| //===-------------------------------------------------------------- C++ -*-===// | |
| // | |
| // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. | |
| // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. | |
| // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception | |
| // | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| #include "llvm/Frontend/Directive/Spelling.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Support/MathExtras.h" | |
| #include <cassert> | |
| using namespace llvm; | |
| static bool Contains(directive::VersionRange V, int P) { | |
| return V.Min <= P && P <= V.Max; | |
| } | |
| llvm::StringRef llvm::directive::FindName( | |
| llvm::iterator_range<const directive::Spelling *> Range, unsigned Version) { | |
| assert(llvm::isInt<8 * sizeof(int)>(Version) && "Version value out of range"); | |
| int V = Version; | |
| // Do a linear search to find the first Spelling that contains Version. | |
| // The condition "contains(S, Version)" does not partition the list of | |
| // spellings, so std::[lower|upper]_bound cannot be used. | |
| // In practice the list of spellings is expected to be very short, so | |
| // linear search seems appropriate. In general, an interval tree may be | |
| // a better choice, but in this case it may be an overkill. | |
| for (auto &S : Range) { | |
| if (Contains(S.Versions, V)) | |
| return S.Name; | |
| } | |
| return StringRef(); | |
| } |