)]}'
{
  "commit": "fd402bb2dff58dd41a478ca4ca899e6bbfa87cd7",
  "tree": "8232a1e40b61a9e82ecdb99c4c1be64e1fb1d93c",
  "parents": [
    "99d63c64f8e8e63068ebfd2b1f792f6abfae7fed"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Teresa Johnson",
    "email": "tejohnson@google.com",
    "time": "Fri Dec 19 08:24:59 2025 -0800"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "GitHub",
    "email": "noreply@github.com",
    "time": "Fri Dec 19 08:24:59 2025 -0800"
  },
  "message": "[MemProf] Fix callee guid for non-leaf frame (#172502)\n\nWhen matching callsite profile info, we synthesize VP metadata for\nmatched indirect calls from the CalleeGuids recorded with the CallSite\nprofile info. However, those are the callee guids of the leaf-most frame\nin the callsite. In cases where we match to a portion of the frames, not\nincluding the leaf, the callee guid should instead be synthesized from\nthe next leaf-most frame in the list.\n\nThis addresses the case where indirect call promotion was applied in the\nprofiled binary during SamplePGO matching in a ThinLTO backend, where we\ndidn\u0027t have VP metadata.",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "5cde52637248aaa0452b164a6f865686a634e4ea",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/MemProfUse.cpp",
      "new_id": "1a55021c5d3f7f5ae729af3c69e61a9bc0ea5bd9",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/MemProfUse.cpp"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "15a315543056ac7e626631aa2195d35e802684ea",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "llvm/test/Transforms/PGOProfile/memprof_annotate_indirect_call.test",
      "new_id": "4677eebff3cfea6d2801165e16c7221802c2f64d",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "llvm/test/Transforms/PGOProfile/memprof_annotate_indirect_call.test"
    }
  ]
}
