[Clang] Fix the assertion condition after b8d1f3d6 (#132669) Thanks to the example provided by MagentaTreehouse, I realized the assertion I added in b8d1f3d6 didn't cover all valid cases like, when inheriting from a class template specialization, the source of a synthesized template parameter might be an implicit specialization, whose inner function template is thus living at depth 0, for which we don’t want it to overflow too. I've decided to remove that assertion because I don't think it's particularly useful: we're checking whether Depth = 0 parameters come from function templates whose parents contribute no template parameters to the depth, which is redundant given what the template depth already means. This also incorporates a drive-by fix for https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132061#discussion_r2008756718, which I somehow missed.
Welcome to the LLVM project!
This repository contains the source code for LLVM, a toolkit for the construction of highly optimized compilers, optimizers, and run-time environments.
The LLVM project has multiple components. The core of the project is itself called “LLVM”. This contains all of the tools, libraries, and header files needed to process intermediate representations and convert them into object files. Tools include an assembler, disassembler, bitcode analyzer, and bitcode optimizer.
C-like languages use the Clang frontend. This component compiles C, C++, Objective-C, and Objective-C++ code into LLVM bitcode -- and from there into object files, using LLVM.
Other components include: the libc++ C++ standard library, the LLD linker, and more.
Consult the Getting Started with LLVM page for information on building and running LLVM.
For information on how to contribute to the LLVM project, please take a look at the Contributing to LLVM guide.
Join the LLVM Discourse forums, Discord chat, LLVM Office Hours or Regular sync-ups.
The LLVM project has adopted a code of conduct for participants to all modes of communication within the project.