Rewrite r228138 to be somewhat saner.
While probably technically correct, the solution r228138 was quite hard
to read/understand. This should be simpler.
Also added a test to ensure that we are still visiting the syntactic form
as well.
llvm-svn: 228144
diff --git a/clang/unittests/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchersTest.cpp b/clang/unittests/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchersTest.cpp
index 7325e06..6485803 100644
--- a/clang/unittests/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchersTest.cpp
+++ b/clang/unittests/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchersTest.cpp
@@ -3148,6 +3148,8 @@
"void f();"
"S s[1] = { &f };",
declRefExpr(to(functionDecl(hasName("f"))))));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(
+ matches("int i[1] = {42, [0] = 43};", integerLiteral(equals(42))));
}
TEST(UsingDeclaration, MatchesUsingDeclarations) {
