blob: 8dc18565405c08e3ab957407695719c8a34e9a6e [file] [log] [blame]
.. _ContributingToLibcxx:
======================
Contributing to libc++
======================
This file contains notes about various tasks and processes specific to contributing
to libc++. If this is your first time contributing, please also read `this document
<https://www.llvm.org/docs/Contributing.html>`__ on general rules for contributing to LLVM.
For libc++, please make sure you follow `these instructions <https://www.llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html#requesting-a-review-via-the-command-line>`_
for submitting a code review from the command-line using ``arc``, since we have some
automation (e.g. CI) that depends on the review being submitted that way.
If you plan on contributing to libc++, it can be useful to join the ``#libcxx`` channel
on `LLVM's Discord server <https://discord.gg/jzUbyP26tQ>`__.
Looking for pre-existing reviews
================================
Before you start working on any feature, please take a look at the open reviews
to avoid duplicating someone else's work. You can do that by going to the website
where code reviews are held, `Differential <https://reviews.llvm.org/differential>`__,
and clicking on ``Libc++ Open Reviews`` in the sidebar to the left. If you see
that your feature is already being worked on, please consider chiming in instead
of duplicating work!
Pre-commit check list
=====================
Before committing or creating a review, please go through this check-list to make
sure you don't forget anything:
- Do you have tests for every public class and/or function you're adding or modifying?
- Did you update the synopsis of the relevant headers?
- Did you update the relevant files to track implementation status (in ``docs/Status/``)?
- Did you mark all functions and type declarations with the :ref:`proper visibility macro <visibility-macros>`?
- If you added a header:
- Did you add it to ``include/module.modulemap``?
- Did you add it to ``include/CMakeLists.txt``?
- If it's a public header, did you add a test under ``test/libcxx`` that the new header defines ``_LIBCPP_VERSION``? See ``test/libcxx/algorithms/version.pass.cpp`` for an example. NOTE: This should be automated.
- If it's a public header, did you update ``utils/generate_header_inclusion_tests.py``?
- Did you add the relevant feature test macro(s) for your feature? Did you update the ``generate_feature_test_macro_components.py`` script with it?
- Did you run the ``libcxx-generate-files`` target and verify its output?
Post-release check list
=======================
After branching for an LLVM release:
1. Update ``_LIBCPP_VERSION`` in ``include/__config``
2. Update the ``include/__libcpp_version`` file
3. Update the version number in ``docs/conf.py``
Exporting new symbols from the library
======================================
When exporting new symbols from libc++, you must update the ABI lists located in ``lib/abi``.
To test whether the lists are up-to-date, please run the target ``check-cxx-abilist``.
To regenerate the lists, use the target ``generate-cxx-abilist``.
The ABI lists must be updated for all supported platforms; currently Linux and
Apple. If you don't have access to one of these platforms, you can download an
updated list from the failed build at
`Buildkite <https://buildkite.com/llvm-project/libcxx-ci>`__.
Look for the failed build and select the ``artifacts`` tab. There, download the
abilist for the platform, e.g.:
* C++20 for the Linux platform.
* MacOS C++20 for the Apple platform.
Working on large features
=========================
Libc++ makes no guarantees about the implementation status or the ABI stability
of features that have not yet been ratified in the C++ Standard. After the C++
Standard is ratified libc++ promises a conforming and ABI-stable
implementation. When working on a large new feature in the ratified version of
the C++ Standard that can't be finished before the next release branch is
created, we can't honor this promise. Another reason for not being able to
promise ABI stability happens when the C++ Standard committee retroactively
accepts ABI breaking papers as defect reports against the ratified C++
Standard.
When working on these features it should be possible for libc++ vendors to
disable these incomplete features, so they can promise ABI stability to their
customers. This is done by the CMake option
``LIBCXX_ENABLE_INCOMPLETE_FEATURES``. When start working on a large feature
the following steps are required to guard the new library with the CMake
option.
* ``libcxx/CMakeLists.txt``: Add
.. code-block:: cmake
config_define_if_not(LIBCXX_ENABLE_INCOMPLETE_FEATURES _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_FOO)
* ``libcxx/include/__config_site.in``: Add
.. code-block:: c++
#cmakedefine _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_FOO
* ``libcxx/include/foo``: The contents of the file should be guarded in an
``ifdef`` and always include ``<version>``
.. code-block:: c++
#ifndef _LIBCPP_FOO
#define _LIBCPP_FOO
// Make sure all feature-test macros are available.
#include <version>
// Enable the contents of the header only when libc++ was built with LIBCXX_ENABLE_INCOMPLETE_FEATURES.
#if !defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_FOO)
...
#endif // !defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_FO0)
#endif // _LIBCPP_FOO
* ``libcxx/src/CMakeLists.txt``: When the library has a file ``foo.cpp`` it
should only be added when ``LIBCXX_ENABLE_INCOMPLETE_FEATURES`` is enabled
.. code-block:: cmake
if(LIBCXX_ENABLE_INCOMPLETE_FEATURES)
list(APPEND LIBCXX_SOURCES
foo.cpp
)
endif()
* ``libcxx/utils/generate_feature_test_macro_components.py``: Add to
``lit_markup``
.. code-block:: python
"foo": ["UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-has-no-incomplete-foo"],
* ``libcxx/utils/generate_header_inclusion_tests.py``: Add to ``lit_markup``
.. code-block:: python
"foo": ["UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-has-no-incomplete-foo"],
* ``libcxx/utils/generate_header_tests.py``: Add to ``header_markup``
.. code-block:: python
"foo": ["ifndef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_FOO"],
* ``libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/features.py``: Add to ``macros``
.. code-block:: python
'_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_FOO': 'libcpp-has-no-incomplete-foo',
* All tests that include ``<foo>`` should contain
.. code-block:: c++
// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-has-no-incomplete-foo
Once the library is complete these changes and guards should be removed.