tree e5853f134f4e9e6e2efe0989d21e519925004851
parent 507cee0654899e3573c428297ee06c2d19c7b99f
author Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com> 1553189031 +0000
committer Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com> 1553189031 +0000

[ValueTracking] Use ConstantRange based overflow check for signed sub

This is D59450, but for signed sub. This case is not NFC, because
the overflow logic in ConstantRange is more powerful than the existing
check. This resolves the TODO in the function.

I've added two tests to show that this indeed catches more cases than
the previous logic, but the main correctness test coverage here is in
the existing ConstantRange unit tests.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59617

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@356685 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8