| //===-- VPlanVerifier.cpp -------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // | |
| // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. | |
| // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. | |
| // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception | |
| // | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| /// | |
| /// \file | |
| /// This file defines the class VPlanVerifier, which contains utility functions | |
| /// to check the consistency and invariants of a VPlan. | |
| /// | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| #include "VPlanVerifier.h" | |
| #include "VPlan.h" | |
| #include "VPlanCFG.h" | |
| #include "VPlanDominatorTree.h" | |
| #include "VPlanHelpers.h" | |
| #include "VPlanPatternMatch.h" | |
| #include "VPlanUtils.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/TypeSwitch.h" | |
| #define DEBUG_TYPE "loop-vectorize" | |
| using namespace llvm; | |
| using namespace VPlanPatternMatch; | |
| namespace { | |
| class VPlanVerifier { | |
| const VPDominatorTree &VPDT; | |
| VPTypeAnalysis &TypeInfo; | |
| SmallPtrSet<BasicBlock *, 8> WrappedIRBBs; | |
| // Verify that phi-like recipes are at the beginning of \p VPBB, with no | |
| // other recipes in between. Also check that only header blocks contain | |
| // VPHeaderPHIRecipes. | |
| bool verifyPhiRecipes(const VPBasicBlock *VPBB); | |
| /// Verify that \p LastActiveLane's operand is guaranteed to be a prefix-mask. | |
| bool verifyLastActiveLaneRecipe(const VPInstruction &LastActiveLane) const; | |
| bool verifyVPBasicBlock(const VPBasicBlock *VPBB); | |
| bool verifyBlock(const VPBlockBase *VPB); | |
| /// Helper function that verifies the CFG invariants of the VPBlockBases | |
| /// within | |
| /// \p Region. Checks in this function are generic for VPBlockBases. They are | |
| /// not specific for VPBasicBlocks or VPRegionBlocks. | |
| bool verifyBlocksInRegion(const VPRegionBlock *Region); | |
| /// Verify the CFG invariants of VPRegionBlock \p Region and its nested | |
| /// VPBlockBases. Do not recurse inside nested VPRegionBlocks. | |
| bool verifyRegion(const VPRegionBlock *Region); | |
| /// Verify the CFG invariants of VPRegionBlock \p Region and its nested | |
| /// VPBlockBases. Recurse inside nested VPRegionBlocks. | |
| bool verifyRegionRec(const VPRegionBlock *Region); | |
| public: | |
| VPlanVerifier(VPDominatorTree &VPDT, VPTypeAnalysis &TypeInfo) | |
| : VPDT(VPDT), TypeInfo(TypeInfo) {} | |
| bool verify(const VPlan &Plan); | |
| }; | |
| } // namespace | |
| bool VPlanVerifier::verifyPhiRecipes(const VPBasicBlock *VPBB) { | |
| auto RecipeI = VPBB->begin(); | |
| auto End = VPBB->end(); | |
| unsigned NumActiveLaneMaskPhiRecipes = 0; | |
| bool IsHeaderVPBB = VPBlockUtils::isHeader(VPBB, VPDT); | |
| while (RecipeI != End && RecipeI->isPhi()) { | |
| if (isa<VPActiveLaneMaskPHIRecipe>(RecipeI)) | |
| NumActiveLaneMaskPhiRecipes++; | |
| if (IsHeaderVPBB && | |
| !isa<VPHeaderPHIRecipe, VPWidenPHIRecipe, VPPhi>(*RecipeI)) { | |
| errs() << "Found non-header PHI recipe in header VPBB"; | |
| #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) | |
| errs() << ": "; | |
| RecipeI->dump(); | |
| #endif | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| if (!IsHeaderVPBB && isa<VPHeaderPHIRecipe>(*RecipeI)) { | |
| errs() << "Found header PHI recipe in non-header VPBB"; | |
| #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) | |
| errs() << ": "; | |
| RecipeI->dump(); | |
| #endif | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| if (isa<VPCurrentIterationPHIRecipe>(RecipeI) && | |
| RecipeI->getIterator() != VPBB->begin()) { | |
| errs() << "CurrentIteration PHI is not the first recipe\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| // Check if the recipe operands match the number of predecessors. | |
| // TODO Extend to other phi-like recipes. | |
| if (auto *PhiIRI = dyn_cast<VPIRPhi>(&*RecipeI)) { | |
| if (PhiIRI->getNumOperands() != VPBB->getNumPredecessors()) { | |
| errs() << "Phi-like recipe with different number of operands and " | |
| "predecessors.\n"; | |
| // TODO: Print broken recipe. At the moment printing an ill-formed | |
| // phi-like recipe may crash. | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| RecipeI++; | |
| } | |
| if (!VPBB->getPlan()->isUnrolled() && NumActiveLaneMaskPhiRecipes > 1) { | |
| errs() << "There should be no more than one VPActiveLaneMaskPHIRecipe"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| while (RecipeI != End) { | |
| if (RecipeI->isPhi() && !isa<VPBlendRecipe>(&*RecipeI)) { | |
| errs() << "Found phi-like recipe after non-phi recipe"; | |
| #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) | |
| errs() << ": "; | |
| RecipeI->dump(); | |
| errs() << "after\n"; | |
| std::prev(RecipeI)->dump(); | |
| #endif | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| RecipeI++; | |
| } | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| static bool isKnownMonotonic(VPValue *V) { | |
| VPValue *X, *Y; | |
| if (match(V, m_Add(m_VPValue(X), m_VPValue(Y)))) | |
| return cast<VPRecipeWithIRFlags>(V)->hasNoUnsignedWrap() && | |
| isKnownMonotonic(X) && isKnownMonotonic(Y); | |
| if (match(V, m_StepVector())) | |
| return true; | |
| // Only handle a subset of IVs until we can guarantee there's no overflow. | |
| if (auto *WidenIV = dyn_cast<VPWidenIntOrFpInductionRecipe>(V)) | |
| return WidenIV->isCanonical() || WidenIV->hasNoUnsignedWrap(); | |
| if (auto *Steps = dyn_cast<VPScalarIVStepsRecipe>(V)) | |
| return match(Steps->getOperand(0), | |
| m_CombineOr( | |
| m_CanonicalIV(), | |
| m_DerivedIV(m_ZeroInt(), m_CanonicalIV(), m_One()))) && | |
| match(Steps->getStepValue(), m_One()); | |
| if (isa<VPWidenCanonicalIVRecipe>(V)) | |
| return true; | |
| return vputils::isUniformAcrossVFsAndUFs(V); | |
| } | |
| bool VPlanVerifier::verifyLastActiveLaneRecipe( | |
| const VPInstruction &LastActiveLane) const { | |
| assert(LastActiveLane.getOpcode() == VPInstruction::LastActiveLane && | |
| "must be called with VPInstruction::LastActiveLane"); | |
| if (LastActiveLane.getNumOperands() < 1) { | |
| errs() << "LastActiveLane must have at least one operand\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| const VPlan &Plan = *LastActiveLane.getParent()->getPlan(); | |
| // All operands must be prefix-mask. This means an icmp ult/ule LHS, RHS where | |
| // the LHS is monotonically increasing and RHS is uniform across VFs and UF. | |
| for (VPValue *Op : LastActiveLane.operands()) { | |
| if (vputils::isHeaderMask(Op, Plan)) | |
| continue; | |
| CmpPredicate Pred; | |
| VPValue *LHS, *RHS; | |
| if (match(Op, m_ICmp(Pred, m_VPValue(LHS), m_VPValue(RHS))) && | |
| (Pred == CmpInst::ICMP_ULE || Pred == CmpInst::ICMP_ULT) && | |
| isKnownMonotonic(LHS) && | |
| (vputils::isUniformAcrossVFsAndUFs(RHS) || | |
| match(RHS, m_EVL(m_VPValue())))) | |
| continue; | |
| errs() << "LastActiveLane operand "; | |
| #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) | |
| VPSlotTracker Tracker(&Plan); | |
| Op->printAsOperand(errs(), Tracker); | |
| #endif | |
| errs() << " must be prefix mask (a header mask or an " | |
| "EVL-derived mask currently)\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| bool VPlanVerifier::verifyVPBasicBlock(const VPBasicBlock *VPBB) { | |
| if (!verifyPhiRecipes(VPBB)) | |
| return false; | |
| // Verify that defs in VPBB dominate all their uses. | |
| DenseMap<const VPRecipeBase *, unsigned> RecipeNumbering; | |
| unsigned Cnt = 0; | |
| for (const VPRecipeBase &R : *VPBB) | |
| RecipeNumbering[&R] = Cnt++; | |
| for (const VPRecipeBase &R : *VPBB) { | |
| if (isa<VPIRInstruction>(&R) && !isa<VPIRBasicBlock>(VPBB)) { | |
| errs() << "VPIRInstructions "; | |
| #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) | |
| R.dump(); | |
| errs() << " "; | |
| #endif | |
| errs() << "not in a VPIRBasicBlock!\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| for (const VPValue *V : R.definedValues()) { | |
| // Verify that we can infer a scalar type for each defined value. With | |
| // assertions enabled, inferScalarType will perform some consistency | |
| // checks during type inference. | |
| if (!TypeInfo.inferScalarType(V)) { | |
| errs() << "Failed to infer scalar type!\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| // MaskedCond may be used from blocks it don't dominate; the block will be | |
| // linearized and it will dominate its users after linearization. | |
| if (match(&R, m_VPInstruction<VPInstruction::MaskedCond>())) | |
| continue; | |
| for (const VPUser *U : V->users()) { | |
| auto *UI = cast<VPRecipeBase>(U); | |
| if (isa<VPIRPhi>(UI) && | |
| UI->getNumOperands() != UI->getParent()->getNumPredecessors()) { | |
| errs() << "Phi-like recipe with different number of operands and " | |
| "predecessors.\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| if (auto *Phi = dyn_cast<VPPhiAccessors>(UI)) { | |
| for (const auto &[IncomingVPV, IncomingVPBB] : | |
| Phi->incoming_values_and_blocks()) { | |
| if (IncomingVPV != V) | |
| continue; | |
| if (VPDT.dominates(VPBB, IncomingVPBB)) | |
| continue; | |
| errs() << "Incoming def does not dominate incoming block!\n"; | |
| #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) | |
| VPSlotTracker Tracker(VPBB->getPlan()); | |
| IncomingVPV->getDefiningRecipe()->print(errs(), " ", Tracker); | |
| errs() << "\n does not dominate " << IncomingVPBB->getName() | |
| << " for\n"; | |
| UI->print(errs(), " ", Tracker); | |
| #endif | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| // TODO: Also verify VPPredInstPHIRecipe. | |
| if (isa<VPPredInstPHIRecipe>(UI)) | |
| continue; | |
| // If the user is in the same block, check it comes after R in the | |
| // block. | |
| if (UI->getParent() == VPBB) { | |
| if (RecipeNumbering[UI] >= RecipeNumbering[&R]) | |
| continue; | |
| } else { | |
| if (VPDT.dominates(VPBB, UI->getParent())) | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| // Recipes in blocks with a MaskedCond may be used in exit blocks; the | |
| // block will be linearized and its recipes will dominate their users | |
| // after linearization. | |
| bool BlockHasMaskedCond = any_of(*VPBB, [](const VPRecipeBase &R) { | |
| return match(&R, m_VPInstruction<VPInstruction::MaskedCond>()); | |
| }); | |
| if (BlockHasMaskedCond && | |
| any_of(VPBB->getPlan()->getExitBlocks(), [UI](VPIRBasicBlock *EB) { | |
| return is_contained(EB->getPredecessors(), UI->getParent()); | |
| })) { | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| errs() << "Use before def!\n"; | |
| #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) | |
| VPSlotTracker Tracker(VPBB->getPlan()); | |
| UI->print(errs(), " ", Tracker); | |
| errs() << "\n before\n"; | |
| R.print(errs(), " ", Tracker); | |
| errs() << "\n"; | |
| #endif | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| if (const auto *VPI = dyn_cast<VPInstruction>(&R)) { | |
| switch (VPI->getOpcode()) { | |
| case VPInstruction::LastActiveLane: | |
| if (!verifyLastActiveLaneRecipe(*VPI)) | |
| return false; | |
| break; | |
| default: | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| if (const auto *ScalarIVSteps = dyn_cast<VPScalarIVStepsRecipe>(&R)) { | |
| unsigned NumOps = ScalarIVSteps->getNumOperands(); | |
| if (NumOps != 3 && NumOps != 4) { | |
| errs() << "VPScalarIVStepsRecipe must have 3 or 4 operands\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| auto *IRBB = dyn_cast<VPIRBasicBlock>(VPBB); | |
| if (!IRBB) | |
| return true; | |
| if (!WrappedIRBBs.insert(IRBB->getIRBasicBlock()).second) { | |
| errs() << "Same IR basic block used by multiple wrapper blocks!\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| bool VPlanVerifier::verifyBlock(const VPBlockBase *VPB) { | |
| auto *VPBB = dyn_cast<VPBasicBlock>(VPB); | |
| // Check block's condition bit. | |
| if (VPBB && !isa<VPIRBasicBlock>(VPB)) { | |
| // For plain CFG VPlans, verify header and latch block structure. | |
| if (!VPBB->getParent()) { | |
| if (VPBlockUtils::isHeader(VPBB, VPDT)) { | |
| if (VPB->getNumPredecessors() != 2) { | |
| errs() | |
| << "Header block in plain CFG VPlan must have 2 predecessors!\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| // Predecessor 0 is preheader, predecessor 1 is latch. | |
| if (!VPBlockUtils::isLatch(VPB->getPredecessors()[1], VPDT)) { | |
| errs() << "Header's second predecessor must be the latch!\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| if (VPBlockUtils::isLatch(VPBB, VPDT)) { | |
| auto BranchTerminator = | |
| m_CombineOr(m_BranchOnCond(), | |
| m_CombineOr(m_BranchOnCount(), m_BranchOnTwoConds())); | |
| if (!match(VPBB->getTerminator(), BranchTerminator)) { | |
| errs() << "Latch block must have a branch terminator!\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| // Successor 0 is middle block, successor 1 is header. | |
| if (VPBlockUtils::isHeader(VPB->getSuccessors()[0], VPDT)) { | |
| errs() << "Latch's first successor must not be the header (must be " | |
| "middle block)!\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } else if (VPB->getNumSuccessors() > 1 || | |
| (VPBB->isExiting() && !VPBB->getParent()->isReplicator())) { | |
| if (!VPBB->getTerminator()) { | |
| errs() << "Block has multiple successors but doesn't " | |
| "have a proper branch recipe!\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| } else if (VPBB->getTerminator()) { | |
| errs() << "Unexpected branch recipe!\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // Check block's successors. | |
| const auto &Successors = VPB->getSuccessors(); | |
| for (const VPBlockBase *Succ : Successors) { | |
| // There must be a bi-directional link between block and successor. | |
| const auto &SuccPreds = Succ->getPredecessors(); | |
| if (!is_contained(SuccPreds, VPB)) { | |
| errs() << "Missing predecessor link.\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // Check block's predecessors. | |
| const auto &Predecessors = VPB->getPredecessors(); | |
| for (const VPBlockBase *Pred : Predecessors) { | |
| // Block and predecessor must be inside the same region. | |
| if (Pred->getParent() != VPB->getParent()) { | |
| errs() << "Predecessor is not in the same region.\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| // There must be a bi-directional link between block and predecessor. | |
| const auto &PredSuccs = Pred->getSuccessors(); | |
| if (!is_contained(PredSuccs, VPB)) { | |
| errs() << "Missing successor link.\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return !VPBB || verifyVPBasicBlock(VPBB); | |
| } | |
| bool VPlanVerifier::verifyBlocksInRegion(const VPRegionBlock *Region) { | |
| for (const VPBlockBase *VPB : vp_depth_first_shallow(Region->getEntry())) { | |
| // Check block's parent. | |
| if (VPB->getParent() != Region) { | |
| errs() << "VPBlockBase has wrong parent\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| if (!verifyBlock(VPB)) | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| bool VPlanVerifier::verifyRegion(const VPRegionBlock *Region) { | |
| const VPBlockBase *Entry = Region->getEntry(); | |
| const VPBlockBase *Exiting = Region->getExiting(); | |
| // Entry and Exiting shouldn't have any predecessor/successor, respectively. | |
| if (Entry->hasPredecessors()) { | |
| errs() << "region entry block has predecessors\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| if (Exiting->getNumSuccessors() != 0) { | |
| errs() << "region exiting block has successors\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| return verifyBlocksInRegion(Region); | |
| } | |
| bool VPlanVerifier::verifyRegionRec(const VPRegionBlock *Region) { | |
| // Recurse inside nested regions and check all blocks inside the region. | |
| return verifyRegion(Region) && | |
| all_of(vp_depth_first_shallow(Region->getEntry()), | |
| [this](const VPBlockBase *VPB) { | |
| const auto *SubRegion = dyn_cast<VPRegionBlock>(VPB); | |
| return !SubRegion || verifyRegionRec(SubRegion); | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| bool VPlanVerifier::verify(const VPlan &Plan) { | |
| if (any_of(vp_depth_first_shallow(Plan.getEntry()), | |
| [this](const VPBlockBase *VPB) { return !verifyBlock(VPB); })) | |
| return false; | |
| const VPRegionBlock *TopRegion = Plan.getVectorLoopRegion(); | |
| // TODO: Verify all blocks using vp_depth_first_deep iterators. | |
| if (!TopRegion) | |
| return true; | |
| if (!verifyRegionRec(TopRegion)) | |
| return false; | |
| if (TopRegion->getParent()) { | |
| errs() << "VPlan Top Region should have no parent.\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| const VPBasicBlock *Entry = dyn_cast<VPBasicBlock>(TopRegion->getEntry()); | |
| if (!Entry) { | |
| errs() << "VPlan entry block is not a VPBasicBlock\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| const VPBasicBlock *Exiting = dyn_cast<VPBasicBlock>(TopRegion->getExiting()); | |
| if (!Exiting) { | |
| errs() << "VPlan exiting block is not a VPBasicBlock\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| if (Exiting->empty()) { | |
| errs() << "VPlan vector loop exiting block must end with BranchOnCount, " | |
| "BranchOnCond, or BranchOnTwoConds VPInstruction but is empty\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| auto *LastInst = dyn_cast<VPInstruction>(std::prev(Exiting->end())); | |
| if (!match(LastInst, m_CombineOr(m_BranchOnCond(), | |
| m_CombineOr(m_BranchOnCount(), | |
| m_BranchOnTwoConds())))) { | |
| errs() << "VPlan vector loop exit must end with BranchOnCount, " | |
| "BranchOnCond, or BranchOnTwoConds VPInstruction\n"; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| bool llvm::verifyVPlanIsValid(const VPlan &Plan) { | |
| VPDominatorTree VPDT(const_cast<VPlan &>(Plan)); | |
| VPTypeAnalysis TypeInfo(Plan); | |
| VPlanVerifier Verifier(VPDT, TypeInfo); | |
| return Verifier.verify(Plan); | |
| } |