llvm/docs/SymbolizerMarkupFormat.rst

==========================
Symbolizer Markup Format
==========================

.. contents::
   :local:

Overview
========

This document defines a text format for log messages that can be processed by a
symbolizing filter. The basic idea is that logging code emits text that contains
raw address values and so forth, without the logging code doing any real work to
convert those values to human-readable form. Instead, logging text uses the
markup format defined here to identify pieces of information that should be
converted to human-readable form after the fact. As with other markup formats,
the expectation is that most of the text will be displayed as is, while the
markup elements will be replaced with expanded text, or converted into active UI
elements, that present more details in symbolic form.

This means there is no need for symbol tables, DWARF debugging sections, or
similar information to be directly accessible at runtime. There is also no need
at runtime for any logic intended to compute human-readable presentation of
information, such as C++ symbol demangling. Instead, logging must include markup
elements that give the contextual information necessary to make sense of the raw
data, such as memory layout details.

This format identifies markup elements with a syntax that is both simple and
distinctive. It's simple enough to be matched and parsed with straightforward
code. It's distinctive enough that character sequences that look like the start
or end of a markup element should rarely if ever appear incidentally in logging
text. It's specifically intended not to require sanitizing plain text, such as
the HTML/XML requirement to replace ``<`` with ``&lt;`` and the like.

:doc:`llvm-symbolizer <CommandGuide/llvm-symbolizer>` includes a symbolizing
filter via its ``--filter-markup`` option.

Scope and assumptions
=====================

A symbolizing filter implementation will be independent both of the target
operating system and machine architecture where the logs are generated and of
the host operating system and machine architecture where the filter runs.

This format assumes that the symbolizing filter processes intact whole lines. If
long lines might be split during some stage of a logging pipeline, they must be
reassembled to restore the original line breaks before feeding lines into the
symbolizing filter. Most markup elements must appear entirely on a single line
(often with other text before and/or after the markup element). There are some
markup elements that are specified to span lines, with line breaks in the middle
of the element. Even in those cases, the filter is not expected to handle line
breaks in arbitrary places inside a markup element, but only inside certain
fields.

This format assumes that the symbolizing filter processes a coherent stream of
log lines from a single process address space context. If a logging stream
interleaves log lines from more than one process, these must be collated into
separate per-process log streams and each stream processed by a separate
instance of the symbolizing filter. Because the kernel and user processes use
disjoint address regions in most operating systems, a single user process
address space plus the kernel address space can be treated as a single address
space for symbolization purposes if desired.

Dependence on Build IDs
=======================

The symbolizer markup scheme relies on contextual information about runtime
memory address layout to make it possible to convert markup elements into useful
symbolic form. This relies on having an unmistakable identification of which
binary was loaded at each address.

An ELF Build ID is the payload of an ELF note with name ``"GNU"`` and type
``NT_GNU_BUILD_ID``, a unique byte sequence that identifies a particular binary
(executable, shared library, loadable module, or driver module). The linker
generates this automatically based on a hash that includes the complete symbol
table and debugging information, even if this is later stripped from the binary.

This specification uses the ELF Build ID as the sole means of identifying
binaries. Each binary relevant to the log must have been linked with a unique
Build ID. The symbolizing filter must have some means of mapping a Build ID back
to the original ELF binary (either the whole unstripped binary, or a stripped
binary paired with a separate debug file).

Colorization
============

The markup format supports a restricted subset of ANSI X3.64 SGR (Select Graphic
Rendition) control sequences. These are unlike other markup elements:

* They specify presentation details (bold or colors) rather than semantic
  information. The association of semantic meaning with color (e.g. red for
  errors) is chosen by the code doing the logging, rather than by the UI
  presentation of the symbolizing filter. This is a concession to existing code
  (e.g. LLVM sanitizer runtimes) that use specific colors and would require
  substantial changes to generate semantic markup instead.

* A single control sequence changes "the state", rather than being an
  hierarchical structure that surrounds affected text.

The filter processes ANSI SGR control sequences only within a single line. If a
control sequence to enter a bold or color state is encountered, it's expected
that the control sequence to reset to default state will be encountered before
the end of that line. If a "dangling" state is left at the end of a line, the
filter may reset to default state for the next line.

An SGR control sequence is not interpreted inside any other markup element.
However, other markup elements may appear between SGR control sequences and the
color/bold state is expected to apply to the symbolic output that replaces the
markup element in the filter's output.

The accepted SGR control sequences all have the form ``"\033[%um"`` (expressed here
using C string syntax), where ``%u`` is one of these:

==== ============================ ===============================================
Code Effect                       Notes
==== ============================ ===============================================
0    Reset to default formatting.
1    Bold text                    Combines with color states, doesn't reset them.
30   Black foreground
31   Red foreground
32   Green foreground
33   Yellow foreground
34   Blue foreground
35   Magenta foreground
36   Cyan foreground
37   White foreground
==== ============================ ===============================================

Common markup element syntax
============================

All the markup elements share a common syntactic structure to facilitate simple
matching and parsing code. Each element has the form::

  {{{tag:fields}}}

``tag`` identifies one of the element types described below, and is always a
short alphabetic string that must be in lower case. The rest of the element
consists of one or more fields. Fields are separated by ``:`` and cannot contain
any ``:`` or ``}`` characters. How many fields must be or may be present and
what they contain is specified for each element type.

No markup elements or ANSI SGR control sequences are interpreted inside the
contents of a field.

In the descriptions of each element type, ``printf``-style placeholders indicate
field contents:

``%s``
  A string of printable characters, not including ``:`` or ``}``.

``%p``
  An address value represented by ``0x`` followed by an even number of
  hexadecimal digits (using either lower-case or upper-case for ``A``–``F``).
  If the digits are all ``0`` then the ``0x`` prefix may be omitted. No more
  than 16 hexadecimal digits are expected to appear in a single value (64 bits).

``%u``
  A nonnegative decimal integer.

``%i``
  A nonnegative integer. The digits are hexadecimal if prefixed by ``0x``, octal
  if prefixed by ``0``, or decimal otherwise.

``%x``
  A sequence of an even number of hexadecimal digits (using either lower-case or
  upper-case for ``A``–``F``), with no ``0x`` prefix. This represents an
  arbitrary sequence of bytes, such as an ELF Build ID.

Presentation elements
=====================

These are elements that convey a specific program entity to be displayed in
human-readable symbolic form.

``{{{symbol:%s}}}``
  Here ``%s`` is the linkage name for a symbol or type. It may require
  demangling according to language ABI rules. Even for unmangled names, it's
  recommended that this markup element be used to identify a symbol name so that
  it can be presented distinctively.

  Examples::

    {{{symbol:_ZN7Mangled4NameEv}}}
    {{{symbol:foobar}}}

``{{{pc:%p}}}``, ``{{{pc:%p:ra}}}``, ``{{{pc:%p:pc}}}``

  Here ``%p`` is the memory address of a code location. It might be presented as a
  function name and source location. The second two forms distinguish the kind of
  code location, as described in detail for bt elements below.

  Examples::

    {{{pc:0x12345678}}}
    {{{pc:0xffffffff9abcdef0}}}

``{{{data:%p}}}``

  Here ``%p`` is the memory address of a data location. It might be presented as
  the name of a global variable at that location.

  Examples::

    {{{data:0x12345678}}}
    {{{data:0xffffffff9abcdef0}}}

``{{{bt:%u:%p}}}``, ``{{{bt:%u:%p:ra}}}``, ``{{{bt:%u:%p:pc}}}``

  This represents one frame in a backtrace. It usually appears on a line by
  itself (surrounded only by whitespace), in a sequence of such lines with
  ascending frame numbers. So the human-readable output might be formatted
  assuming that, such that it looks good for a sequence of bt elements each
  alone on its line with uniform indentation of each line. But it can appear
  anywhere, so the filter should not remove any non-whitespace text surrounding
  the element.

  Here ``%u`` is the frame number, which starts at zero for the location of the
  fault being identified, increments to one for the caller of frame zero's call
  frame, to two for the caller of frame one, etc. ``%p`` is the memory address
  of a code location.

  Code locations in a backtrace come from two distinct sources. Most backtrace
  frames describe a return address code location, i.e. the instruction
  immediately after a call instruction. This is the location of code that has
  yet to run, since the function called there has not yet returned. Hence the
  code location of actual interest is usually the call site itself rather than
  the return address, i.e. one instruction earlier. When presenting the source
  location for a return address frame, the symbolizing filter will subtract one
  byte or one instruction length from the actual return address for the call
  site, with the intent that the address logged can be translated directly to a
  source location for the call site and not for the apparent return site
  thereafter (which can be confusing).  When inlined functions are involved, the
  call site and the return site can appear to be in different functions at
  entirely unrelated source locations rather than just a line away, making the
  confusion of showing the return site rather the call site quite severe.

  Often the first frame in a backtrace ("frame zero") identifies the precise
  code location of a fault, trap, or asynchronous interrupt rather than a return
  address. At other times, even the first frame is actually a return address
  (for example, backtraces collected at the time of an object allocation and
  reported later when the allocated object is used or misused). When a system
  supports in-thread trap handling, there may also be frames after the first
  that represent a precise interrupted code location rather than a return
  address, presented as the "caller" of a trap handler function (for example,
  signal handlers in POSIX systems).

  Return address frames are identified by the ``:ra`` suffix. Precise code
  location frames are identified by the ``:pc`` suffix.

  Traditional practice has often been to collect backtraces as simple address
  lists, losing the distinction between return address code locations and
  precise code locations. Some such code applies the "subtract one" adjustment
  described above to the address values before reporting them, and it's not
  always clear or consistent whether this adjustment has been applied or not.
  These ambiguous cases are supported by the ``bt`` and ``pc`` forms with no
  ``:ra`` or ``:pc`` suffix, which indicate it's unclear which sort of code
  location this is.  However, it's highly recommended that all emitters use the
  suffixed forms and deliver address values with no adjustments applied. When
  traditional practice has been ambiguous, the majority of cases seem to have
  been of printing addresses that are return address code locations and printing
  them without adjustment. So the symbolizing filter will usually apply the
  "subtract one byte" adjustment to an address printed without a disambiguating
  suffix. Assuming that a call instruction is longer than one byte on all
  supported machines, applying the "subtract one byte" adjustment a second time
  still results in an address somewhere in the call instruction, so a little
  sloppiness here often does little or no harm.

  Examples::

    {{{bt:0:0x12345678:pc}}}
    {{{bt:1:0xffffffff9abcdef0:ra}}}

``{{{hexdict:...}}}`` [#not_yet_implemented]_

  This element can span multiple lines. Here ``...`` is a sequence of key-value
  pairs where a single ``:`` separates each key from its value, and arbitrary
  whitespace separates the pairs. The value (right-hand side) of each pair
  either is one or more ``0`` digits, or is ``0x`` followed by hexadecimal
  digits. Each value might be a memory address or might be some other integer
  (including an integer that looks like a likely memory address but actually has
  an unrelated purpose). When the contextual information about the memory layout
  suggests that a given value could be a code location or a global variable data
  address, it might be presented as a source location or variable name or with
  active UI that makes such interpretation optionally visible.

  The intended use is for things like register dumps, where the emitter doesn't
  know which values might have a symbolic interpretation but a presentation that
  makes plausible symbolic interpretations available might be very useful to
  someone reading the log. At the same time, a flat text presentation should
  usually avoid interfering too much with the original contents and formatting
  of the dump. For example, it might use footnotes with source locations for
  values that appear to be code locations. An active UI presentation might show
  the dump text as is, but highlight values with symbolic information available
  and pop up a presentation of symbolic details when a value is selected.

  Example::

    {{{hexdict:
        CS:                   0 RIP:     0x6ee17076fb80 EFL:            0x10246 CR2:                  0
        RAX:      0xc53d0acbcf0 RBX:     0x1e659ea7e0d0 RCX:                  0 RDX:     0x6ee1708300cc
        RSI:                  0 RDI:     0x6ee170830040 RBP:     0x3b13734898e0 RSP:     0x3b13734898d8
        R8:      0x3b1373489860 R9:          0x2776ff4f R10:     0x2749d3e9a940 R11:              0x246
        R12:     0x1e659ea7e0f0 R13: 0xd7231230fd6ff2e7 R14:     0x1e659ea7e108 R15:      0xc53d0acbcf0
      }}}

Trigger elements
================

These elements cause an external action and will be presented to the user in a
human readable form. Generally they trigger an external action to occur that
results in a linkable page. The link or some other informative information about
the external action can then be presented to the user.

``{{{dumpfile:%s:%s}}}`` [#not_yet_implemented]_

  Here the first ``%s`` is an identifier for a type of dump and the second
  ``%s`` is an identifier for a particular dump that's just been published. The
  types of dumps, the exact meaning of "published", and the nature of the
  identifier are outside the scope of the markup format per se. In general it
  might correspond to writing a file by that name or something similar.

  This element may trigger additional post-processing work beyond symbolizing
  the markup. It indicates that a dump file of some sort has been published.
  Some logic attached to the symbolizing filter may understand certain types of
  dump file and trigger additional post-processing of the dump file upon
  encountering this element (e.g. generating visualizations, symbolization). The
  expectation is that the information collected from contextual elements
  (described below) in the logging stream may be necessary to decode the content
  of the dump. So if the symbolizing filter triggers other processing, it may
  need to feed some distilled form of the contextual information to those
  processes.

  An example of a type identifier is ``sancov``, for dumps from LLVM
  `SanitizerCoverage <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/SanitizerCoverage.html>`_.

  Example::

    {{{dumpfile:sancov:sancov.8675}}}

Contextual elements
===================

These are elements that supply information necessary to convert presentation
elements to symbolic form. Unlike presentation elements, they are not directly
related to the surrounding text. Contextual elements should appear alone on
lines with no other non-whitespace text, so that the symbolizing filter might
elide the whole line from its output without hiding any other log text.

The contextual elements themselves do not necessarily need to be presented in
human-readable output. However, the information they impart may be essential to
understanding the logging text even after symbolization. So it's recommended
that this information be preserved in some form when the original raw log with
markup may no longer be readily accessible for whatever reason.

Contextual elements should appear in the logging stream before they are needed.
That is, if some piece of context may affect how the symbolizing filter would
interpret or present a later presentation element, the necessary contextual
elements should have appeared somewhere earlier in the logging stream. It should
always be possible for the symbolizing filter to be implemented as a single pass
over the raw logging stream, accumulating context and massaging text as it goes.

``{{{reset}}}``

  This should be output before any other contextual element. The need for this
  contextual element is to support implementations that handle logs coming from
  multiple processes. Such implementations might not know when a new process
  starts or ends. Because some identifying information (like process IDs) might
  be the same between old and new processes, a way is needed to distinguish two
  processes with such identical identifying information. This element informs
  such implementations to reset the state of a filter so that information from a
  previous process's contextual elements is not assumed for new process that
  just happens have the same identifying information.

``{{{module:%i:%s:%s:...}}}``

  This element represents a so-called "module". A "module" is a single linked
  binary, such as a loaded ELF file. Usually each module occupies a contiguous
  range of memory.

  Here ``%i`` is the module ID which is used by other contextual elements to
  refer to this module. The first ``%s`` is a human-readable identifier for the
  module, such as an ELF ``DT_SONAME`` string or a file name; but it might be
  empty. It's only for casual information. Only the module ID is used to refer
  to this module in other contextual elements, never the ``%s`` string. The
  ``module`` element defining a module ID must always be emitted before any
  other elements that refer to that module ID, so that a filter never needs to
  keep track of dangling references. The second ``%s`` is the module type and it
  determines what the remaining fields are. The following module types are
  supported:

  * ``elf:%x``

  Here ``%x`` encodes an ELF Build ID. The Build ID should refer to a single
  linked binary. The Build ID string is the sole way to identify the binary from
  which this module was loaded.

  Example::

    {{{module:1:libc.so:elf:83238ab56ba10497}}}

``{{{mmap:%p:%i:...}}}``

  This contextual element is used to give information about a particular region
  in memory. ``%p`` is the starting address and ``%i`` gives the size in hex of the
  region of memory. The ``...`` part can take different forms to give different
  information about the specified region of memory. The allowed forms are the
  following:

  * ``load:%i:%s:%p``

  This subelement informs the filter that a segment was loaded from a module.
  The module is identified by its module ID ``%i``. The ``%s`` is one or more of
  the letters 'r', 'w', and 'x' (in that order and in either upper or lower
  case) to indicate this segment of memory is readable, writable, and/or
  executable. The symbolizing filter can use this information to guess whether
  an address is a likely code address or a likely data address in the given
  module. The remaining ``%p`` gives the module relative address. For ELF files
  the module relative address will be the ``p_vaddr`` of the associated program
  header. For example if your module's executable segment has
  ``p_vaddr=0x1000``, ``p_memsz=0x1234``, and was loaded at ``0x7acba69d5000``
  then you need to subtract ``0x7acba69d4000`` from any address between
  ``0x7acba69d5000`` and ``0x7acba69d6234`` to get the module relative address.
  The starting address will usually have been rounded down to the active page
  size, and the size rounded up.

  Example::

    {{{mmap:0x7acba69d5000:0x5a000:load:1:rx:0x1000}}}

.. rubric:: Footnotes

.. [#not_yet_implemented] This markup element is not yet implemented in
  :doc:`llvm-symbolizer <CommandGuide/llvm-symbolizer>`.