| // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c89 -verify %s |
| // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c99 -verify %s |
| // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c11 -verify %s |
| // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c17 -verify %s |
| // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c23 -verify %s |
| |
| // expected-no-diagnostics |
| |
| /* WG14 ???: yes |
| * new block scopes for selection and iteration statements |
| * |
| * This is referenced in the C99 front matter as new changes to C99, but it is |
| * not clear which document number introduced the changes. It's possible this |
| * is WG14 N759, based on discussion in the C99 rationale document that claims |
| * these changes were made in response to surprising issues with the lifetime |
| * of compound literals in compound statements vs non-compound statements. |
| */ |
| |
| enum {a, b}; |
| void different(void) { |
| if (sizeof(enum {b, a}) != sizeof(int)) { |
| _Static_assert(a == 1, ""); |
| } |
| /* In C89, the 'b' found here would have been from the enum declaration in |
| * the controlling expression of the selection statement, not from the global |
| * declaration. In C99 and later, that enumeration is scoped to the 'if' |
| * statement and the global declaration is what's found. |
| */ |
| #if __STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L |
| _Static_assert(b == 1, ""); |
| #else |
| _Static_assert(b == 0, ""); |
| #endif |
| } |
| |