| // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s |
| |
| namespace A { |
| class String; // expected-note {{target of using declaration}} |
| }; |
| |
| using A::String; // expected-note {{using declaration}} |
| class String; // expected-error {{conflicts with target of using declaration}} |
| |
| // rdar://8603569 |
| union value { |
| char *String; |
| }; |
| |
| namespace UnambiguousStaticMemberTemplate { |
| // A static member template is not ambiguous if found in multiple base class |
| // subobjects. |
| struct A { template<typename T> static void f(T); static void g(); }; |
| struct B : A { using A::f; using A::g; }; |
| struct C : A { using A::f; using A::g; }; |
| struct D : B, C {}; |
| void f(D d) { d.f(0); d.g(); } |
| } |
| |
| namespace UnambiguousReorderedMembers { |
| // Static members are not ambiguous if we find them in a different order in |
| // multiple base classes. |
| struct A { static void f(); }; |
| struct B { static void f(int); }; |
| struct C : A, B { using A::f; using B::f; }; // expected-note {{found}} |
| struct D : B, A { using B::f; using A::f; }; |
| struct E : C, D {}; |
| void f(E e) { e.f(0); } |
| |
| // But a different declaration set in different base classes does result in ambiguity. |
| struct X : B, A { using B::f; using A::f; static void f(int, int); }; // expected-note {{found}} |
| struct Y : C, X {}; |
| void g(Y y) { y.f(0); } // expected-error {{found in multiple base classes of different types}} |
| } |