blob: 8d79577f27178d3db0097f51af5cb405a3713f1c [file] [log] [blame]
# RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-- -o - %s -run-pass=none -verify-machineinstrs -simplify-mir | FileCheck %s
---
# We shouldn't need any explicit successor lists in these examples
# CHECK-LABEL: name: func0
# CHECK: bb.0:
# CHECK-NOT: successors
# CHECK: JE_1 %bb.1, implicit undef $eflags
# CHECK: JMP_1 %bb.3
# CHECK: bb.1:
# CHECK-NOT: successors
# CHECK: bb.2:
# CHECK-NOT: successors
# CHECK: JE_1 %bb.1, implicit undef $eflags
# CHECK: bb.3:
# CHECK: RETQ undef $eax
name: func0
body: |
bb.0:
JE_1 %bb.1, implicit undef $eflags
JMP_1 %bb.3
bb.1:
bb.2:
JE_1 %bb.1, implicit undef $eflags
bb.3:
JE_1 %bb.4, implicit undef $eflags ; condjump+fallthrough to same block
bb.4:
RETQ undef $eax
...
---
# Some cases that need explicit successors:
# CHECK-LABEL: name: func1
name: func1
body: |
bb.0:
; CHECK: bb.0:
; CHECK: successors: %bb.3, %bb.1
successors: %bb.3, %bb.1 ; different order than operands
JE_1 %bb.1, implicit undef $eflags
JMP_1 %bb.3
bb.1:
; CHECK: bb.1:
; CHECK: successors: %bb.2, %bb.1
successors: %bb.2, %bb.1 ; different order (fallthrough variant)
JE_1 %bb.1, implicit undef $eflags
bb.2:
; CHECK: bb.2:
; CHECK: successors: %bb.1(0x60000000), %bb.3(0x20000000)
successors: %bb.1(3), %bb.3(1) ; branch probabilities not normalized
JE_1 %bb.1, implicit undef $eflags
bb.3:
; CHECK: bb.3:
; CHECK: RETQ undef $eax
RETQ undef $eax
...