Passes represent the basic infrastructure for transformation and optimization. This document provides an overview of the pass infrastructure in MLIR and how to use it.
See MLIR specification for more information about MLIR and its core aspects, such as the IR structure and operations.
See MLIR Rewrites for a quick start on graph rewriting in MLIR. If a transformation involves pattern matching operation DAGs, this is a great place to start.
In MLIR, the main unit of abstraction and transformation is an operation. As such, the pass manager is designed to work on instances of operations at different levels of nesting. The structure of the pass manager, and the concept of nesting, is detailed further below. All passes in MLIR derive from OperationPass and adhere to the following restrictions; any noncompliance will lead to problematic behavior in multithreaded and other advanced scenarios:
runOnOperation. A pass may be run on many different operations with no guarantee of execution order.When creating an operation pass, there are two different types to choose from depending on the usage scenario:
An op-specific operation pass operates explicitly on a given operation type. This operation type must adhere to the restrictions set by the pass manager for pass execution.
To define an op-specific operation pass, a derived class must adhere to the following:
OperationPass and provide the operation type as an additional template parameter.void runOnOperation() method.A simple pass may look like:
namespace { /// Here we utilize the CRTP `PassWrapper` utility class to provide some /// necessary utility hooks. This is only necessary for passes defined directly /// in C++. Passes defined declaratively use a cleaner mechanism for providing /// these utilities. struct MyFunctionPass : public PassWrapper<MyFunctionPass, OperationPass<FuncOp>> { void runOnOperation() override { // Get the current FuncOp operation being operated on. FuncOp f = getOperation(); // Walk the operations within the function. f.walk([](Operation *inst) { .... }); } }; } // end anonymous namespace /// Register this pass so that it can be built via from a textual pass pipeline. /// (Pass registration is discussed more below) void registerMyPass() { PassRegistration<MyFunctionPass>(); }
An op-agnostic pass operates on the operation type of the pass manager that it is added to. This means that passes of this type may operate on several different operation types. Passes of this type are generally written generically using operation interfaces and traits. Examples of this type of pass are Common Sub-Expression Elimination and Inlining.
To create an operation pass, a derived class must adhere to the following:
OperationPass.void runOnOperation() method.A simple pass may look like:
/// Here we utilize the CRTP `PassWrapper` utility class to provide some /// necessary utility hooks. This is only necessary for passes defined directly /// in C++. Passes defined declaratively use a cleaner mechanism for providing /// these utilities. struct MyOperationPass : public PassWrapper<MyOperationPass, OperationPass<>> { void runOnOperation() override { // Get the current operation being operated on. Operation *op = getOperation(); ... } };
Dialects must be loaded in the MLIRContext before entities from these dialects (operations, types, attributes, ...) can be created. Dialects must also be loaded before starting the execution of a multi-threaded pass pipeline. To this end, a pass that may create an entity from a dialect that isn't guaranteed to already ne loaded must express this by overriding the getDependentDialects() method and declare this list of Dialects explicitly.
In certain situations, a Pass may contain state that is constructed dynamically, but is potentially expensive to recompute in successive runs of the Pass. One such example is when using PDL-based patterns, which are compiled into a bytecode during runtime. In these situations, a pass may override the following hook to initialize this heavy state:
LogicalResult initialize(MLIRContext *context)This hook is executed once per run of a full pass pipeline, meaning that it does not have access to the state available during a runOnOperation call. More concretely, all necessary accesses to an MLIRContext should be driven via the provided context parameter, and methods that utilize “per-run” state such as getContext/getOperation/getAnalysis/etc. must not be used. In case of an error during initialization, the pass is expected to emit an error diagnostic and return a failure() which will abort the pass pipeline execution.
An important concept, along with transformation passes, are analyses. These are conceptually similar to transformation passes, except that they compute information on a specific operation without modifying it. In MLIR, analyses are not passes but free-standing classes that are computed lazily on-demand and cached to avoid unnecessary recomputation. An analysis in MLIR must adhere to the following:
Operation* or Operation* and AnalysisManager &.AnalysisManager & should be used to query any necessary analysis dependencies.An analysis may provide additional hooks to control various behavior:
bool isInvalidated(const AnalysisManager::PreservedAnalyses &)Given a preserved analysis set, the analysis returns true if it should truly be invalidated. This allows for more fine-tuned invalidation in cases where an analysis wasn't explicitly marked preserved, but may be preserved (or invalidated) based upon other properties such as analyses sets. If the analysis uses any other analysis as a dependency, it must also check if the dependency was invalidated.
The base OperationPass class provides utilities for querying and preserving analyses for the current operation being processed.
getAnalysis<>getCachedAnalysis<>getCachedParentAnalysis<>getCachedChildAnalysis<>getChildAnalysis<>Using the example passes defined above, let's see some examples:
/// An interesting analysis. struct MyOperationAnalysis { // Compute this analysis with the provided operation. MyOperationAnalysis(Operation *op); }; struct MyOperationAnalysisWithDependency { MyOperationAnalysisWithDependency(Operation *op, AnalysisManager &am) { // Request other analysis as dependency MyOperationAnalysis &otherAnalysis = am.getAnalysis<MyOperationAnalysis>(); ... } bool isInvalidated(const AnalysisManager::PreservedAnalyses &pa) { // Check if analysis or its dependency were invalidated return !pa.isPreserved<MyOperationAnalysisWithDependency>() || !pa.isPreserved<MyOperationAnalysis>(); } }; void MyOperationPass::runOnOperation() { // Query MyOperationAnalysis for the current operation. MyOperationAnalysis &myAnalysis = getAnalysis<MyOperationAnalysis>(); // Query a cached instance of MyOperationAnalysis for the current operation. // It will not be computed if it doesn't exist. auto optionalAnalysis = getCachedAnalysis<MyOperationAnalysis>(); if (optionalAnalysis) ... // Query a cached instance of MyOperationAnalysis for the parent operation of // the current operation. It will not be computed if it doesn't exist. auto optionalAnalysis = getCachedParentAnalysis<MyOperationAnalysis>(); if (optionalAnalysis) ... }
Analyses that are constructed after being queried by a pass are cached to avoid unnecessary computation if they are requested again later. To avoid stale analyses, all analyses are assumed to be invalidated by a pass. To avoid invalidation, a pass must specifically mark analyses that are known to be preserved.
markAllAnalysesPreservedmarkAnalysesPreserved<>void MyOperationPass::runOnOperation() { // Mark all analyses as preserved. This is useful if a pass can guarantee // that no transformation was performed. markAllAnalysesPreserved(); // Mark specific analyses as preserved. This is used if some transformation // was performed, but some analyses were either unaffected or explicitly // preserved. markAnalysesPreserved<MyAnalysis, MyAnalyses...>(); }
Passes in MLIR are allowed to gracefully fail. This may happen if some invariant of the pass was broken, potentially leaving the IR in some invalid state. If such a situation occurs, the pass can directly signal a failure to the pass manager via the signalPassFailure method. If a pass signaled a failure when executing, no other passes in the pipeline will execute and the top-level call to PassManager::run will return failure.
void MyOperationPass::runOnOperation() { // Signal failure on a broken invariant. if (some_broken_invariant) return signalPassFailure(); }
The above sections introduced the different types of passes and their invariants. This section introduces the concept of a PassManager, and how it can be used to configure and schedule a pass pipeline. There are two main classes related to pass management, the PassManager and the OpPassManager. The PassManager class acts as the top-level entry point, and contains various configurations used for the entire pass pipeline. The OpPassManager class is used to schedule passes to run at a specific level of nesting. The top-level PassManager also functions as an OpPassManager.
An OpPassManager is essentially a collection of passes to execute on an operation of a specific type. This operation type must adhere to the following requirement:
Must be registered and marked IsolatedFromAbove.
Passes can be added to a pass manager via addPass. The pass must either be an op-specific pass operating on the same operation type as OpPassManager, or an op-agnostic pass.
An OpPassManager is generally created by explicitly nesting a pipeline within another existing OpPassManager via the nest<> method. This method takes the operation type that the nested pass manager will operate on. At the top-level, a PassManager acts as an OpPassManager. Nesting in this sense, corresponds to the structural nesting within Regions of the IR.
For example, the following .mlir:
module {
spv.module "Logical" "GLSL450" {
func @foo() {
...
}
}
}
Has the nesting structure of:
`module`
`spv.module`
`function`
Below is an example of constructing a pipeline that operates on the above structure:
// Create a top-level `PassManager` class. If an operation type is not // explicitly specific, the default is the builtin `module` operation. PassManager pm(ctx); // Note: We could also create the above `PassManager` this way. PassManager pm(ctx, /*operationName=*/"builtin.module"); // Add a pass on the top-level module operation. pm.addPass(std::make_unique<MyModulePass>()); // Nest a pass manager that operates on `spirv.module` operations nested // directly under the top-level module. OpPassManager &nestedModulePM = pm.nest<spirv::ModuleOp>(); nestedModulePM.addPass(std::make_unique<MySPIRVModulePass>()); // Nest a pass manager that operates on functions within the nested SPIRV // module. OpPassManager &nestedFunctionPM = nestedModulePM.nest<FuncOp>(); nestedFunctionPM.addPass(std::make_unique<MyFunctionPass>()); // Run the pass manager on the top-level module. ModuleOp m = ...; if (failed(pm.run(m))) ... // One of the passes signaled a failure.
The above pass manager contains the following pipeline structure:
OpPassManager<ModuleOp>
MyModulePass
OpPassManager<spirv::ModuleOp>
MySPIRVModulePass
OpPassManager<FuncOp>
MyFunctionPass
These pipelines are then run over a single operation at a time. This means that, for example, given a series of consecutive passes on FuncOp, it will execute all on the first function, then all on the second function, etc. until the entire program has been run through the passes. This provides several benefits:
In some situations it may be useful to run a pass pipeline within another pass, to allow configuring or filtering based on some invariants of the current operation being operated on. For example, the Inliner Pass may want to run intraprocedural simplification passes while it is inlining to produce a better cost model, and provide more optimal inlining. To enable this, passes may run an arbitrary OpPassManager on the current operation being operated on or any operation nested within the current operation via the LogicalResult Pass::runPipeline(OpPassManager &, Operation *) method. This method returns whether the dynamic pipeline succeeded or failed, similarly to the result of the top-level PassManager::run method. A simple example is shown below:
void MyModulePass::runOnOperation() { ModuleOp module = getOperation(); if (hasSomeSpecificProperty(module)) { OpPassManager dynamicPM("builtin.module"); ...; // Build the dynamic pipeline. if (failed(runPipeline(dynamicPM, module))) return signalPassFailure(); } }
Note: though above the dynamic pipeline was constructed within the runOnOperation method, this is not necessary and pipelines should be cached when possible as the OpPassManager class can be safely copy constructed.
The mechanism described in this section should be used whenever a pass pipeline should run in a nested fashion, i.e. when the nested pipeline cannot be scheduled statically along with the rest of the main pass pipeline. More specifically, a PassManager should generally never need to be constructed within a Pass. Using runPipeline also ensures that all analyses, instrumentations, and other pass manager related components are integrated with the dynamic pipeline being executed.
MLIR provides a builtin mechanism for passes to specify options that configure its behavior. These options are parsed at pass construction time independently for each instance of the pass. Options are defined using the Option<> and ListOption<> classes, and follow the LLVM command line flag definition rules. See below for a few examples:
struct MyPass ... { /// Make sure that we have a valid default constructor and copy constructor to /// ensure that the options are initialized properly. MyPass() = default; MyPass(const MyPass& pass) {} /// Any parameters after the description are forwarded to llvm::cl::list and /// llvm::cl::opt respectively. Option<int> exampleOption{*this, "flag-name", llvm::cl::desc("...")}; ListOption<int> exampleListOption{*this, "list-flag-name", llvm::cl::desc("...")}; };
For pass pipelines, the PassPipelineRegistration templates take an additional template parameter for an optional Option struct definition. This struct should inherit from mlir::PassPipelineOptions and contain the desired pipeline options. When using PassPipelineRegistration, the constructor now takes a function with the signature void (OpPassManager &pm, const MyPipelineOptions&) which should construct the passes from the options and pass them to the pm:
struct MyPipelineOptions : public PassPipelineOptions { // The structure of these options is the same as those for pass options. Option<int> exampleOption{*this, "flag-name", llvm::cl::desc("...")}; ListOption<int> exampleListOption{*this, "list-flag-name", llvm::cl::desc("...")}; }; void registerMyPasses() { PassPipelineRegistration<MyPipelineOptions>( "example-pipeline", "Run an example pipeline.", [](OpPassManager &pm, const MyPipelineOptions &pipelineOptions) { // Initialize the pass manager. }); }
Statistics are a way to keep track of what the compiler is doing and how effective various transformations are. It is often useful to see what effect specific transformations have on a particular input, and how often they trigger. Pass statistics are specific to each pass instance, which allow for seeing the effect of placing a particular transformation at specific places within the pass pipeline. For example, they help answer questions like “What happens if I run CSE again here?”.
Statistics can be added to a pass by using the ‘Pass::Statistic’ class. This class takes as a constructor arguments: the parent pass, a name, and a description. This class acts like an atomic unsigned integer, and may be incremented and updated accordingly. These statistics rely on the same infrastructure as llvm::Statistic and thus have similar usage constraints. Collected statistics can be dumped by the pass manager programmatically via PassManager::enableStatistics; or via -pass-statistics and -pass-statistics-display on the command line.
An example is shown below:
struct MyPass ... { /// Make sure that we have a valid default constructor and copy constructor to /// ensure that the options are initialized properly. MyPass() = default; MyPass(const MyPass& pass) {} StringRef getArgument() const final { // This is the argument used to refer to the pass in // the textual format (on the commandline for example). return "argument"; } StringRef getDescription() const final { // This is a brief description of the pass. return "description"; } /// Define the statistic to track during the execution of MyPass. Statistic exampleStat{this, "exampleStat", "An example statistic"}; void runOnOperation() { ... // Update the statistic after some invariant was hit. ++exampleStat; ... } };
The collected statistics may be aggregated in two types of views:
A pipeline view that models the structure of the pass manager, this is the default view:
$ mlir-opt -pass-pipeline='builtin.func(my-pass,my-pass)' foo.mlir -pass-statistics ===-------------------------------------------------------------------------=== ... Pass statistics report ... ===-------------------------------------------------------------------------=== 'builtin.func' Pipeline MyPass (S) 15 exampleStat - An example statistic VerifierPass MyPass (S) 6 exampleStat - An example statistic VerifierPass VerifierPass
A list view that aggregates the statistics of all instances of a specific pass together:
$ mlir-opt -pass-pipeline='builtin.func(my-pass, my-pass)' foo.mlir -pass-statistics -pass-statistics-display=list ===-------------------------------------------------------------------------=== ... Pass statistics report ... ===-------------------------------------------------------------------------=== MyPass (S) 21 exampleStat - An example statistic
Briefly shown in the example definitions of the various pass types is the PassRegistration class. This mechanism allows for registering pass classes so that they may be created within a textual pass pipeline description. An example registration is shown below:
void registerMyPass() { PassRegistration<MyPass>(); }
MyPass is the name of the derived pass class.getArgument() method is used to get the identifier that will be used to refer to the pass.getDescription() method provides a short summary describing the pass.For passes that cannot be default-constructed, PassRegistration accepts an optional argument that takes a callback to create the pass:
void registerMyPass() { PassRegistration<MyParametricPass>( []() -> std::unique_ptr<Pass> { std::unique_ptr<Pass> p = std::make_unique<MyParametricPass>(/*options*/); /*... non-trivial-logic to configure the pass ...*/; return p; }); }
This variant of registration can be used, for example, to accept the configuration of a pass from command-line arguments and pass it to the pass constructor.
Note: Make sure that the pass is copy-constructible in a way that does not share data as the pass manager may create copies of the pass to run in parallel.
Described above is the mechanism used for registering a specific derived pass class. On top of that, MLIR allows for registering custom pass pipelines in a similar fashion. This allows for custom pipelines to be available to tools like mlir-opt in the same way that passes are, which is useful for encapsulating common pipelines like the “-O1” series of passes. Pipelines are registered via a similar mechanism to passes in the form of PassPipelineRegistration. Compared to PassRegistration, this class takes an additional parameter in the form of a pipeline builder that modifies a provided OpPassManager.
void pipelineBuilder(OpPassManager &pm) { pm.addPass(std::make_unique<MyPass>()); pm.addPass(std::make_unique<MyOtherPass>()); } void registerMyPasses() { // Register an existing pipeline builder function. PassPipelineRegistration<>( "argument", "description", pipelineBuilder); // Register an inline pipeline builder. PassPipelineRegistration<>( "argument", "description", [](OpPassManager &pm) { pm.addPass(std::make_unique<MyPass>()); pm.addPass(std::make_unique<MyOtherPass>()); }); }
The previous sections detailed how to register passes and pass pipelines with a specific argument and description. Once registered, these can be used to configure a pass manager from a string description. This is especially useful for tools like mlir-opt, that configure pass managers from the command line, or as options to passes that utilize dynamic pass pipelines.
To support the ability to describe the full structure of pass pipelines, MLIR supports a custom textual description of pass pipelines. The textual description includes the nesting structure, the arguments of the passes and pass pipelines to run, and any options for those passes and pipelines. A textual pipeline is defined as a series of names, each of which may in itself recursively contain a nested pipeline description. The syntax for this specification is as follows:
pipeline ::= op-name `(` pipeline-element (`,` pipeline-element)* `)` pipeline-element ::= pipeline | (pass-name | pass-pipeline-name) options? options ::= '{' (key ('=' value)?)+ '}'
op-namebuiltin.func or builtin.module.pass-name | pass-pipeline-namecse or canonicalize.optionsFor example, the following pipeline:
$ mlir-opt foo.mlir -cse -canonicalize -convert-std-to-llvm='use-bare-ptr-memref-call-conv=1'
Can also be specified as (via the -pass-pipeline flag):
$ mlir-opt foo.mlir -pass-pipeline='builtin.func(cse,canonicalize),convert-std-to-llvm{use-bare-ptr-memref-call-conv=1}'
In order to support round-tripping a pass to the textual representation using OpPassManager::printAsTextualPipeline(raw_ostream&), override StringRef Pass::getArgument() to specify the argument used when registering a pass.
Some aspects of a Pass may be specified declaratively, in a form similar to operations. This specification simplifies several mechanisms used when defining passes. It can be used for generating pass registration calls, defining boilerplate pass utilities, and generating pass documentation.
Consider the following pass specified in C++:
struct MyPass : PassWrapper<MyPass, OperationPass<ModuleOp>> { MyPass() = default; MyPass(const MyPass &) {} ... // Specify any options. Option<bool> option{ *this, "example-option", llvm::cl::desc("An example option"), llvm::cl::init(true)}; ListOption<int64_t> listOption{ *this, "example-list", llvm::cl::desc("An example list option"), llvm::cl::ZeroOrMore, llvm::cl::MiscFlags::CommaSeparated}; // Specify any statistics. Statistic statistic{this, "example-statistic", "An example statistic"}; }; /// Expose this pass to the outside world. std::unique_ptr<Pass> foo::createMyPass() { return std::make_unique<MyPass>(); } /// Register this pass. void foo::registerMyPass() { PassRegistration<MyPass>(); }
This pass may be specified declaratively as so:
def MyPass : Pass<"my-pass", "ModuleOp"> { let summary = "My Pass Summary"; let description = [{ Here we can now give a much larger description of `MyPass`, including all of its various constraints and behavior. }]; // A constructor must be provided to specify how to create a default instance // of MyPass. let constructor = "foo::createMyPass()"; // Specify any options. let options = [ Option<"option", "example-option", "bool", /*default=*/"true", "An example option">, ListOption<"listOption", "example-list", "int64_t", "An example list option", "llvm::cl::ZeroOrMore, llvm::cl::MiscFlags::CommaSeparated"> ]; // Specify any statistics. let statistics = [ Statistic<"statistic", "example-statistic", "An example statistic"> ]; }
Using the gen-pass-decls generator, we can generate most of the boilerplate above automatically. This generator takes as an input a -name parameter, that provides a tag for the group of passes that are being generated. This generator produces two chunks of output:
The first is a code block for registering the declarative passes with the global registry. For each pass, the generator produces a registerFooPass where Foo is the name of the definition specified in tablegen. It also generates a registerGroupPasses, where Group is the tag provided via the -name input parameter, that registers all of the passes present.
// gen-pass-decls -name="Example" #define GEN_PASS_REGISTRATION #include "Passes.h.inc" void registerMyPasses() { // Register all of the passes. registerExamplePasses(); // Register `MyPass` specifically. registerMyPassPass(); }
The second is a base class for each of the passes, containing most of the boiler plate related to pass definitions. These classes are named in the form of MyPassBase, where MyPass is the name of the pass definition in tablegen. We can update the original C++ pass definition as so:
/// Include the generated base pass class definitions. #define GEN_PASS_CLASSES #include "Passes.h.inc" /// Define the main class as deriving from the generated base class. struct MyPass : MyPassBase<MyPass> { /// The explicit constructor is no longer explicitly necessary when defining /// pass options and statistics, the base class takes care of that /// automatically. ... /// The definitions of the options and statistics are now generated within /// the base class, but are accessible in the same way. }; /// Expose this pass to the outside world. std::unique_ptr<Pass> foo::createMyPass() { return std::make_unique<MyPass>(); }
Using the gen-pass-doc generator, markdown documentation for each of the passes can be generated. See Passes.md for example output of real MLIR passes.
The Pass class is used to begin a new pass definition. This class takes as an argument the registry argument to attribute to the pass, as well as an optional string corresponding to the operation type that the pass operates on. The class contains the following fields:
summarydescriptiondependentDialectsDialect classes this pass may introduce entities, Attributes/Operations/Types/etc., of.constructoroptionsstatisticsOptions may be specified via the Option and ListOption classes. The Option class takes the following template parameters:
def MyPass : Pass<"my-pass"> { let options = [ Option<"option", "example-option", "bool", /*default=*/"true", "An example option">, ]; }
The ListOption class takes the following fields:
def MyPass : Pass<"my-pass"> { let options = [ ListOption<"listOption", "example-list", "int64_t", "An example list option", "llvm::cl::ZeroOrMore, llvm::cl::MiscFlags::CommaSeparated"> ]; }
Statistics may be specified via the Statistic, which takes the following template parameters:
def MyPass : Pass<"my-pass"> { let statistics = [ Statistic<"statistic", "example-statistic", "An example statistic"> ]; }
MLIR provides a customizable framework to instrument pass execution and analysis computation, via the PassInstrumentation class. This class provides hooks into the PassManager that observe various events:
runBeforePipelinerunAfterPipelinerunBeforePassrunAfterPassrunAfterPassFailed will not be.runAfterPassFailedrunAfterPass will not be.runBeforeAnalysisrunBeforeAnalysis/runAfterAnalysis pair for the dependency can be called from inside of the current runBeforeAnalysis/runAfterAnalysis pair.runAfterAnalysisPassInstrumentation instances may be registered directly with a PassManager instance via the addInstrumentation method. Instrumentations added to the PassManager are run in a stack like fashion, i.e. the last instrumentation to execute a runBefore* hook will be the first to execute the respective runAfter* hook. The hooks of a PassInstrumentation class are guaranteed to be executed in a thread safe fashion, so additional synchronization is not necessary. Below in an example instrumentation that counts the number of times the DominanceInfo analysis is computed:
struct DominanceCounterInstrumentation : public PassInstrumentation { /// The cumulative count of how many times dominance has been calculated. unsigned &count; DominanceCounterInstrumentation(unsigned &count) : count(count) {} void runAfterAnalysis(llvm::StringRef, TypeID id, Operation *) override { if (id == TypeID::get<DominanceInfo>()) ++count; } }; MLIRContext *ctx = ...; PassManager pm(ctx); // Add the instrumentation to the pass manager. unsigned domInfoCount; pm.addInstrumentation( std::make_unique<DominanceCounterInstrumentation>(domInfoCount)); // Run the pass manager on a module operation. ModuleOp m = ...; if (failed(pm.run(m))) ... llvm::errs() << "DominanceInfo was computed " << domInfoCount << " times!\n";
MLIR utilizes the pass instrumentation framework to provide a few useful developer tools and utilities. Each of these instrumentations are directly available to all users of the MLIR pass framework.
The PassTiming instrumentation provides timing information about the execution of passes and computation of analyses. This provides a quick glimpse into what passes are taking the most time to execute, as well as how much of an effect a pass has on the total execution time of the pipeline. Users can enable this instrumentation directly on the PassManager via enableTiming. This instrumentation is also made available in mlir-opt via the -mlir-timing flag. The PassTiming instrumentation provides several different display modes for the timing results, each of which is described below:
In this mode, the results are displayed in a list sorted by total time with each pass/analysis instance aggregated into one unique result. This view is useful for getting an overview of what analyses/passes are taking the most time in a pipeline. This display mode is available in mlir-opt via -mlir-timing-display=list.
$ mlir-opt foo.mlir -mlir-disable-threading -pass-pipeline='builtin.func(cse,canonicalize)' -convert-std-to-llvm -mlir-timing -mlir-timing-display=list ===-------------------------------------------------------------------------=== ... Pass execution timing report ... ===-------------------------------------------------------------------------=== Total Execution Time: 0.0203 seconds ---Wall Time--- --- Name --- 0.0047 ( 55.9%) Canonicalizer 0.0019 ( 22.2%) VerifierPass 0.0016 ( 18.5%) LLVMLoweringPass 0.0003 ( 3.4%) CSE 0.0002 ( 1.9%) (A) DominanceInfo 0.0084 (100.0%) Total
In this mode, the results are displayed in a nested pipeline view that mirrors the internal pass pipeline that is being executed in the pass manager. This view is useful for understanding specifically which parts of the pipeline are taking the most time, and can also be used to identify when analyses are being invalidated and recomputed. This is the default display mode.
$ mlir-opt foo.mlir -mlir-disable-threading -pass-pipeline='builtin.func(cse,canonicalize)' -convert-std-to-llvm -mlir-timing ===-------------------------------------------------------------------------=== ... Pass execution timing report ... ===-------------------------------------------------------------------------=== Total Execution Time: 0.0249 seconds ---Wall Time--- --- Name --- 0.0058 ( 70.8%) 'builtin.func' Pipeline 0.0004 ( 4.3%) CSE 0.0002 ( 2.6%) (A) DominanceInfo 0.0004 ( 4.8%) VerifierPass 0.0046 ( 55.4%) Canonicalizer 0.0005 ( 6.2%) VerifierPass 0.0005 ( 5.8%) VerifierPass 0.0014 ( 17.2%) LLVMLoweringPass 0.0005 ( 6.2%) VerifierPass 0.0082 (100.0%) Total
When multi-threading is enabled in the pass manager the meaning of the display slightly changes. First, a new timing column is added, User Time, that displays the total time spent across all threads. Secondly, the Wall Time column displays the longest individual time spent amongst all of the threads. This means that the Wall Time column will continue to give an indicator on the perceived time, or clock time, whereas the User Time will display the total cpu time.
$ mlir-opt foo.mlir -pass-pipeline='builtin.func(cse,canonicalize)' -convert-std-to-llvm -mlir-timing ===-------------------------------------------------------------------------=== ... Pass execution timing report ... ===-------------------------------------------------------------------------=== Total Execution Time: 0.0078 seconds ---User Time--- ---Wall Time--- --- Name --- 0.0177 ( 88.5%) 0.0057 ( 71.3%) 'builtin.func' Pipeline 0.0044 ( 22.0%) 0.0015 ( 18.9%) CSE 0.0029 ( 14.5%) 0.0012 ( 15.2%) (A) DominanceInfo 0.0038 ( 18.9%) 0.0015 ( 18.7%) VerifierPass 0.0089 ( 44.6%) 0.0025 ( 31.1%) Canonicalizer 0.0006 ( 3.0%) 0.0002 ( 2.6%) VerifierPass 0.0004 ( 2.2%) 0.0004 ( 5.4%) VerifierPass 0.0013 ( 6.5%) 0.0013 ( 16.3%) LLVMLoweringPass 0.0006 ( 2.8%) 0.0006 ( 7.0%) VerifierPass 0.0200 (100.0%) 0.0081 (100.0%) Total
When debugging it is often useful to dump the IR at various stages of a pass pipeline. This is where the IR printing instrumentation comes into play. This instrumentation allows for conditionally printing the IR before and after pass execution by optionally filtering on the pass being executed. This instrumentation can be added directly to the PassManager via the enableIRPrinting method. mlir-opt provides a few useful flags for utilizing this instrumentation:
print-ir-before=(comma-separated-pass-list)print-ir-before-all$ mlir-opt foo.mlir -pass-pipeline='builtin.func(cse)' -print-ir-before=cse *** IR Dump Before CSE *** func @simple_constant() -> (i32, i32) { %c1_i32 = arith.constant 1 : i32 %c1_i32_0 = arith.constant 1 : i32 return %c1_i32, %c1_i32_0 : i32, i32 }
print-ir-after=(comma-separated-pass-list)print-ir-after-all$ mlir-opt foo.mlir -pass-pipeline='builtin.func(cse)' -print-ir-after=cse *** IR Dump After CSE *** func @simple_constant() -> (i32, i32) { %c1_i32 = arith.constant 1 : i32 return %c1_i32, %c1_i32 : i32, i32 }
print-ir-after-change$ mlir-opt foo.mlir -pass-pipeline='builtin.func(cse,cse)' -print-ir-after=cse -print-ir-after-change *** IR Dump After CSE *** func @simple_constant() -> (i32, i32) { %c1_i32 = arith.constant 1 : i32 return %c1_i32, %c1_i32 : i32, i32 }
print-ir-after-failureprint-ir-after flags above.$ mlir-opt foo.mlir -pass-pipeline='builtin.func(cse,bad-pass)' -print-ir-failure *** IR Dump After BadPass Failed *** func @simple_constant() -> (i32, i32) { %c1_i32 = arith.constant 1 : i32 return %c1_i32, %c1_i32 : i32, i32 }
print-ir-module-scope-mlir-disable-threading)$ mlir-opt foo.mlir -mlir-disable-threading -pass-pipeline='builtin.func(cse)' -print-ir-after=cse -print-ir-module-scope *** IR Dump After CSE *** ('builtin.func' operation: @bar) func @bar(%arg0: f32, %arg1: f32) -> f32 { ... } func @simple_constant() -> (i32, i32) { %c1_i32 = arith.constant 1 : i32 %c1_i32_0 = arith.constant 1 : i32 return %c1_i32, %c1_i32_0 : i32, i32 } *** IR Dump After CSE *** ('builtin.func' operation: @simple_constant) func @bar(%arg0: f32, %arg1: f32) -> f32 { ... } func @simple_constant() -> (i32, i32) { %c1_i32 = arith.constant 1 : i32 return %c1_i32, %c1_i32 : i32, i32 }
The pass manager in MLIR contains a builtin mechanism to generate reproducibles in the event of a crash, or a pass failure. This functionality can be enabled via PassManager::enableCrashReproducerGeneration or via the command line flag pass-pipeline-crash-reproducer. In either case, an argument is provided that corresponds to the output .mlir file name that the reproducible should be written to. The reproducible contains the configuration of the pass manager that was executing, as well as the initial IR before any passes were run. A potential reproducible may have the form:
// configuration: -pass-pipeline='builtin.func(cse,canonicalize),inline' -verify-each module { func @foo() { ... } }
The configuration dumped can be passed to mlir-opt by specifying -run-reproducer flag. This will result in parsing the first line configuration of the reproducer and adding those to the command line options.
Beyond specifying a filename, one can also register a ReproducerStreamFactory function that would be invoked in the case of a crash and the reproducer written to its stream.
An additional flag may be passed to PassManager::enableCrashReproducerGeneration, and specified via pass-pipeline-local-reproducer on the command line, that signals that the pass manager should attempt to generate a “local” reproducer. This will attempt to generate a reproducer containing IR right before the pass that fails. This is useful for situations where the crash is known to be within a specific pass, or when the original input relies on components (like dialects or passes) that may not always be available.
Note: Local reproducer generation requires that multi-threading is disabled(-mlir-disable-threading)
For example, if the failure in the previous example came from canonicalize, the following reproducer will be generated:
// configuration: -pass-pipeline='builtin.func(canonicalize)' -verify-each -mlir-disable-threading module { func @foo() { ... } }