[SLP] Pessimistically handle unknown vector entries in SLP vectorizer (#75438)

SLP Vectorizer can discard vector entries at unknown positions. This
example shows the behaviour:

https://godbolt.org/z/or43EM594

The following instruction inserts an element at an unknown position:

```
%2 = insertelement <3 x i64> poison, i64 %value, i64 %position
```

The position depends on an argument that is unknown at compile time.

After running SLP, one can see there is no more instruction present
referencing `%position`.

This happens as SLP parallelizes the two adds in the example. It then
needs to merge the original vector with the new vector.

Within `isUndefVector`, the SLP vectorizer constructs a bitmap
indicating which elements of the original vector are poison values. It
does this by walking the insertElement instructions.

If it encounters an insert with a non-constant position, it is ignored.
This will result in poison values to be used for all entries, where
there are no inserts with constant positions.

However, as the position is unknown, the element could be anywhere.
Therefore, I think it is only safe to assume none of the entries are
poison values and to simply take them all over when constructing the
shuffleVector instruction.

This fixes #75437