| /* A test for strength reduction and induction variable elimination. */ |
| |
| /* { dg-do compile } */ |
| /* { dg-options "-O1 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */ |
| /* LLVM LOCAL test not applicable */ |
| /* { dg-require-fdump "" } */ |
| /* { dg-require-effective-target size32plus } */ |
| |
| /* Size of this structure should be sufficiently weird so that no memory |
| addressing mode applies. */ |
| |
| struct bla |
| { |
| char x[187]; |
| int y; |
| char z[253]; |
| } arr_base[100]; |
| |
| int foo(void); |
| |
| void xxx(void) |
| { |
| int iter; |
| |
| for (iter = 0; iter < 100; iter++) |
| arr_base[iter].y = foo (); |
| } |
| |
| /* Access to arr_base[iter].y should be strength reduced. Depending on |
| whether we have an addressing mode of type [base + offset], one of the |
| following forms might get chosen: |
| |
| -- induction variable with base &arr_base[0].y, the memory access of |
| form *iv = ... |
| -- induction variable with base 0, the memory access of form |
| *(iv + &arr_base[0].y) = ... |
| |
| In any case, we should not have any multiplication. */ |
| |
| /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " \\* \[^\\n\\r\]*=" 0 "optimized" } } */ |
| /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\[^\\n\\r\]*= \\* " 0 "optimized" } } */ |
| /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MEM" 1 "optimized" } } */ |
| |
| /* And the original induction variable should be eliminated. */ |
| |
| /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "iter" 0 "optimized" } } */ |
| |
| /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */ |