| //===-- DifferenceEngine.cpp - Structural function/module comparison ------===// | |
| // | |
| // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. | |
| // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. | |
| // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception | |
| // | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // | |
| // This header defines the implementation of the LLVM difference | |
| // engine, which structurally compares global values within a module. | |
| // | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| #include "DifferenceEngine.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/DenseSet.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/SmallString.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/StringSet.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/CFG.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Constants.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Function.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Module.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Support/type_traits.h" | |
| #include <utility> | |
| using namespace llvm; | |
| namespace { | |
| /// A priority queue, implemented as a heap. | |
| template <class T, class Sorter, unsigned InlineCapacity> | |
| class PriorityQueue { | |
| Sorter Precedes; | |
| llvm::SmallVector<T, InlineCapacity> Storage; | |
| public: | |
| PriorityQueue(const Sorter &Precedes) : Precedes(Precedes) {} | |
| /// Checks whether the heap is empty. | |
| bool empty() const { return Storage.empty(); } | |
| /// Insert a new value on the heap. | |
| void insert(const T &V) { | |
| unsigned Index = Storage.size(); | |
| Storage.push_back(V); | |
| if (Index == 0) return; | |
| T *data = Storage.data(); | |
| while (true) { | |
| unsigned Target = (Index + 1) / 2 - 1; | |
| if (!Precedes(data[Index], data[Target])) return; | |
| std::swap(data[Index], data[Target]); | |
| if (Target == 0) return; | |
| Index = Target; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| /// Remove the minimum value in the heap. Only valid on a non-empty heap. | |
| T remove_min() { | |
| assert(!empty()); | |
| T tmp = Storage[0]; | |
| unsigned NewSize = Storage.size() - 1; | |
| if (NewSize) { | |
| // Move the slot at the end to the beginning. | |
| if (std::is_trivially_copyable<T>::value) | |
| Storage[0] = Storage[NewSize]; | |
| else | |
| std::swap(Storage[0], Storage[NewSize]); | |
| // Bubble the root up as necessary. | |
| unsigned Index = 0; | |
| while (true) { | |
| // With a 1-based index, the children would be Index*2 and Index*2+1. | |
| unsigned R = (Index + 1) * 2; | |
| unsigned L = R - 1; | |
| // If R is out of bounds, we're done after this in any case. | |
| if (R >= NewSize) { | |
| // If L is also out of bounds, we're done immediately. | |
| if (L >= NewSize) break; | |
| // Otherwise, test whether we should swap L and Index. | |
| if (Precedes(Storage[L], Storage[Index])) | |
| std::swap(Storage[L], Storage[Index]); | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| // Otherwise, we need to compare with the smaller of L and R. | |
| // Prefer R because it's closer to the end of the array. | |
| unsigned IndexToTest = (Precedes(Storage[L], Storage[R]) ? L : R); | |
| // If Index is >= the min of L and R, then heap ordering is restored. | |
| if (!Precedes(Storage[IndexToTest], Storage[Index])) | |
| break; | |
| // Otherwise, keep bubbling up. | |
| std::swap(Storage[IndexToTest], Storage[Index]); | |
| Index = IndexToTest; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| Storage.pop_back(); | |
| return tmp; | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| /// A function-scope difference engine. | |
| class FunctionDifferenceEngine { | |
| DifferenceEngine &Engine; | |
| // Some initializers may reference the variable we're currently checking. This | |
| // can cause an infinite loop. The Saved[LR]HS ivars can be checked to prevent | |
| // recursing. | |
| const Value *SavedLHS; | |
| const Value *SavedRHS; | |
| // The current mapping from old local values to new local values. | |
| DenseMap<const Value *, const Value *> Values; | |
| // The current mapping from old blocks to new blocks. | |
| DenseMap<const BasicBlock *, const BasicBlock *> Blocks; | |
| // The tentative mapping from old local values while comparing a pair of | |
| // basic blocks. Once the pair has been processed, the tentative mapping is | |
| // committed to the Values map. | |
| DenseSet<std::pair<const Value *, const Value *>> TentativeValues; | |
| // Equivalence Assumptions | |
| // | |
| // For basic blocks in loops, some values in phi nodes may depend on | |
| // values from not yet processed basic blocks in the loop. When encountering | |
| // such values, we optimistically asssume their equivalence and store this | |
| // assumption in a BlockDiffCandidate for the pair of compared BBs. | |
| // | |
| // Once we have diffed all BBs, for every BlockDiffCandidate, we check all | |
| // stored assumptions using the Values map that stores proven equivalences | |
| // between the old and new values, and report a diff if an assumption cannot | |
| // be proven to be true. | |
| // | |
| // Note that after having made an assumption, all further determined | |
| // equivalences implicitly depend on that assumption. These will not be | |
| // reverted or reported if the assumption proves to be false, because these | |
| // are considered indirect diffs caused by earlier direct diffs. | |
| // | |
| // We aim to avoid false negatives in llvm-diff, that is, ensure that | |
| // whenever no diff is reported, the functions are indeed equal. If | |
| // assumptions were made, this is not entirely clear, because in principle we | |
| // could end up with a circular proof where the proof of equivalence of two | |
| // nodes is depending on the assumption of their equivalence. | |
| // | |
| // To see that assumptions do not add false negatives, note that if we do not | |
| // report a diff, this means that there is an equivalence mapping between old | |
| // and new values that is consistent with all assumptions made. The circular | |
| // dependency that exists on an IR value level does not exist at run time, | |
| // because the values selected by the phi nodes must always already have been | |
| // computed. Hence, we can prove equivalence of the old and new functions by | |
| // considering step-wise parallel execution, and incrementally proving | |
| // equivalence of every new computed value. Another way to think about it is | |
| // to imagine cloning the loop BBs for every iteration, turning the loops | |
| // into (possibly infinite) DAGs, and proving equivalence by induction on the | |
| // iteration, using the computed value mapping. | |
| // The class BlockDiffCandidate stores pairs which either have already been | |
| // proven to differ, or pairs whose equivalence depends on assumptions to be | |
| // verified later. | |
| struct BlockDiffCandidate { | |
| const BasicBlock *LBB; | |
| const BasicBlock *RBB; | |
| // Maps old values to assumed-to-be-equivalent new values | |
| SmallDenseMap<const Value *, const Value *> EquivalenceAssumptions; | |
| // If set, we already know the blocks differ. | |
| bool KnownToDiffer; | |
| }; | |
| // List of block diff candidates in the order found by processing. | |
| // We generate reports in this order. | |
| // For every LBB, there may only be one corresponding RBB. | |
| SmallVector<BlockDiffCandidate> BlockDiffCandidates; | |
| // Maps LBB to the index of its BlockDiffCandidate, if existing. | |
| DenseMap<const BasicBlock *, uint64_t> BlockDiffCandidateIndices; | |
| // Note: Every LBB must always be queried together with the same RBB. | |
| // The returned reference is not permanently valid and should not be stored. | |
| BlockDiffCandidate &getOrCreateBlockDiffCandidate(const BasicBlock *LBB, | |
| const BasicBlock *RBB) { | |
| auto [It, Inserted] = | |
| BlockDiffCandidateIndices.try_emplace(LBB, BlockDiffCandidates.size()); | |
| // Check if LBB already has a diff candidate | |
| if (Inserted) { | |
| // Add new one | |
| BlockDiffCandidates.push_back( | |
| {LBB, RBB, SmallDenseMap<const Value *, const Value *>(), false}); | |
| return BlockDiffCandidates.back(); | |
| } | |
| // Use existing one | |
| BlockDiffCandidate &Result = BlockDiffCandidates[It->second]; | |
| assert(Result.RBB == RBB && "Inconsistent basic block pairing!"); | |
| return Result; | |
| } | |
| // Optionally passed to equivalence checker functions, so these can add | |
| // assumptions in BlockDiffCandidates. Its presence controls whether | |
| // assumptions are generated. | |
| struct AssumptionContext { | |
| // The two basic blocks that need the two compared values to be equivalent. | |
| const BasicBlock *LBB; | |
| const BasicBlock *RBB; | |
| }; | |
| unsigned getUnprocPredCount(const BasicBlock *Block) const { | |
| return llvm::count_if(predecessors(Block), [&](const BasicBlock *Pred) { | |
| return !Blocks.contains(Pred); | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| typedef std::pair<const BasicBlock *, const BasicBlock *> BlockPair; | |
| /// A type which sorts a priority queue by the number of unprocessed | |
| /// predecessor blocks it has remaining. | |
| /// | |
| /// This is actually really expensive to calculate. | |
| struct QueueSorter { | |
| const FunctionDifferenceEngine &fde; | |
| explicit QueueSorter(const FunctionDifferenceEngine &fde) : fde(fde) {} | |
| bool operator()(BlockPair &Old, BlockPair &New) { | |
| return fde.getUnprocPredCount(Old.first) | |
| < fde.getUnprocPredCount(New.first); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| /// A queue of unified blocks to process. | |
| PriorityQueue<BlockPair, QueueSorter, 20> Queue; | |
| /// Try to unify the given two blocks. Enqueues them for processing | |
| /// if they haven't already been processed. | |
| /// | |
| /// Returns true if there was a problem unifying them. | |
| bool tryUnify(const BasicBlock *L, const BasicBlock *R) { | |
| const BasicBlock *&Ref = Blocks[L]; | |
| if (Ref) { | |
| if (Ref == R) return false; | |
| Engine.logf("successor %l cannot be equivalent to %r; " | |
| "it's already equivalent to %r") | |
| << L << R << Ref; | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| Ref = R; | |
| Queue.insert(BlockPair(L, R)); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| /// Unifies two instructions, given that they're known not to have | |
| /// structural differences. | |
| void unify(const Instruction *L, const Instruction *R) { | |
| DifferenceEngine::Context C(Engine, L, R); | |
| bool Result = diff(L, R, true, true, true); | |
| assert(!Result && "structural differences second time around?"); | |
| (void) Result; | |
| if (!L->use_empty()) | |
| Values[L] = R; | |
| } | |
| void processQueue() { | |
| while (!Queue.empty()) { | |
| BlockPair Pair = Queue.remove_min(); | |
| diff(Pair.first, Pair.second); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| void checkAndReportDiffCandidates() { | |
| for (BlockDiffCandidate &BDC : BlockDiffCandidates) { | |
| // Check assumptions | |
| for (const auto &[L, R] : BDC.EquivalenceAssumptions) { | |
| auto It = Values.find(L); | |
| if (It == Values.end() || It->second != R) { | |
| BDC.KnownToDiffer = true; | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // Run block diff if the BBs differ | |
| if (BDC.KnownToDiffer) { | |
| DifferenceEngine::Context C(Engine, BDC.LBB, BDC.RBB); | |
| runBlockDiff(BDC.LBB->begin(), BDC.RBB->begin()); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| void diff(const BasicBlock *L, const BasicBlock *R) { | |
| DifferenceEngine::Context C(Engine, L, R); | |
| BasicBlock::const_iterator LI = L->begin(), LE = L->end(); | |
| BasicBlock::const_iterator RI = R->begin(); | |
| do { | |
| assert(LI != LE && RI != R->end()); | |
| const Instruction *LeftI = &*LI, *RightI = &*RI; | |
| // If the instructions differ, start the more sophisticated diff | |
| // algorithm at the start of the block. | |
| if (diff(LeftI, RightI, false, false, true)) { | |
| TentativeValues.clear(); | |
| // Register (L, R) as diffing pair. Note that we could directly emit a | |
| // block diff here, but this way we ensure all diffs are emitted in one | |
| // consistent order, independent of whether the diffs were detected | |
| // immediately or via invalid assumptions. | |
| getOrCreateBlockDiffCandidate(L, R).KnownToDiffer = true; | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| // Otherwise, tentatively unify them. | |
| if (!LeftI->use_empty()) | |
| TentativeValues.insert(std::make_pair(LeftI, RightI)); | |
| ++LI; | |
| ++RI; | |
| } while (LI != LE); // This is sufficient: we can't get equality of | |
| // terminators if there are residual instructions. | |
| // Unify everything in the block, non-tentatively this time. | |
| TentativeValues.clear(); | |
| for (LI = L->begin(), RI = R->begin(); LI != LE; ++LI, ++RI) | |
| unify(&*LI, &*RI); | |
| } | |
| bool matchForBlockDiff(const Instruction *L, const Instruction *R); | |
| void runBlockDiff(BasicBlock::const_iterator LI, | |
| BasicBlock::const_iterator RI); | |
| bool diffCallSites(const CallBase &L, const CallBase &R, bool Complain, | |
| const AssumptionContext *AC) { | |
| // FIXME: call attributes | |
| if (!equivalentAsOperands(L.getCalledOperand(), R.getCalledOperand(), AC)) { | |
| if (Complain) Engine.log("called functions differ"); | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| if (L.arg_size() != R.arg_size()) { | |
| if (Complain) Engine.log("argument counts differ"); | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| for (unsigned I = 0, E = L.arg_size(); I != E; ++I) | |
| if (!equivalentAsOperands(L.getArgOperand(I), R.getArgOperand(I), AC)) { | |
| if (Complain) | |
| Engine.logf("arguments %l and %r differ") | |
| << L.getArgOperand(I) << R.getArgOperand(I); | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| // If AllowAssumptions is enabled, whenever we encounter a pair of values | |
| // that we cannot prove to be equivalent, we assume equivalence and store that | |
| // assumption to be checked later in BlockDiffCandidates. | |
| bool diff(const Instruction *L, const Instruction *R, bool Complain, | |
| bool TryUnify, bool AllowAssumptions) { | |
| // FIXME: metadata (if Complain is set) | |
| AssumptionContext ACValue = {L->getParent(), R->getParent()}; | |
| // nullptr AssumptionContext disables assumption generation. | |
| const AssumptionContext *AC = AllowAssumptions ? &ACValue : nullptr; | |
| // Different opcodes always imply different operations. | |
| if (L->getOpcode() != R->getOpcode()) { | |
| if (Complain) Engine.log("different instruction types"); | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| if (isa<CmpInst>(L)) { | |
| if (cast<CmpInst>(L)->getPredicate() | |
| != cast<CmpInst>(R)->getPredicate()) { | |
| if (Complain) Engine.log("different predicates"); | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| } else if (isa<CallInst>(L)) { | |
| return diffCallSites(cast<CallInst>(*L), cast<CallInst>(*R), Complain, | |
| AC); | |
| } else if (isa<PHINode>(L)) { | |
| const PHINode &LI = cast<PHINode>(*L); | |
| const PHINode &RI = cast<PHINode>(*R); | |
| // This is really weird; type uniquing is broken? | |
| if (LI.getType() != RI.getType()) { | |
| if (!LI.getType()->isPointerTy() || !RI.getType()->isPointerTy()) { | |
| if (Complain) Engine.log("different phi types"); | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| if (LI.getNumIncomingValues() != RI.getNumIncomingValues()) { | |
| if (Complain) | |
| Engine.log("PHI node # of incoming values differ"); | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| for (unsigned I = 0; I < LI.getNumIncomingValues(); ++I) { | |
| if (TryUnify) | |
| tryUnify(LI.getIncomingBlock(I), RI.getIncomingBlock(I)); | |
| if (!equivalentAsOperands(LI.getIncomingValue(I), | |
| RI.getIncomingValue(I), AC)) { | |
| if (Complain) | |
| Engine.log("PHI node incoming values differ"); | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| // Terminators. | |
| } else if (isa<InvokeInst>(L)) { | |
| const InvokeInst &LI = cast<InvokeInst>(*L); | |
| const InvokeInst &RI = cast<InvokeInst>(*R); | |
| if (diffCallSites(LI, RI, Complain, AC)) | |
| return true; | |
| if (TryUnify) { | |
| tryUnify(LI.getNormalDest(), RI.getNormalDest()); | |
| tryUnify(LI.getUnwindDest(), RI.getUnwindDest()); | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| } else if (isa<CallBrInst>(L)) { | |
| const CallBrInst &LI = cast<CallBrInst>(*L); | |
| const CallBrInst &RI = cast<CallBrInst>(*R); | |
| if (LI.getNumIndirectDests() != RI.getNumIndirectDests()) { | |
| if (Complain) | |
| Engine.log("callbr # of indirect destinations differ"); | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| // Perform the "try unify" step so that we can equate the indirect | |
| // destinations before checking the call site. | |
| for (unsigned I = 0; I < LI.getNumIndirectDests(); I++) | |
| tryUnify(LI.getIndirectDest(I), RI.getIndirectDest(I)); | |
| if (diffCallSites(LI, RI, Complain, AC)) | |
| return true; | |
| if (TryUnify) | |
| tryUnify(LI.getDefaultDest(), RI.getDefaultDest()); | |
| return false; | |
| } else if (isa<UncondBrInst>(L)) { | |
| if (TryUnify) | |
| tryUnify(L->getSuccessor(0), R->getSuccessor(0)); | |
| return false; | |
| } else if (isa<CondBrInst>(L)) { | |
| const CondBrInst *LI = cast<CondBrInst>(L); | |
| const CondBrInst *RI = cast<CondBrInst>(R); | |
| if (!equivalentAsOperands(LI->getCondition(), RI->getCondition(), AC)) { | |
| if (Complain) | |
| Engine.log("branch conditions differ"); | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| if (TryUnify) | |
| tryUnify(LI->getSuccessor(1), RI->getSuccessor(1)); | |
| if (TryUnify) tryUnify(LI->getSuccessor(0), RI->getSuccessor(0)); | |
| return false; | |
| } else if (isa<IndirectBrInst>(L)) { | |
| const IndirectBrInst *LI = cast<IndirectBrInst>(L); | |
| const IndirectBrInst *RI = cast<IndirectBrInst>(R); | |
| if (LI->getNumDestinations() != RI->getNumDestinations()) { | |
| if (Complain) Engine.log("indirectbr # of destinations differ"); | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| if (!equivalentAsOperands(LI->getAddress(), RI->getAddress(), AC)) { | |
| if (Complain) Engine.log("indirectbr addresses differ"); | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| if (TryUnify) { | |
| for (unsigned i = 0; i < LI->getNumDestinations(); i++) { | |
| tryUnify(LI->getDestination(i), RI->getDestination(i)); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| } else if (isa<SwitchInst>(L)) { | |
| const SwitchInst *LI = cast<SwitchInst>(L); | |
| const SwitchInst *RI = cast<SwitchInst>(R); | |
| if (!equivalentAsOperands(LI->getCondition(), RI->getCondition(), AC)) { | |
| if (Complain) Engine.log("switch conditions differ"); | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| if (TryUnify) tryUnify(LI->getDefaultDest(), RI->getDefaultDest()); | |
| bool Difference = false; | |
| DenseMap<const ConstantInt *, const BasicBlock *> LCases; | |
| for (auto Case : LI->cases()) | |
| LCases[Case.getCaseValue()] = Case.getCaseSuccessor(); | |
| for (auto Case : RI->cases()) { | |
| const ConstantInt *CaseValue = Case.getCaseValue(); | |
| const BasicBlock *LCase = LCases[CaseValue]; | |
| if (LCase) { | |
| if (TryUnify) | |
| tryUnify(LCase, Case.getCaseSuccessor()); | |
| LCases.erase(CaseValue); | |
| } else if (Complain || !Difference) { | |
| if (Complain) | |
| Engine.logf("right switch has extra case %r") << CaseValue; | |
| Difference = true; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| if (!Difference) | |
| for (DenseMap<const ConstantInt *, const BasicBlock *>::iterator | |
| I = LCases.begin(), | |
| E = LCases.end(); | |
| I != E; ++I) { | |
| if (Complain) | |
| Engine.logf("left switch has extra case %l") << I->first; | |
| Difference = true; | |
| } | |
| return Difference; | |
| } else if (isa<UnreachableInst>(L)) { | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| if (L->getNumOperands() != R->getNumOperands()) { | |
| if (Complain) Engine.log("instructions have different operand counts"); | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| for (unsigned I = 0, E = L->getNumOperands(); I != E; ++I) { | |
| Value *LO = L->getOperand(I), *RO = R->getOperand(I); | |
| if (!equivalentAsOperands(LO, RO, AC)) { | |
| if (Complain) Engine.logf("operands %l and %r differ") << LO << RO; | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| public: | |
| bool equivalentAsOperands(const Constant *L, const Constant *R, | |
| const AssumptionContext *AC) { | |
| // Use equality as a preliminary filter. | |
| if (L == R) | |
| return true; | |
| if (L->getValueID() != R->getValueID()) | |
| return false; | |
| // Ask the engine about global values. | |
| if (isa<GlobalValue>(L)) | |
| return Engine.equivalentAsOperands(cast<GlobalValue>(L), | |
| cast<GlobalValue>(R)); | |
| // Compare constant expressions structurally. | |
| if (isa<ConstantExpr>(L)) | |
| return equivalentAsOperands(cast<ConstantExpr>(L), cast<ConstantExpr>(R), | |
| AC); | |
| // Constants of the "same type" don't always actually have the same | |
| // type; I don't know why. Just white-list them. | |
| if (isa<ConstantPointerNull>(L) || isa<UndefValue>(L) || isa<ConstantAggregateZero>(L)) | |
| return true; | |
| // Block addresses only match if we've already encountered the | |
| // block. FIXME: tentative matches? | |
| if (isa<BlockAddress>(L)) | |
| return Blocks[cast<BlockAddress>(L)->getBasicBlock()] | |
| == cast<BlockAddress>(R)->getBasicBlock(); | |
| // If L and R are ConstantVectors, compare each element | |
| if (isa<ConstantVector>(L)) { | |
| const ConstantVector *CVL = cast<ConstantVector>(L); | |
| const ConstantVector *CVR = cast<ConstantVector>(R); | |
| if (CVL->getType()->getNumElements() != CVR->getType()->getNumElements()) | |
| return false; | |
| for (unsigned i = 0; i < CVL->getType()->getNumElements(); i++) { | |
| if (!equivalentAsOperands(CVL->getOperand(i), CVR->getOperand(i), AC)) | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| // If L and R are ConstantArrays, compare the element count and types. | |
| if (isa<ConstantArray>(L)) { | |
| const ConstantArray *CAL = cast<ConstantArray>(L); | |
| const ConstantArray *CAR = cast<ConstantArray>(R); | |
| // Sometimes a type may be equivalent, but not uniquified---e.g. it may | |
| // contain a GEP instruction. Do a deeper comparison of the types. | |
| if (CAL->getType()->getNumElements() != CAR->getType()->getNumElements()) | |
| return false; | |
| for (unsigned I = 0; I < CAL->getType()->getNumElements(); ++I) { | |
| if (!equivalentAsOperands(CAL->getAggregateElement(I), | |
| CAR->getAggregateElement(I), AC)) | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| // If L and R are ConstantStructs, compare each field and type. | |
| if (isa<ConstantStruct>(L)) { | |
| const ConstantStruct *CSL = cast<ConstantStruct>(L); | |
| const ConstantStruct *CSR = cast<ConstantStruct>(R); | |
| const StructType *LTy = cast<StructType>(CSL->getType()); | |
| const StructType *RTy = cast<StructType>(CSR->getType()); | |
| // The StructTypes should have the same attributes. Don't use | |
| // isLayoutIdentical(), because that just checks the element pointers, | |
| // which may not work here. | |
| if (LTy->getNumElements() != RTy->getNumElements() || | |
| LTy->isPacked() != RTy->isPacked()) | |
| return false; | |
| for (unsigned I = 0; I < LTy->getNumElements(); I++) { | |
| const Value *LAgg = CSL->getAggregateElement(I); | |
| const Value *RAgg = CSR->getAggregateElement(I); | |
| if (LAgg == SavedLHS || RAgg == SavedRHS) { | |
| if (LAgg != SavedLHS || RAgg != SavedRHS) | |
| // If the left and right operands aren't both re-analyzing the | |
| // variable, then the initialiers don't match, so report "false". | |
| // Otherwise, we skip these operands.. | |
| return false; | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| if (!equivalentAsOperands(LAgg, RAgg, AC)) { | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| bool equivalentAsOperands(const ConstantExpr *L, const ConstantExpr *R, | |
| const AssumptionContext *AC) { | |
| if (L == R) | |
| return true; | |
| if (L->getOpcode() != R->getOpcode()) | |
| return false; | |
| switch (L->getOpcode()) { | |
| case Instruction::GetElementPtr: | |
| // FIXME: inbounds? | |
| break; | |
| default: | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| if (L->getNumOperands() != R->getNumOperands()) | |
| return false; | |
| for (unsigned I = 0, E = L->getNumOperands(); I != E; ++I) { | |
| const auto *LOp = L->getOperand(I); | |
| const auto *ROp = R->getOperand(I); | |
| if (LOp == SavedLHS || ROp == SavedRHS) { | |
| if (LOp != SavedLHS || ROp != SavedRHS) | |
| // If the left and right operands aren't both re-analyzing the | |
| // variable, then the initialiers don't match, so report "false". | |
| // Otherwise, we skip these operands.. | |
| return false; | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| if (!equivalentAsOperands(LOp, ROp, AC)) | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| // There are cases where we cannot determine whether two values are | |
| // equivalent, because it depends on not yet processed basic blocks -- see the | |
| // documentation on assumptions. | |
| // | |
| // AC is the context in which we are currently performing a diff. | |
| // When we encounter a pair of values for which we can neither prove | |
| // equivalence nor the opposite, we do the following: | |
| // * If AC is nullptr, we treat the pair as non-equivalent. | |
| // * If AC is set, we add an assumption for the basic blocks given by AC, | |
| // and treat the pair as equivalent. The assumption is checked later. | |
| bool equivalentAsOperands(const Value *L, const Value *R, | |
| const AssumptionContext *AC) { | |
| // Fall out if the values have different kind. | |
| // This possibly shouldn't take priority over oracles. | |
| if (L->getValueID() != R->getValueID()) | |
| return false; | |
| // Value subtypes: Argument, Constant, Instruction, BasicBlock, | |
| // InlineAsm, MDNode, MDString, PseudoSourceValue | |
| if (isa<Constant>(L)) | |
| return equivalentAsOperands(cast<Constant>(L), cast<Constant>(R), AC); | |
| if (isa<Instruction>(L)) { | |
| auto It = Values.find(L); | |
| if (It != Values.end()) | |
| return It->second == R; | |
| if (TentativeValues.count(std::make_pair(L, R))) | |
| return true; | |
| // L and R might be equivalent, this could depend on not yet processed | |
| // basic blocks, so we cannot decide here. | |
| if (AC) { | |
| // Add an assumption, unless there is a conflict with an existing one | |
| BlockDiffCandidate &BDC = | |
| getOrCreateBlockDiffCandidate(AC->LBB, AC->RBB); | |
| auto InsertionResult = BDC.EquivalenceAssumptions.insert({L, R}); | |
| if (!InsertionResult.second && InsertionResult.first->second != R) { | |
| // We already have a conflicting equivalence assumption for L, so at | |
| // least one must be wrong, and we know that there is a diff. | |
| BDC.KnownToDiffer = true; | |
| BDC.EquivalenceAssumptions.clear(); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| // Optimistically assume equivalence, and check later once all BBs | |
| // have been processed. | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| // Assumptions disabled, so pessimistically assume non-equivalence. | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| if (isa<Argument>(L)) | |
| return Values[L] == R; | |
| if (isa<BasicBlock>(L)) | |
| return Blocks[cast<BasicBlock>(L)] != R; | |
| // Pretend everything else is identical. | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| // Avoid a gcc warning about accessing 'this' in an initializer. | |
| FunctionDifferenceEngine *this_() { return this; } | |
| public: | |
| FunctionDifferenceEngine(DifferenceEngine &Engine, | |
| const Value *SavedLHS = nullptr, | |
| const Value *SavedRHS = nullptr) | |
| : Engine(Engine), SavedLHS(SavedLHS), SavedRHS(SavedRHS), | |
| Queue(QueueSorter(*this_())) {} | |
| void diff(const Function *L, const Function *R) { | |
| assert(Values.empty() && "Multiple diffs per engine are not supported!"); | |
| if (L->arg_size() != R->arg_size()) | |
| Engine.log("different argument counts"); | |
| // Map the arguments. | |
| for (Function::const_arg_iterator LI = L->arg_begin(), LE = L->arg_end(), | |
| RI = R->arg_begin(), RE = R->arg_end(); | |
| LI != LE && RI != RE; ++LI, ++RI) | |
| Values[&*LI] = &*RI; | |
| tryUnify(&*L->begin(), &*R->begin()); | |
| processQueue(); | |
| checkAndReportDiffCandidates(); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| struct DiffEntry { | |
| DiffEntry() = default; | |
| unsigned Cost = 0; | |
| llvm::SmallVector<char, 8> Path; // actually of DifferenceEngine::DiffChange | |
| }; | |
| bool FunctionDifferenceEngine::matchForBlockDiff(const Instruction *L, | |
| const Instruction *R) { | |
| return !diff(L, R, false, false, false); | |
| } | |
| void FunctionDifferenceEngine::runBlockDiff(BasicBlock::const_iterator LStart, | |
| BasicBlock::const_iterator RStart) { | |
| BasicBlock::const_iterator LE = LStart->getParent()->end(); | |
| BasicBlock::const_iterator RE = RStart->getParent()->end(); | |
| unsigned NL = std::distance(LStart, LE); | |
| SmallVector<DiffEntry, 20> Paths1(NL+1); | |
| SmallVector<DiffEntry, 20> Paths2(NL+1); | |
| DiffEntry *Cur = Paths1.data(); | |
| DiffEntry *Next = Paths2.data(); | |
| const unsigned LeftCost = 2; | |
| const unsigned RightCost = 2; | |
| const unsigned MatchCost = 0; | |
| assert(TentativeValues.empty()); | |
| // Initialize the first column. | |
| for (unsigned I = 0; I != NL+1; ++I) { | |
| Cur[I].Cost = I * LeftCost; | |
| for (unsigned J = 0; J != I; ++J) | |
| Cur[I].Path.push_back(DC_left); | |
| } | |
| for (BasicBlock::const_iterator RI = RStart; RI != RE; ++RI) { | |
| // Initialize the first row. | |
| Next[0] = Cur[0]; | |
| Next[0].Cost += RightCost; | |
| Next[0].Path.push_back(DC_right); | |
| unsigned Index = 1; | |
| for (BasicBlock::const_iterator LI = LStart; LI != LE; ++LI, ++Index) { | |
| if (matchForBlockDiff(&*LI, &*RI)) { | |
| Next[Index] = Cur[Index-1]; | |
| Next[Index].Cost += MatchCost; | |
| Next[Index].Path.push_back(DC_match); | |
| TentativeValues.insert(std::make_pair(&*LI, &*RI)); | |
| } else if (Next[Index-1].Cost <= Cur[Index].Cost) { | |
| Next[Index] = Next[Index-1]; | |
| Next[Index].Cost += LeftCost; | |
| Next[Index].Path.push_back(DC_left); | |
| } else { | |
| Next[Index] = Cur[Index]; | |
| Next[Index].Cost += RightCost; | |
| Next[Index].Path.push_back(DC_right); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| std::swap(Cur, Next); | |
| } | |
| // We don't need the tentative values anymore; everything from here | |
| // on out should be non-tentative. | |
| TentativeValues.clear(); | |
| SmallVectorImpl<char> &Path = Cur[NL].Path; | |
| BasicBlock::const_iterator LI = LStart, RI = RStart; | |
| DiffLogBuilder Diff(Engine.getConsumer()); | |
| // Drop trailing matches. | |
| while (Path.size() && Path.back() == DC_match) | |
| Path.pop_back(); | |
| // Skip leading matches. | |
| SmallVectorImpl<char>::iterator | |
| PI = Path.begin(), PE = Path.end(); | |
| while (PI != PE && *PI == DC_match) { | |
| unify(&*LI, &*RI); | |
| ++PI; | |
| ++LI; | |
| ++RI; | |
| } | |
| for (; PI != PE; ++PI) { | |
| switch (static_cast<DiffChange>(*PI)) { | |
| case DC_match: | |
| assert(LI != LE && RI != RE); | |
| { | |
| const Instruction *L = &*LI, *R = &*RI; | |
| unify(L, R); | |
| Diff.addMatch(L, R); | |
| } | |
| ++LI; ++RI; | |
| break; | |
| case DC_left: | |
| assert(LI != LE); | |
| Diff.addLeft(&*LI); | |
| ++LI; | |
| break; | |
| case DC_right: | |
| assert(RI != RE); | |
| Diff.addRight(&*RI); | |
| ++RI; | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // Finishing unifying and complaining about the tails of the block, | |
| // which should be matches all the way through. | |
| while (LI != LE) { | |
| assert(RI != RE); | |
| unify(&*LI, &*RI); | |
| ++LI; | |
| ++RI; | |
| } | |
| // If the terminators have different kinds, but one is an invoke and the | |
| // other is an unconditional branch immediately following a call, unify | |
| // the results and the destinations. | |
| const Instruction *LTerm = LStart->getParent()->getTerminator(); | |
| const Instruction *RTerm = RStart->getParent()->getTerminator(); | |
| if (isa<UncondBrInst>(LTerm) && isa<InvokeInst>(RTerm)) { | |
| BasicBlock::const_iterator I = LTerm->getIterator(); | |
| if (I == LStart->getParent()->begin()) return; | |
| --I; | |
| if (!isa<CallInst>(*I)) return; | |
| const CallInst *LCall = cast<CallInst>(&*I); | |
| const InvokeInst *RInvoke = cast<InvokeInst>(RTerm); | |
| if (!equivalentAsOperands(LCall->getCalledOperand(), | |
| RInvoke->getCalledOperand(), nullptr)) | |
| return; | |
| if (!LCall->use_empty()) | |
| Values[LCall] = RInvoke; | |
| tryUnify(LTerm->getSuccessor(0), RInvoke->getNormalDest()); | |
| } else if (isa<InvokeInst>(LTerm) && isa<UncondBrInst>(RTerm)) { | |
| BasicBlock::const_iterator I = RTerm->getIterator(); | |
| if (I == RStart->getParent()->begin()) return; | |
| --I; | |
| if (!isa<CallInst>(*I)) return; | |
| const CallInst *RCall = cast<CallInst>(I); | |
| const InvokeInst *LInvoke = cast<InvokeInst>(LTerm); | |
| if (!equivalentAsOperands(LInvoke->getCalledOperand(), | |
| RCall->getCalledOperand(), nullptr)) | |
| return; | |
| if (!LInvoke->use_empty()) | |
| Values[LInvoke] = RCall; | |
| tryUnify(LInvoke->getNormalDest(), RTerm->getSuccessor(0)); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| void DifferenceEngine::Oracle::anchor() { } | |
| void DifferenceEngine::diff(const Function *L, const Function *R) { | |
| Context C(*this, L, R); | |
| // FIXME: types | |
| // FIXME: attributes and CC | |
| // FIXME: parameter attributes | |
| // If both are declarations, we're done. | |
| if (L->empty() && R->empty()) | |
| return; | |
| else if (L->empty()) | |
| log("left function is declaration, right function is definition"); | |
| else if (R->empty()) | |
| log("right function is declaration, left function is definition"); | |
| else | |
| FunctionDifferenceEngine(*this).diff(L, R); | |
| } | |
| void DifferenceEngine::diff(const Module *L, const Module *R) { | |
| StringSet<> LNames; | |
| SmallVector<std::pair<const Function *, const Function *>, 20> Queue; | |
| unsigned LeftAnonCount = 0; | |
| unsigned RightAnonCount = 0; | |
| for (Module::const_iterator I = L->begin(), E = L->end(); I != E; ++I) { | |
| const Function *LFn = &*I; | |
| StringRef Name = LFn->getName(); | |
| if (Name.empty()) { | |
| ++LeftAnonCount; | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| LNames.insert(Name); | |
| if (Function *RFn = R->getFunction(LFn->getName())) | |
| Queue.push_back(std::make_pair(LFn, RFn)); | |
| else | |
| logf("function %l exists only in left module") << LFn; | |
| } | |
| for (Module::const_iterator I = R->begin(), E = R->end(); I != E; ++I) { | |
| const Function *RFn = &*I; | |
| StringRef Name = RFn->getName(); | |
| if (Name.empty()) { | |
| ++RightAnonCount; | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| if (!LNames.count(Name)) | |
| logf("function %r exists only in right module") << RFn; | |
| } | |
| if (LeftAnonCount != 0 || RightAnonCount != 0) { | |
| SmallString<32> Tmp; | |
| logf(("not comparing " + Twine(LeftAnonCount) + | |
| " anonymous functions in the left module and " + | |
| Twine(RightAnonCount) + " in the right module") | |
| .toStringRef(Tmp)); | |
| } | |
| for (SmallVectorImpl<std::pair<const Function *, const Function *>>::iterator | |
| I = Queue.begin(), | |
| E = Queue.end(); | |
| I != E; ++I) | |
| diff(I->first, I->second); | |
| } | |
| bool DifferenceEngine::equivalentAsOperands(const GlobalValue *L, | |
| const GlobalValue *R) { | |
| if (globalValueOracle) return (*globalValueOracle)(L, R); | |
| if (isa<GlobalVariable>(L) && isa<GlobalVariable>(R)) { | |
| const GlobalVariable *GVL = cast<GlobalVariable>(L); | |
| const GlobalVariable *GVR = cast<GlobalVariable>(R); | |
| if (GVL->hasLocalLinkage() && GVL->hasUniqueInitializer() && | |
| GVR->hasLocalLinkage() && GVR->hasUniqueInitializer()) | |
| return FunctionDifferenceEngine(*this, GVL, GVR) | |
| .equivalentAsOperands(GVL->getInitializer(), GVR->getInitializer(), | |
| nullptr); | |
| } | |
| return L->getName() == R->getName(); | |
| } |