commit 34ae2265e88c8a04350de5a244d0d888e74a8388
author Krystian Stasiowski <sdkrystian@gmail.com> Tue May 07 21:41:33 2024 -0400
committer GitHub <noreply@github.com> Tue May 07 21:41:33 2024 -0400
tree ce210841290cde80dd71aa91ceee3ec4e0766df3
parent 83f3b1cb480b41e3347035aff14fd4bc2ba21d24

[Clang][Sema] Improve support for explicit specializations of constrained member functions & member function templates (#88963)

Consider the following snippet from the discussion of CWG2847 on the core reflector:
```
template<typename T>
concept C = sizeof(T) <= sizeof(long);

template<typename T>
struct A 
{
    template<typename U>
    void f(U) requires C<U>; // #1, declares a function template 

    void g() requires C<T>; // #2, declares a function

    template<>
    void f(char);  // #3, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function
};

template<>
template<typename U>
void A<short>::f(U) requires C<U>; // #4, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function template

template<>
template<>
void A<int>::f(int); // #5, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function

template<>
void A<long>::g(); // #6, an explicit specialization of a function that declares a function
```

A number of problems exist:
- Clang rejects `#4` because the trailing _requires-clause_ has `U`
substituted with the wrong template parameter depth when
`Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is called to determine whether it
matches the trailing _requires-clause_ of the implicitly instantiated
function template.
- Clang rejects `#5` because the function template specialization
instantiated from `A<int>::f` has a trailing _requires-clause_, but `#5`
does not (nor can it have one as it isn't a templated function).
- Clang rejects `#6` for the same reasons it rejects `#5`.

This patch resolves these issues by making the following changes:
- To fix `#4`, `Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is passed
`FunctionTemplateDecl`s when comparing the trailing _requires-clauses_
of `#4` and the function template instantiated from `#1`.
- To fix `#5` and `#6`, the trailing _requires-clauses_ are not compared
for explicit specializations that declare functions.

In addition to these changes, `CheckMemberSpecialization` now considers
constraint satisfaction/constraint partial ordering when determining
which member function is specialized by an explicit specialization of a
member function for an implicit instantiation of a class template (we
previously would select the first function that has the same type as the
explicit specialization). With constraints taken under consideration, we
match EDG's behavior for these declarations.