| //===-- VPlanVerifier.cpp -------------------------------------------------===// |
| // |
| // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. |
| // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. |
| // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception |
| // |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| /// |
| /// \file |
| /// This file defines the class VPlanVerifier, which contains utility functions |
| /// to check the consistency and invariants of a VPlan. |
| /// |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| |
| #include "VPlanVerifier.h" |
| #include "VPlan.h" |
| #include "VPlanCFG.h" |
| #include "VPlanDominatorTree.h" |
| #include "VPlanHelpers.h" |
| #include "VPlanPatternMatch.h" |
| #include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h" |
| #include "llvm/ADT/TypeSwitch.h" |
| |
| #define DEBUG_TYPE "loop-vectorize" |
| |
| using namespace llvm; |
| |
| namespace { |
| class VPlanVerifier { |
| const VPDominatorTree &VPDT; |
| VPTypeAnalysis &TypeInfo; |
| bool VerifyLate; |
| |
| SmallPtrSet<BasicBlock *, 8> WrappedIRBBs; |
| |
| // Verify that phi-like recipes are at the beginning of \p VPBB, with no |
| // other recipes in between. Also check that only header blocks contain |
| // VPHeaderPHIRecipes. |
| bool verifyPhiRecipes(const VPBasicBlock *VPBB); |
| |
| /// Verify that \p EVL is used correctly. The user must be either in |
| /// EVL-based recipes as a last operand or VPInstruction::Add which is |
| /// incoming value into EVL's recipe. |
| bool verifyEVLRecipe(const VPInstruction &EVL) const; |
| |
| bool verifyVPBasicBlock(const VPBasicBlock *VPBB); |
| |
| bool verifyBlock(const VPBlockBase *VPB); |
| |
| /// Helper function that verifies the CFG invariants of the VPBlockBases |
| /// within |
| /// \p Region. Checks in this function are generic for VPBlockBases. They are |
| /// not specific for VPBasicBlocks or VPRegionBlocks. |
| bool verifyBlocksInRegion(const VPRegionBlock *Region); |
| |
| /// Verify the CFG invariants of VPRegionBlock \p Region and its nested |
| /// VPBlockBases. Do not recurse inside nested VPRegionBlocks. |
| bool verifyRegion(const VPRegionBlock *Region); |
| |
| /// Verify the CFG invariants of VPRegionBlock \p Region and its nested |
| /// VPBlockBases. Recurse inside nested VPRegionBlocks. |
| bool verifyRegionRec(const VPRegionBlock *Region); |
| |
| public: |
| VPlanVerifier(VPDominatorTree &VPDT, VPTypeAnalysis &TypeInfo, |
| bool VerifyLate) |
| : VPDT(VPDT), TypeInfo(TypeInfo), VerifyLate(VerifyLate) {} |
| |
| bool verify(const VPlan &Plan); |
| }; |
| } // namespace |
| |
| bool VPlanVerifier::verifyPhiRecipes(const VPBasicBlock *VPBB) { |
| auto RecipeI = VPBB->begin(); |
| auto End = VPBB->end(); |
| unsigned NumActiveLaneMaskPhiRecipes = 0; |
| bool IsHeaderVPBB = VPBlockUtils::isHeader(VPBB, VPDT); |
| while (RecipeI != End && RecipeI->isPhi()) { |
| if (isa<VPActiveLaneMaskPHIRecipe>(RecipeI)) |
| NumActiveLaneMaskPhiRecipes++; |
| |
| if (IsHeaderVPBB && |
| !isa<VPHeaderPHIRecipe, VPWidenPHIRecipe, VPPhi>(*RecipeI)) { |
| errs() << "Found non-header PHI recipe in header VPBB"; |
| #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) |
| errs() << ": "; |
| RecipeI->dump(); |
| #endif |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| if (!IsHeaderVPBB && isa<VPHeaderPHIRecipe>(*RecipeI)) { |
| errs() << "Found header PHI recipe in non-header VPBB"; |
| #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) |
| errs() << ": "; |
| RecipeI->dump(); |
| #endif |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| // Check if the recipe operands match the number of predecessors. |
| // TODO Extend to other phi-like recipes. |
| if (auto *PhiIRI = dyn_cast<VPIRPhi>(&*RecipeI)) { |
| if (PhiIRI->getNumOperands() != VPBB->getNumPredecessors()) { |
| errs() << "Phi-like recipe with different number of operands and " |
| "predecessors.\n"; |
| // TODO: Print broken recipe. At the moment printing an ill-formed |
| // phi-like recipe may crash. |
| return false; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| RecipeI++; |
| } |
| |
| if (!VerifyLate && NumActiveLaneMaskPhiRecipes > 1) { |
| errs() << "There should be no more than one VPActiveLaneMaskPHIRecipe"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| while (RecipeI != End) { |
| if (RecipeI->isPhi() && !isa<VPBlendRecipe>(&*RecipeI)) { |
| errs() << "Found phi-like recipe after non-phi recipe"; |
| |
| #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) |
| errs() << ": "; |
| RecipeI->dump(); |
| errs() << "after\n"; |
| std::prev(RecipeI)->dump(); |
| #endif |
| return false; |
| } |
| RecipeI++; |
| } |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| bool VPlanVerifier::verifyEVLRecipe(const VPInstruction &EVL) const { |
| if (EVL.getOpcode() != VPInstruction::ExplicitVectorLength) { |
| errs() << "verifyEVLRecipe should only be called on " |
| "VPInstruction::ExplicitVectorLength\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| auto VerifyEVLUse = [&](const VPRecipeBase &R, |
| const unsigned ExpectedIdx) -> bool { |
| SmallVector<const VPValue *> Ops(R.operands()); |
| unsigned UseCount = count(Ops, &EVL); |
| if (UseCount != 1 || Ops[ExpectedIdx] != &EVL) { |
| errs() << "EVL is used as non-last operand in EVL-based recipe\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| return true; |
| }; |
| return all_of(EVL.users(), [this, &VerifyEVLUse](VPUser *U) { |
| return TypeSwitch<const VPUser *, bool>(U) |
| .Case<VPWidenIntrinsicRecipe>([&](const VPWidenIntrinsicRecipe *S) { |
| return VerifyEVLUse(*S, S->getNumOperands() - 1); |
| }) |
| .Case<VPWidenStoreEVLRecipe, VPReductionEVLRecipe, |
| VPWidenIntOrFpInductionRecipe, VPWidenPointerInductionRecipe>( |
| [&](const VPRecipeBase *S) { return VerifyEVLUse(*S, 2); }) |
| .Case<VPScalarIVStepsRecipe>([&](auto *R) { |
| if (R->getNumOperands() != 3) { |
| errs() << "Unrolling with EVL tail folding not yet supported\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| return VerifyEVLUse(*R, 2); |
| }) |
| .Case<VPWidenLoadEVLRecipe, VPVectorEndPointerRecipe>( |
| [&](const VPRecipeBase *R) { return VerifyEVLUse(*R, 1); }) |
| .Case<VPInstructionWithType>( |
| [&](const VPInstructionWithType *S) { return VerifyEVLUse(*S, 0); }) |
| .Case<VPInstruction>([&](const VPInstruction *I) { |
| if (I->getOpcode() == Instruction::PHI || |
| I->getOpcode() == Instruction::ICmp || |
| I->getOpcode() == Instruction::Sub) |
| return VerifyEVLUse(*I, 1); |
| switch (I->getOpcode()) { |
| case Instruction::Add: |
| break; |
| case Instruction::UIToFP: |
| case Instruction::Trunc: |
| case Instruction::ZExt: |
| case Instruction::Mul: |
| case Instruction::FMul: |
| case VPInstruction::Broadcast: |
| // Opcodes above can only use EVL after wide inductions have been |
| // expanded. |
| if (!VerifyLate) { |
| errs() << "EVL used by unexpected VPInstruction\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| break; |
| default: |
| errs() << "EVL used by unexpected VPInstruction\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| // EVLIVIncrement is only used by EVLIV & BranchOnCount. |
| // Having more than two users is unexpected. |
| if ((I->getNumUsers() != 1) && |
| (I->getNumUsers() != 2 || none_of(I->users(), [&I](VPUser *U) { |
| using namespace llvm::VPlanPatternMatch; |
| return match(U, m_BranchOnCount(m_Specific(I), m_VPValue())); |
| }))) { |
| errs() << "EVL is used in VPInstruction with multiple users\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| if (!VerifyLate && !isa<VPEVLBasedIVPHIRecipe>(*I->users().begin())) { |
| errs() << "Result of VPInstruction::Add with EVL operand is " |
| "not used by VPEVLBasedIVPHIRecipe\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| return true; |
| }) |
| .Default([&](const VPUser *U) { |
| errs() << "EVL has unexpected user\n"; |
| return false; |
| }); |
| }); |
| } |
| |
| bool VPlanVerifier::verifyVPBasicBlock(const VPBasicBlock *VPBB) { |
| if (!verifyPhiRecipes(VPBB)) |
| return false; |
| |
| // Verify that defs in VPBB dominate all their uses. |
| DenseMap<const VPRecipeBase *, unsigned> RecipeNumbering; |
| unsigned Cnt = 0; |
| for (const VPRecipeBase &R : *VPBB) |
| RecipeNumbering[&R] = Cnt++; |
| |
| for (const VPRecipeBase &R : *VPBB) { |
| if (isa<VPIRInstruction>(&R) && !isa<VPIRBasicBlock>(VPBB)) { |
| errs() << "VPIRInstructions "; |
| #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) |
| R.dump(); |
| errs() << " "; |
| #endif |
| errs() << "not in a VPIRBasicBlock!\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| for (const VPValue *V : R.definedValues()) { |
| // Verify that we can infer a scalar type for each defined value. With |
| // assertions enabled, inferScalarType will perform some consistency |
| // checks during type inference. |
| if (!TypeInfo.inferScalarType(V)) { |
| errs() << "Failed to infer scalar type!\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| for (const VPUser *U : V->users()) { |
| auto *UI = cast<VPRecipeBase>(U); |
| if (auto *Phi = dyn_cast<VPPhiAccessors>(UI)) { |
| for (const auto &[IncomingVPV, IncomingVPBB] : |
| Phi->incoming_values_and_blocks()) { |
| if (IncomingVPV != V) |
| continue; |
| |
| if (VPDT.dominates(VPBB, IncomingVPBB)) |
| continue; |
| |
| errs() << "Incoming def does not dominate incoming block!\n"; |
| #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) |
| VPSlotTracker Tracker(VPBB->getPlan()); |
| IncomingVPV->getDefiningRecipe()->print(errs(), " ", Tracker); |
| errs() << "\n does not dominate " << IncomingVPBB->getName() |
| << " for\n"; |
| UI->print(errs(), " ", Tracker); |
| #endif |
| return false; |
| } |
| continue; |
| } |
| // TODO: Also verify VPPredInstPHIRecipe. |
| if (isa<VPPredInstPHIRecipe>(UI)) |
| continue; |
| |
| // If the user is in the same block, check it comes after R in the |
| // block. |
| if (UI->getParent() == VPBB) { |
| if (RecipeNumbering[UI] >= RecipeNumbering[&R]) |
| continue; |
| } else { |
| if (VPDT.dominates(VPBB, UI->getParent())) |
| continue; |
| } |
| |
| errs() << "Use before def!\n"; |
| #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) |
| VPSlotTracker Tracker(VPBB->getPlan()); |
| UI->print(errs(), " ", Tracker); |
| errs() << "\n before\n"; |
| R.print(errs(), " ", Tracker); |
| errs() << "\n"; |
| #endif |
| return false; |
| } |
| } |
| if (const auto *EVL = dyn_cast<VPInstruction>(&R)) { |
| if (EVL->getOpcode() == VPInstruction::ExplicitVectorLength && |
| !verifyEVLRecipe(*EVL)) { |
| errs() << "EVL VPValue is not used correctly\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| auto *IRBB = dyn_cast<VPIRBasicBlock>(VPBB); |
| if (!IRBB) |
| return true; |
| |
| if (!WrappedIRBBs.insert(IRBB->getIRBasicBlock()).second) { |
| errs() << "Same IR basic block used by multiple wrapper blocks!\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| /// Utility function that checks whether \p VPBlockVec has duplicate |
| /// VPBlockBases. |
| static bool hasDuplicates(const SmallVectorImpl<VPBlockBase *> &VPBlockVec) { |
| SmallDenseSet<const VPBlockBase *, 8> VPBlockSet; |
| for (const auto *Block : VPBlockVec) { |
| if (!VPBlockSet.insert(Block).second) |
| return true; |
| } |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| bool VPlanVerifier::verifyBlock(const VPBlockBase *VPB) { |
| auto *VPBB = dyn_cast<VPBasicBlock>(VPB); |
| // Check block's condition bit. |
| if (!isa<VPIRBasicBlock>(VPB)) { |
| if (VPB->getNumSuccessors() > 1 || |
| (VPBB && VPBB->getParent() && VPBB->isExiting() && |
| !VPBB->getParent()->isReplicator())) { |
| if (!VPBB || !VPBB->getTerminator()) { |
| errs() << "Block has multiple successors but doesn't " |
| "have a proper branch recipe!\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| } else { |
| if (VPBB && VPBB->getTerminator()) { |
| errs() << "Unexpected branch recipe!\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Check block's successors. |
| const auto &Successors = VPB->getSuccessors(); |
| // There must be only one instance of a successor in block's successor list. |
| // TODO: This won't work for switch statements. |
| if (hasDuplicates(Successors)) { |
| errs() << "Multiple instances of the same successor.\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| for (const VPBlockBase *Succ : Successors) { |
| // There must be a bi-directional link between block and successor. |
| const auto &SuccPreds = Succ->getPredecessors(); |
| if (!is_contained(SuccPreds, VPB)) { |
| errs() << "Missing predecessor link.\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Check block's predecessors. |
| const auto &Predecessors = VPB->getPredecessors(); |
| // There must be only one instance of a predecessor in block's predecessor |
| // list. |
| // TODO: This won't work for switch statements. |
| if (hasDuplicates(Predecessors)) { |
| errs() << "Multiple instances of the same predecessor.\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| for (const VPBlockBase *Pred : Predecessors) { |
| // Block and predecessor must be inside the same region. |
| if (Pred->getParent() != VPB->getParent()) { |
| errs() << "Predecessor is not in the same region.\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| // There must be a bi-directional link between block and predecessor. |
| const auto &PredSuccs = Pred->getSuccessors(); |
| if (!is_contained(PredSuccs, VPB)) { |
| errs() << "Missing successor link.\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| } |
| return !VPBB || verifyVPBasicBlock(VPBB); |
| } |
| |
| bool VPlanVerifier::verifyBlocksInRegion(const VPRegionBlock *Region) { |
| for (const VPBlockBase *VPB : vp_depth_first_shallow(Region->getEntry())) { |
| // Check block's parent. |
| if (VPB->getParent() != Region) { |
| errs() << "VPBlockBase has wrong parent\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| if (!verifyBlock(VPB)) |
| return false; |
| } |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| bool VPlanVerifier::verifyRegion(const VPRegionBlock *Region) { |
| const VPBlockBase *Entry = Region->getEntry(); |
| const VPBlockBase *Exiting = Region->getExiting(); |
| |
| // Entry and Exiting shouldn't have any predecessor/successor, respectively. |
| if (Entry->getNumPredecessors() != 0) { |
| errs() << "region entry block has predecessors\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| if (Exiting->getNumSuccessors() != 0) { |
| errs() << "region exiting block has successors\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| return verifyBlocksInRegion(Region); |
| } |
| |
| bool VPlanVerifier::verifyRegionRec(const VPRegionBlock *Region) { |
| // Recurse inside nested regions and check all blocks inside the region. |
| return verifyRegion(Region) && |
| all_of(vp_depth_first_shallow(Region->getEntry()), |
| [this](const VPBlockBase *VPB) { |
| const auto *SubRegion = dyn_cast<VPRegionBlock>(VPB); |
| return !SubRegion || verifyRegionRec(SubRegion); |
| }); |
| } |
| |
| bool VPlanVerifier::verify(const VPlan &Plan) { |
| if (any_of(vp_depth_first_shallow(Plan.getEntry()), |
| [this](const VPBlockBase *VPB) { return !verifyBlock(VPB); })) |
| return false; |
| |
| const VPRegionBlock *TopRegion = Plan.getVectorLoopRegion(); |
| // TODO: Verify all blocks using vp_depth_first_deep iterators. |
| if (!TopRegion) |
| return true; |
| |
| if (!verifyRegionRec(TopRegion)) |
| return false; |
| |
| if (TopRegion->getParent()) { |
| errs() << "VPlan Top Region should have no parent.\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| const VPBasicBlock *Entry = dyn_cast<VPBasicBlock>(TopRegion->getEntry()); |
| if (!Entry) { |
| errs() << "VPlan entry block is not a VPBasicBlock\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| if (!isa<VPCanonicalIVPHIRecipe>(&*Entry->begin())) { |
| errs() << "VPlan vector loop header does not start with a " |
| "VPCanonicalIVPHIRecipe\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| const VPBasicBlock *Exiting = dyn_cast<VPBasicBlock>(TopRegion->getExiting()); |
| if (!Exiting) { |
| errs() << "VPlan exiting block is not a VPBasicBlock\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| if (Exiting->empty()) { |
| errs() << "VPlan vector loop exiting block must end with BranchOnCount or " |
| "BranchOnCond VPInstruction but is empty\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| auto *LastInst = dyn_cast<VPInstruction>(std::prev(Exiting->end())); |
| if (!LastInst || (LastInst->getOpcode() != VPInstruction::BranchOnCount && |
| LastInst->getOpcode() != VPInstruction::BranchOnCond)) { |
| errs() << "VPlan vector loop exit must end with BranchOnCount or " |
| "BranchOnCond VPInstruction\n"; |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| bool llvm::verifyVPlanIsValid(const VPlan &Plan, bool VerifyLate) { |
| VPDominatorTree VPDT; |
| VPDT.recalculate(const_cast<VPlan &>(Plan)); |
| VPTypeAnalysis TypeInfo(Plan); |
| VPlanVerifier Verifier(VPDT, TypeInfo, VerifyLate); |
| return Verifier.verify(Plan); |
| } |