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(&I)) { | |
| // Simple stores cannot be observed by other threads. | |
| // If HasThreadLocalSideEffects is set, we check | |
| // crashingBBWithoutEffect to make sure that the crashing BB cannot | |
| // observe them either. | |
| if (!SI->isSimple()) | |
| return false; | |
| } else { | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // Skip if the loop has tokens referenced outside the loop to avoid | |
| // changing convergence behavior. | |
| if (I.getType()->isTokenTy()) { | |
| for (User *U : I.users()) { | |
| Instruction *UserInst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(U); | |
| if (UserInst && !L->contains(UserInst)) { | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| bool Changed = false; | |
| // Finally, do the actual predication for all predicatable blocks. A couple | |
| // of notes here: | |
| // 1) We don't bother to constant fold dominated exits with identical exit | |
| // counts; that's simply a form of CSE/equality propagation and we leave | |
| // it for dedicated passes. | |
| // 2) We insert the comparison at the branch. Hoisting introduces additional | |
| // legality constraints and we leave that to dedicated logic. We want to | |
| // predicate even if we can't insert a loop invariant expression as | |
| // peeling or unrolling will likely reduce the cost of the otherwise loop | |
| // varying check. | |
| Rewriter.setInsertPoint(L->getLoopPreheader()->getTerminator()); | |
| IRBuilder<> B(L->getLoopPreheader()->getTerminator()); | |
| Value *ExactBTCV = nullptr; // Lazily generated if needed. | |
| for (BasicBlock *ExitingBB : ExitingBlocks) { | |
| const SCEV *ExitCount = SE->getExitCount(L, ExitingBB); | |
| auto *BI = cast<CondBrInst>(ExitingBB->getTerminator()); | |
| if (HasThreadLocalSideEffects) { | |
| const BasicBlock *Unreachable = nullptr; | |
| for (const BasicBlock *Succ : BI->successors()) { | |
| if (isa<UnreachableInst>(Succ->getTerminator())) | |
| Unreachable = Succ; | |
| } | |
| // Exit BB which have one branch back into the loop and another one to | |
| // a trap can still be optimized, because local side effects cannot | |
| // be observed in the exit case (the trap). We could be smarter about | |
| // this, but for now lets pattern match common cases that directly trap. | |
| if (Unreachable == nullptr || !crashingBBWithoutEffect(*Unreachable)) | |
| return Changed; | |
| } | |
| Value *NewCond; | |
| if (ExitCount == ExactBTC) { | |
| NewCond = L->contains(BI->getSuccessor(0)) ? | |
| B.getFalse() : B.getTrue(); | |
| } else { | |
| Value *ECV = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(ExitCount); | |
| if (!ExactBTCV) | |
| ExactBTCV = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(ExactBTC); | |
| Value *RHS = ExactBTCV; | |
| if (ECV->getType() != RHS->getType()) { | |
| Type *WiderTy = SE->getWiderType(ECV->getType(), RHS->getType()); | |
| ECV = B.CreateZExt(ECV, WiderTy); | |
| RHS = B.CreateZExt(RHS, WiderTy); | |
| } | |
| auto Pred = L->contains(BI->getSuccessor(0)) ? | |
| ICmpInst::ICMP_NE : ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ; | |
| NewCond = B.CreateICmp(Pred, ECV, RHS); | |
| } | |
| Value *OldCond = BI->getCondition(); | |
| BI->setCondition(NewCond); | |
| if (OldCond->use_empty()) | |
| DeadInsts.emplace_back(OldCond); | |
| Changed = true; | |
| RunUnswitching = true; | |
| } | |
| return Changed; | |
| } | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // IndVarSimplify driver. Manage several subpasses of IV simplification. | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| bool IndVarSimplify::run(Loop *L) { | |
| // We need (and expect!) the incoming loop to be in LCSSA. | |
| assert(L->isRecursivelyLCSSAForm(*DT, *LI) && | |
| "LCSSA required to run indvars!"); | |
| // If LoopSimplify form is not available, stay out of trouble. Some notes: | |
| // - LSR currently only supports LoopSimplify-form loops. Indvars' | |
| // canonicalization can be a pessimization without LSR to "clean up" | |
| // afterwards. | |
| // - We depend on having a preheader; in particular, | |
| // Loop::getCanonicalInductionVariable only supports loops with preheaders, | |
| // and we're in trouble if we can't find the induction variable even when | |
| // we've manually inserted one. | |
| // - LFTR relies on having a single backedge. | |
| if (!L->isLoopSimplifyForm()) | |
| return false; | |
| bool Changed = false; | |
| // If there are any floating-point recurrences, attempt to | |
| // transform them to use integer recurrences. | |
| Changed |= rewriteNonIntegerIVs(L); | |
| // Create a rewriter object which we'll use to transform the code with. | |
| SCEVExpander Rewriter(*SE, "indvars"); | |
| #if LLVM_ENABLE_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS | |
| Rewriter.setDebugType(DEBUG_TYPE); | |
| #endif | |
| // Eliminate redundant IV users. | |
| // | |
| // Simplification works best when run before other consumers of SCEV. We | |
| // attempt to avoid evaluating SCEVs for sign/zero extend operations until | |
| // other expressions involving loop IVs have been evaluated. This helps SCEV | |
| // set no-wrap flags before normalizing sign/zero extension. | |
| Rewriter.disableCanonicalMode(); | |
| Changed |= simplifyAndExtend(L, Rewriter, LI); | |
| // Check to see if we can compute the final value of any expressions | |
| // that are recurrent in the loop, and substitute the exit values from the | |
| // loop into any instructions outside of the loop that use the final values | |
| // of the current expressions. | |
| if (Opts.replexitval != NeverRepl) { | |
| if (int Rewrites = rewriteLoopExitValues(L, LI, TLI, SE, TTI, Rewriter, DT, | |
| Opts.replexitval, DeadInsts)) { | |
| NumReplaced += Rewrites; | |
| Changed = true; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // Eliminate redundant IV cycles. | |
| NumElimIV += Rewriter.replaceCongruentIVs(L, DT, DeadInsts, TTI); | |
| // Try to convert exit conditions to unsigned and rotate computation | |
| // out of the loop. Note: Handles invalidation internally if needed. | |
| Changed |= canonicalizeExitCondition(L); | |
| // Try to eliminate loop exits based on analyzeable exit counts | |
| if (optimizeLoopExits(L, Rewriter)) { | |
| Changed = true; | |
| // Given we've changed exit counts, notify SCEV | |
| // Some nested loops may share same folded exit basic block, | |
| // thus we need to notify top most loop. | |
| SE->forgetTopmostLoop(L); | |
| } | |
| // Try to form loop invariant tests for loop exits by changing how many | |
| // iterations of the loop run when that is unobservable. | |
| if (predicateLoopExits(L, Rewriter)) { | |
| Changed = true; | |
| // Given we've changed exit counts, notify SCEV | |
| SE->forgetLoop(L); | |
| } | |
| // If we have a trip count expression, rewrite the loop's exit condition | |
| // using it. | |
| if (!Opts.disable_lftr) { | |
| BasicBlock *PreHeader = L->getLoopPreheader(); | |
| SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 16> ExitingBlocks; | |
| L->getExitingBlocks(ExitingBlocks); | |
| for (BasicBlock *ExitingBB : ExitingBlocks) { | |
| // Can't rewrite non-branch yet. | |
| if (!isa<CondBrInst>(ExitingBB->getTerminator())) | |
| continue; | |
| // If our exitting block exits multiple loops, we can only rewrite the | |
| // innermost one. Otherwise, we're changing how many times the innermost | |
| // loop runs before it exits. | |
| if (LI->getLoopFor(ExitingBB) != L) | |
| continue; | |
| if (!needsLFTR(L, ExitingBB)) | |
| continue; | |
| const SCEV *ExitCount = SE->getExitCount(L, ExitingBB); | |
| if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(ExitCount)) | |
| continue; | |
| // This was handled above, but as we form SCEVs, we can sometimes refine | |
| // existing ones; this allows exit counts to be folded to zero which | |
| // weren't when optimizeLoopExits saw them. Arguably, we should iterate | |
| // until stable to handle cases like this better. | |
| if (ExitCount->isZero()) | |
| continue; | |
| PHINode *IndVar = FindLoopCounter(L, ExitingBB, ExitCount, SE, DT); | |
| if (!IndVar) | |
| continue; | |
| // Avoid high cost expansions. Note: This heuristic is questionable in | |
| // that our definition of "high cost" is not exactly principled. | |
| if (Rewriter.isHighCostExpansion(ExitCount, L, SCEVCheapExpansionBudget, | |
| TTI, PreHeader->getTerminator())) | |
| continue; | |
| if (!Rewriter.isSafeToExpand(ExitCount)) | |
| continue; | |
| Changed |= linearFunctionTestReplace(L, ExitingBB, | |
| ExitCount, IndVar, | |
| Rewriter); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // Clear the rewriter cache, because values that are in the rewriter's cache | |
| // can be deleted in the loop below, causing the AssertingVH in the cache to | |
| // trigger. | |
| Rewriter.clear(); | |
| // Now that we're done iterating through lists, clean up any instructions | |
| // which are now dead. | |
| while (!DeadInsts.empty()) { | |
| Value *V = DeadInsts.pop_back_val(); | |
| if (PHINode *PHI = dyn_cast_or_null<PHINode>(V)) | |
| Changed |= RecursivelyDeleteDeadPHINode(PHI, TLI, MSSAU.get()); | |
| else if (Instruction *Inst = dyn_cast_or_null<Instruction>(V)) | |
| Changed |= | |
| RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(Inst, TLI, MSSAU.get()); | |
| } | |
| // The Rewriter may not be used from this point on. | |
| // Loop-invariant instructions in the preheader that aren't used in the | |
| // loop may be sunk below the loop to reduce register pressure. | |
| Changed |= sinkUnusedInvariants(L); | |
| // rewriteFirstIterationLoopExitValues does not rely on the computation of | |
| // trip count and therefore can further simplify exit values in addition to | |
| // rewriteLoopExitValues. | |
| Changed |= rewriteFirstIterationLoopExitValues(L); | |
| // Clean up dead instructions. | |
| Changed |= DeleteDeadPHIs(L->getHeader(), TLI, MSSAU.get()); | |
| // Check a post-condition. | |
| assert(L->isRecursivelyLCSSAForm(*DT, *LI) && | |
| "Indvars did not preserve LCSSA!"); | |
| if (VerifyMemorySSA && MSSAU) | |
| MSSAU->getMemorySSA()->verifyMemorySSA(); | |
| return Changed; | |
| } | |
| PreservedAnalyses IndVarSimplifyPass::run(Loop &L, LoopAnalysisManager &AM, | |
| LoopStandardAnalysisResults &AR, | |
| LPMUpdater &) { | |
| Function *F = L.getHeader()->getParent(); | |
| const DataLayout &DL = F->getDataLayout(); | |
| const ScalarOptions &Opts = | |
| F->getContext().getLibraryOptions().get<ScalarOptions>(); | |
| IndVarSimplify IVS(Opts, &AR.LI, &AR.SE, &AR.DT, DL, &AR.TLI, &AR.TTI, | |
| AR.MSSA, WidenIndVars && Opts.indvars_widen_indvars); | |
| if (!IVS.run(&L)) | |
| return PreservedAnalyses::all(); | |
| auto PA = getLoopPassPreservedAnalyses(); | |
| PA.preserveSet<CFGAnalyses>(); | |
| if (IVS.runUnswitching()) { | |
| AM.getResult<ShouldRunExtraSimpleLoopUnswitch>(L, AR); | |
| PA.preserve<ShouldRunExtraSimpleLoopUnswitch>(); | |
| } | |
| if (AR.MSSA) | |
| PA.preserve<MemorySSAAnalysis>(); | |
| return PA; | |
| } |