| //===- PseudoProbeInserter.cpp - Insert annotation for callsite profiling -===// | |
| // | |
| // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. | |
| // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. | |
| // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception | |
| // | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // | |
| // This file implements PseudoProbeInserter pass, which inserts pseudo probe | |
| // annotations for call instructions with a pseudo-probe-specific dwarf | |
| // discriminator. such discriminator indicates that the call instruction comes | |
| // with a pseudo probe, and the discriminator value holds information to | |
| // identify the corresponding counter. | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| #include "llvm/CodeGen/PseudoProbeInserter.h" | |
| #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineBasicBlock.h" | |
| #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionAnalysisManager.h" | |
| #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.h" | |
| #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstr.h" | |
| #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachinePassManager.h" | |
| #include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetInstrInfo.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Analysis.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Module.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/PseudoProbe.h" | |
| #include "llvm/InitializePasses.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ProfileData/SampleProf.h" | |
| #define DEBUG_TYPE "pseudo-probe-inserter" | |
| using namespace llvm; | |
| namespace { | |
| // A real instruction is a non-meta, non-pseudo instruction. Calls (including | |
| // call pseudos like tail-call returns) are also treated as real because they | |
| // expand to a branch and any preceding call probe must be preserved. | |
| static bool isCallOrRealInstruction(const MachineInstr &MI) { | |
| return MI.isCall() || (!MI.isPseudo() && !MI.isMetaInstruction()); | |
| } | |
| static uint64_t getFuncGUID(Module *M, DILocation *DL) { | |
| auto Name = DL->getSubprogramLinkageName(); | |
| // CoroSplit Pass will change the debug info with suffixes i.e. `.resume`, | |
| // `.destroy`, `.cleanup`. Strip these suffixes to make the GUID consistent | |
| // with the pseudo probe | |
| Name = FunctionSamples::getCanonicalCoroFnName(Name); | |
| return Function::getGUIDAssumingExternalLinkage(Name); | |
| } | |
| static bool insertPseudoProbesInMF(MachineFunction &MF) { | |
| if (!MF.getFunction().getParent()->getNamedMetadata( | |
| PseudoProbeDescMetadataName)) | |
| return false; | |
| const TargetInstrInfo *TII = MF.getSubtarget().getInstrInfo(); | |
| bool Changed = false; | |
| for (MachineBasicBlock &MBB : MF) { | |
| MachineInstr *FirstInstr = nullptr; | |
| for (MachineInstr &MI : MBB) { | |
| // Pseudo instructions like TCRETURNdi results in a branch instruction | |
| // and the call probe for that tail call should be preserved. | |
| if (isCallOrRealInstruction(MI)) | |
| FirstInstr = &MI; | |
| if (MI.isCall()) { | |
| if (DILocation *DL = MI.getDebugLoc()) { | |
| auto Value = DL->getDiscriminator(); | |
| if (DILocation::isPseudoProbeDiscriminator(Value)) { | |
| BuildMI(MBB, MI, DL, TII->get(TargetOpcode::PSEUDO_PROBE)) | |
| .addImm(getFuncGUID(MF.getFunction().getParent(), DL)) | |
| .addImm(PseudoProbeDwarfDiscriminator::extractProbeIndex(Value)) | |
| .addImm(PseudoProbeDwarfDiscriminator::extractProbeType(Value)) | |
| .addImm(PseudoProbeDwarfDiscriminator::extractProbeAttributes( | |
| Value)); | |
| Changed = true; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // Walk the block backwards, move PSEUDO_PROBE before the first real | |
| // instruction to fix out-of-order probes. There is a problem with probes | |
| // as the terminator of the block. During the offline counts processing, | |
| // the samples collected on the first physical instruction following a | |
| // probe will be counted towards the probe. This logically equals to | |
| // treating the instruction next to a probe as if it is from the same | |
| // block of the probe. This is accurate most of the time unless the | |
| // instruction can be reached from multiple flows, which means it actually | |
| // starts a new block. Samples collected on such probes may cause | |
| // imprecision with the counts inference algorithm. Fortunately, if | |
| // there are still other native instructions preceding the probe we can | |
| // use them as a place holder to collect samples for the probe. | |
| if (FirstInstr) { | |
| auto MII = MBB.rbegin(); | |
| while (MII != MBB.rend()) { | |
| // Skip all pseudo probes followed by a real instruction since they | |
| // are not dangling. Treat call pseudos (e.g. tail-call returns) | |
| // as real instructions to keep this consistent with the forward | |
| // scan above. | |
| if (isCallOrRealInstruction(*MII)) | |
| break; | |
| auto Cur = MII++; | |
| if (Cur->getOpcode() != TargetOpcode::PSEUDO_PROBE) | |
| continue; | |
| // Move the dangling probe before FirstInstr. | |
| auto *ProbeInstr = &*Cur; | |
| MBB.remove(ProbeInstr); | |
| MBB.insert(FirstInstr, ProbeInstr); | |
| Changed = true; | |
| } | |
| } else { | |
| // Probes not surrounded by any real instructions in the same block are | |
| // called dangling probes. Since there's no good way to pick up a sample | |
| // collection point for dangling probes at compile time, they are being | |
| // removed so that the profile correlation tool will not report any | |
| // samples collected for them and it's up to the counts inference tool | |
| // to get them a reasonable count. | |
| SmallVector<MachineInstr *, 4> ToBeRemoved; | |
| for (MachineInstr &MI : MBB) { | |
| if (MI.isPseudoProbe()) | |
| ToBeRemoved.push_back(&MI); | |
| } | |
| for (auto *MI : ToBeRemoved) | |
| MI->eraseFromParent(); | |
| Changed |= !ToBeRemoved.empty(); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return Changed; | |
| } | |
| class PseudoProbeInserterLegacy : public MachineFunctionPass { | |
| public: | |
| static char ID; | |
| PseudoProbeInserterLegacy() : MachineFunctionPass(ID) {} | |
| StringRef getPassName() const override { return "Pseudo Probe Inserter"; } | |
| void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override { | |
| AU.setPreservesAll(); | |
| MachineFunctionPass::getAnalysisUsage(AU); | |
| } | |
| bool runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) override { | |
| return insertPseudoProbesInMF(MF); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| } // namespace | |
| PreservedAnalyses | |
| PseudoProbeInserterPass::run(MachineFunction &MF, | |
| MachineFunctionAnalysisManager &MFAM) { | |
| return insertPseudoProbesInMF(MF) ? getMachineFunctionPassPreservedAnalyses() | |
| .preserveSet<CFGAnalyses>() | |
| : PreservedAnalyses::all(); | |
| } | |
| char PseudoProbeInserterLegacy::ID = 0; | |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(PseudoProbeInserterLegacy, DEBUG_TYPE, | |
| "Insert pseudo probe annotations for value profiling", | |
| false, false) | |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_END(PseudoProbeInserterLegacy, DEBUG_TYPE, | |
| "Insert pseudo probe annotations for value profiling", | |
| false, false) | |
| FunctionPass *llvm::createPseudoProbeInserterLegacyPass() { | |
| return new PseudoProbeInserterLegacy(); | |
| } |