| .. _phabricator-reviews: |
| |
| ============================= |
| Code Reviews with Phabricator |
| ============================= |
| |
| .. contents:: |
| :local: |
| |
| If you prefer to use a web user interface for code reviews, you can now submit |
| your patches for Clang and LLVM at `LLVM's Phabricator`_ instance. |
| |
| While Phabricator is a useful tool for some, the relevant -commits mailing list |
| is the system of record for all LLVM code review. The mailing list should be |
| added as a subscriber on all reviews, and Phabricator users should be prepared |
| to respond to free-form comments in mail sent to the commits list. |
| |
| Sign up |
| ------- |
| |
| To get started with Phabricator, navigate to `https://reviews.llvm.org`_ and |
| click the power icon in the top right. You can register with a GitHub account, |
| a Google account, or you can create your own profile. |
| |
| Make *sure* that the email address registered with Phabricator is subscribed |
| to the relevant -commits mailing list. If you are not subscribed to the commit |
| list, all mail sent by Phabricator on your behalf will be held for moderation. |
| |
| Note that if you use your git user name as Phabricator user name, |
| Phabricator will automatically connect your submits to your Phabricator user in |
| the `Code Repository Browser`_. |
| |
| Requesting a review via the command line |
| ---------------------------------------- |
| |
| Phabricator has a tool called *Arcanist* to upload patches from |
| the command line. To get you set up, follow the |
| `Arcanist Quick Start`_ instructions. |
| |
| You can learn more about how to use arc to interact with |
| Phabricator in the `Arcanist User Guide`_. |
| The basic way of creating a revision for the current commit in your local |
| repository is to run: |
| |
| :: |
| |
| arc diff HEAD~ |
| |
| |
| Sometime you may want to create a draft revision to show the proof of concept |
| or for experimental purposes, In that case you can use the `--draft` option. It |
| will create a new draft revision. The good part is: it will not send mail to |
| llvm-commit mailing list, patch reviewers, and all other subscribers, buildbot |
| will also run on every patch update: |
| |
| :: |
| |
| arc diff --draft HEAD~ |
| |
| |
| If you later update your commit message, you need to add the `--verbatim` |
| option to have `arc` update the description on Phabricator: |
| |
| :: |
| |
| arc diff --edit --verbatim |
| |
| |
| .. _phabricator-request-review-web: |
| |
| Requesting a review via the web interface |
| ----------------------------------------- |
| |
| The tool to create and review patches in Phabricator is called |
| *Differential*. |
| |
| Note that you can upload patches created through git, but using `arc` on the |
| command line (see previous section) is preferred: it adds more metadata to |
| Phabricator which are useful for the pre-merge testing system and for |
| propagating attribution on commits when someone else has to push it for you. |
| |
| To make reviews easier, please always include **as much context as |
| possible** with your diff! Don't worry, Phabricator |
| will automatically send a diff with a smaller context in the review |
| email, but having the full file in the web interface will help the |
| reviewer understand your code. |
| |
| To get a full diff, use one of the following commands (or just use Arcanist |
| to upload your patch): |
| |
| * ``git show HEAD -U999999 > mypatch.patch`` |
| * ``git diff -U999999 @{u} > mypatch.patch`` |
| * ``git diff HEAD~1 -U999999 > mypatch.patch`` |
| |
| Before uploading your patch, please make sure it is formatted properly, as |
| described in :ref:`How to Submit a Patch <format patches>`. |
| |
| To upload a new patch: |
| |
| * Click *Differential*. |
| * Click *+ Create Diff*. |
| * Paste the text diff or browse to the patch file. Click *Create Diff*. |
| * Leave this first Repository field blank. (We'll fill in the Repository |
| later, when sending the review.) |
| * Leave the drop down on *Create a new Revision...* and click *Continue*. |
| * Enter a descriptive title and summary. The title and summary are usually |
| in the form of a :ref:`commit message <commit messages>`. |
| * Add reviewers (see below for advice). (If you set the Repository field |
| correctly, llvm-commits or cfe-commits will be subscribed automatically; |
| otherwise, you will have to manually subscribe them.) |
| * In the Repository field, enter "rG LLVM Github Monorepo". |
| * Click *Save*. |
| |
| To submit an updated patch: |
| |
| * Click *Differential*. |
| * Click *+ Create Diff*. |
| * Paste the updated diff or browse to the updated patch file. Click *Create Diff*. |
| * Select the review you want to from the *Attach To* dropdown and click |
| *Continue*. |
| * Leave the Repository field blank. (We previously filled out the Repository |
| for the review request.) |
| * Add comments about the changes in the new diff. Click *Save*. |
| |
| Choosing reviewers: You typically pick one or two people as initial reviewers. |
| This choice is not crucial, because you are merely suggesting and not requiring |
| them to participate. Many people will see the email notification on cfe-commits |
| or llvm-commits, and if the subject line suggests the patch is something they |
| should look at, they will. |
| |
| |
| .. _finding-potential-reviewers: |
| |
| Finding potential reviewers |
| --------------------------- |
| |
| Here are a couple of ways to pick the initial reviewer(s): |
| |
| * Use ``git blame`` and the commit log to find names of people who have |
| recently modified the same area of code that you are modifying. |
| * Look in CODE_OWNERS.TXT to see who might be responsible for that area. |
| * If you've discussed the change on a dev list, the people who participated |
| might be appropriate reviewers. |
| |
| Even if you think the code owner is the busiest person in the world, it's still |
| okay to put them as a reviewer. Being the code owner means they have accepted |
| responsibility for making sure the review happens. |
| |
| Reviewing code with Phabricator |
| ------------------------------- |
| |
| Phabricator allows you to add inline comments as well as overall comments |
| to a revision. To add an inline comment, select the lines of code you want |
| to comment on by clicking and dragging the line numbers in the diff pane. |
| When you have added all your comments, scroll to the bottom of the page and |
| click the Submit button. |
| |
| You can add overall comments in the text box at the bottom of the page. |
| When you're done, click the Submit button. |
| |
| Phabricator has many useful features, for example allowing you to select |
| diffs between different versions of the patch as it was reviewed in the |
| *Revision Update History*. Most features are self descriptive - explore, and |
| if you have a question, drop by on #llvm in IRC to get help. |
| |
| Note that as e-mail is the system of reference for code reviews, and some |
| people prefer it over a web interface, we do not generate automated mail |
| when a review changes state, for example by clicking "Accept Revision" in |
| the web interface. Thus, please type LGTM into the comment box to accept |
| a change from Phabricator. |
| |
| .. _pre-merge-testing: |
| |
| Pre-merge testing |
| ----------------- |
| |
| The pre-merge tests are a continuous integration (CI) workflow. The workflow |
| checks the patches uploaded to Phabricator before a user merges them to the main |
| branch - thus the term *pre-merge testing*. |
| |
| When a user uploads a patch to Phabricator, Phabricator triggers the checks and |
| then displays the results. This way bugs in a patch are contained during the |
| code review stage and do not pollute the main branch. |
| |
| Our goal with pre-merge testing is to report most true problems while strongly |
| minimizing the number of false positive reports. Our goal is that problems |
| reported are always actionable. If you notice a false positive, please report |
| it so that we can identify the cause. |
| |
| If you notice issues or have an idea on how to improve pre-merge checks, please |
| `create a new issue <https://github.com/google/llvm-premerge-checks/issues/new>`_ |
| or give a ❤️ to an existing one. |
| |
| Requirements |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| |
| To get a patch on Phabricator tested, the build server must be able to apply the |
| patch to the checked out git repository. Please make sure that either: |
| |
| * You set a git hash as ``sourceControlBaseRevision`` in Phabricator which is |
| available on the GitHub repository, |
| * **or** you define the dependencies of your patch in Phabricator, |
| * **or** your patch can be applied to the main branch. |
| |
| Only then can the build server apply the patch locally and run the builds and |
| tests. |
| |
| Accessing build results |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| Phabricator will automatically trigger a build for every new patch you upload or |
| modify. Phabricator shows the build results at the top of the entry. Clicking on |
| the links (in the red box) will show more details: |
| |
| .. image:: Phabricator_premerge_results.png |
| |
| The CI will compile and run tests, run clang-format and clang-tidy on lines |
| changed. |
| |
| If a unit test failed, this is shown below the build status. You can also expand |
| the unit test to see the details: |
| |
| .. image:: Phabricator_premerge_unit_tests.png |
| |
| Opting Out |
| ^^^^^^^^^^ |
| |
| In case you want to opt-out entirely of pre-merge testing, add yourself to the |
| `OPT OUT project <https://reviews.llvm.org/project/view/83/>`_. If you decide |
| to opt-out, please let us know why, so we might be able to improve in the future. |
| |
| Operational Details |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| |
| The code responsible for running the pre-merge flow can be found in the `external |
| repository <https://github.com/google/llvm-premerge-checks>`_. For enhancement |
| ideas and most bugs, please file an issue on said repository. For immediate |
| operational problems, the point of contact is |
| `Mikhail Goncharov <mailto:goncharo@google.com>`_. |
| |
| Background on the pre-merge infrastructure can be found in `this 2020 DevMeeting |
| talk <https://llvm.org/devmtg/2020-09/slides/Goncharov-Pre-merge_checks.pdf>`_ |
| |
| Committing a change |
| ------------------- |
| |
| Once a patch has been reviewed and approved on Phabricator it can then be |
| committed to trunk. If you do not have commit access, someone has to |
| commit the change for you (with attribution). It is sufficient to add |
| a comment to the approved review indicating you cannot commit the patch |
| yourself. If you have commit access, there are multiple workflows to commit the |
| change. Whichever method you follow it is recommended that your commit message |
| ends with the line: |
| |
| :: |
| |
| Differential Revision: <URL> |
| |
| where ``<URL>`` is the URL for the code review, starting with |
| ``https://reviews.llvm.org/``. |
| |
| This allows people reading the version history to see the review for |
| context. This also allows Phabricator to detect the commit, close the |
| review, and add a link from the review to the commit. |
| |
| Note that if you use the Arcanist tool the ``Differential Revision`` line will |
| be added automatically. If you don't want to use Arcanist, you can add the |
| ``Differential Revision`` line (as the last line) to the commit message |
| yourself. |
| |
| Using the Arcanist tool can simplify the process of committing reviewed code as |
| it will retrieve reviewers, the ``Differential Revision``, etc from the review |
| and place it in the commit message. You may also commit an accepted change |
| directly using ``git push``, per the section in the :ref:`getting started |
| guide <commit_from_git>`. |
| |
| Note that if you commit the change without using Arcanist and forget to add the |
| ``Differential Revision`` line to your commit message then it is recommended |
| that you close the review manually. In the web UI, under "Leap Into Action" put |
| the git revision number in the Comment, set the Action to "Close Revision" and |
| click Submit. Note the review must have been Accepted first. |
| |
| Committing someone's change from Phabricator |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| |
| On a clean Git repository on an up to date ``main`` branch run the |
| following (where ``<Revision>`` is the Phabricator review number): |
| |
| :: |
| |
| arc patch D<Revision> |
| |
| |
| This will create a new branch called ``arcpatch-D<Revision>`` based on the |
| current ``main`` and will create a commit corresponding to ``D<Revision>`` with a |
| commit message derived from information in the Phabricator review. |
| |
| Check you are happy with the commit message and amend it if necessary. |
| For example, ensure the 'Author' property of the commit is set to the original author. |
| You can use a command to correct the author property if it is incorrect: |
| |
| :: |
| |
| git commit --amend --author="John Doe <jdoe@llvm.org>" |
| |
| Then, make sure the commit is up-to-date, and commit it. This can be done by running |
| the following: |
| |
| :: |
| |
| git pull --rebase https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git main |
| git show # Ensure the patch looks correct. |
| ninja check-$whatever # Rerun the appropriate tests if needed. |
| git push https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git HEAD:main |
| |
| |
| Abandoning a change |
| ------------------- |
| |
| If you decide you should not commit the patch, you should explicitly abandon |
| the review so that reviewers don't think it is still open. In the web UI, |
| scroll to the bottom of the page where normally you would enter an overall |
| comment. In the drop-down Action list, which defaults to "Comment," you should |
| select "Abandon Revision" and then enter a comment explaining why. Click the |
| Submit button to finish closing the review. |
| |
| Status |
| ------ |
| |
| Please let us know whether you like it and what could be improved! We're still |
| working on setting up a bug tracker, but you can email klimek-at-google-dot-com |
| and chandlerc-at-gmail-dot-com and CC the llvm-dev mailing list with questions |
| until then. We also could use help implementing improvements. This sadly is |
| really painful and hard because the Phabricator codebase is in PHP and not as |
| testable as you might like. However, we've put exactly what we're deploying up |
| on an `llvm-reviews GitHub project`_ where folks can hack on it and post pull |
| requests. We're looking into what the right long-term hosting for this is, but |
| note that it is a derivative of an existing open source project, and so not |
| trivially a good fit for an official LLVM project. |
| |
| .. _LLVM's Phabricator: https://reviews.llvm.org |
| .. _`https://reviews.llvm.org`: https://reviews.llvm.org |
| .. _Code Repository Browser: https://reviews.llvm.org/diffusion/ |
| .. _Arcanist Quick Start: https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabricator/article/arcanist_quick_start/ |
| .. _Arcanist User Guide: https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabricator/article/arcanist/ |
| .. _llvm-reviews GitHub project: https://github.com/r4nt/llvm-reviews/ |