safecode/tools/clang/www/analyzer/open_projects.html - llvm-archive - Git at Google

 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
           "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
 <html>
 <head>
   <title>Open Projects</title>
   <link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="menu.css">
   <link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="content.css">
   <script type="text/javascript" src="scripts/menu.js"></script>
 </head>
 <body>

 <div id="page">
 <!--#include virtual="menu.html.incl"-->
 <div id="content">

 <h1>Open Projects</h1>

 <p>This page lists several projects that would boost analyzer's usability and
 power. Most of the projects listed here are infrastructure-related so this list
 is an addition to the <a href="potential_checkers.html">potential checkers
 list</a>. If you are interested in tackling one of these, please send an email
 to the <a href=http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev>cfe-dev
 mailing list</a> to notify other members of the community.</p>

 <ul>
   <li>Core Analyzer Infrastructure
   <ul>
     <li>Explicitly model standard library functions with <tt>BodyFarm</tt>.
     <p><tt><a href="http://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1BodyFarm.html">BodyFarm</a></tt>
     allows the analyzer to explicitly model functions whose definitions are
     not available during analysis. Modeling more of the widely used functions
     (such as the members of <tt>std::string</tt>) will improve precision of the
     analysis.
     <i>(Difficulty: Easy)</i><p>
     </li>

     <li>Implement generalized loop execution modeling.
     <p>Currently, the analyzer simply unrolls each loop <tt>N</tt> times. This
     means that it will not execute any code after the loop if the loop is
     guaranteed to execute more than <tt>N</tt> times. This results in lost
     basic block coverage. We could continue exploring the path if we could
     model a generic <tt>i</tt>-th iteration of a loop.
     <i> (Difficulty: Hard)</i></p>
     </li>

     <li>Enhance CFG to model C++ temporaries properly.
     <p>There is an existing implementation of this, but it's not complete and
     is disabled in the analyzer.
     <i>(Difficulty: Medium)</i></p>

     <li>Enhance CFG to model exception-handling properly.
     <p>Currently exceptions are treated as "black holes", and exception-handling
     control structures are poorly modeled (to be conservative). This could be
     much improved for both C++ and Objective-C exceptions.
     <i>(Difficulty: Medium)</i></p>

     <li>Enhance CFG to model C++ <code>new</code> more precisely.
     <p>The current representation of <code>new</code> does not provide an easy
     way for the analyzer to model the call to a memory allocation function
     (<code>operator new</code>), then initialize the result with a constructor
     call. The problem is discussed at length in
     <a href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12014">PR12014</a>.
     <i>(Difficulty: Easy)</i></p>

     <li>Enhance CFG to model C++ <code>delete</code> more precisely.
     <p>Similarly, the representation of <code>delete</code> does not include
     the call to the destructor, followed by the call to the deallocation
     function (<code>operator delete</code>). One particular issue
     (<tt>noreturn</tt> destructors) is discussed in
     <a href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15599">PR15599</a>
     <i>(Difficulty: Easy)</i></p>

     <li>Track type info through casts more precisely.
     <p>The DynamicTypePropagation checker is in charge of inferring a region's
     dynamic type based on what operations the code is performing. Casts are a
     rich source of type information that the analyzer currently ignores. They
     are tricky to get right, but might have very useful consequences.
     <i>(Difficulty: Medium)</i></p>

     <li>Design and implement alpha-renaming.
     <p>Implement unifying two symbolic values along a path after they are
     determined to be equal via comparison. This would allow us to reduce the
     number of false positives and would be a building step to more advanced
     analyses, such as summary-based interprocedural and cross-translation-unit
     analysis.
     <i>(Difficulty: Hard)</i></p>
     </li>
   </ul>
   </li>

   <li>Bug Reporting
   <ul>
     <li>Add support for displaying cross-file diagnostic paths in HTML output
     (used by <tt>scan-build</tt>).
     <p>Currently <tt>scan-build</tt> output does not display reports that span
     multiple files. The main problem is that we do not have a good format to
     display such paths in HTML output. <i>(Difficulty: Medium)</i> </p>
     </li>

     <li>Relate bugs to checkers / "bug types"
     <p>We need to come up with an API which will relate bug reports
     to the checkers that produce them and refactor the existing code to use the
     new API. This would allow us to identify the checker from the bug report,
     which paves the way for selective control of certain checks.
     <i>(Difficulty: Easy-Medium)</i></p>
     </li>

     <li>Refactor path diagnostic generation in <a href="http://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/BugReporter_8cpp_source.html">BugReporter.cpp</a>.
     <p>It would be great to have more code reuse between "Minimal" and
     "Extensive" PathDiagnostic generation algorithms. One idea is to create an
     IR for representing path diagnostics, which would be later be used to
     generate minimal or extensive report output. <i>(Difficulty: Medium)</i></p>
     </li>
   </ul>
   </li>

   <li>Other Infrastructure
   <ul>
     <li>Rewrite <tt>scan-build</tt> (in Python).
     <p><i>(Difficulty: Easy)</i></p>
     </li>

     <li>Do a better job interposing on a compilation.
     <p>Currently, <tt>scan-build</tt> just sets the <tt>CC</tt> and <tt>CXX</tt>
     environment variables to its wrapper scripts, which then call into an
     underlying platform compiler. This is problematic for any project that
     doesn't exclusively use <tt>CC</tt> and <tt>CXX</tt> to control its
     compilers.
     <p><i>(Difficulty: Medium-Hard)</i></p>
     </li>

     <li>Create an <tt>analyzer_annotate</tt> attribute for the analyzer
     annotations.
     <p>We would like to put all analyzer attributes behind a fence so that we
     could add/remove them without worrying that compiler (not analyzer) users
     depend on them. Design and implement such a generic analyzer attribute in
     the compiler. <i>(Difficulty: Medium)</i></p>
     </li>
   </ul>
   </li>

   <li>Enhanced Checks
   <ul>
     <li>Implement a production-ready StreamChecker.
     <p>A SimpleStreamChecker has been presented in the Building a Checker in 24
     Hours talk
     (<a href="http://llvm.org/devmtg/2012-11/Zaks-Rose-Checker24Hours.pdf">slides</a>
     <a href="http://llvm.org/devmtg/2012-11/videos/Zaks-Rose-Checker24Hours.mp4">video</a>).
     We need to implement a production version of the checker with richer set of
     APIs and evaluate it by running on real codebases.
     <i>(Difficulty: Easy)</i></p>
     </li>

     <li>Extend Malloc checker with reasoning about custom allocator,
     deallocator, and ownership-transfer functions.
     <p>This would require extending the MallocPessimistic checker to reason
     about annotated functions. It is strongly desired that one would rely on
     the <tt>analyzer_annotate</tt> attribute, as described above.
     <i>(Difficulty: Easy)</i></p>
     </li>

     <li>Implement iterators invalidation checker.
     <p><i>(Difficulty: Easy)</i></p>
     </li>

     <li>Write checkers which catch Copy and Paste errors.
     <p>Take a look at the
     <a href="http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~shanlu/paper/TSE-CPMiner.pdf">CP-Miner</a>
     paper for inspiration.
     <i>(Difficulty: Medium-Hard)</i></p>
     </li>
   </ul>
   </li>
 </ul>

 </div>
 </div>
 </body>
 </html>
	<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
	"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
	<html>
	<head>
	<title>Open Projects</title>
	<link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="menu.css">
	<link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="content.css">
	<script type="text/javascript" src="scripts/menu.js"></script>
	</head>
	<body>

	<div id="page">
	<!--#include virtual="menu.html.incl"-->
	<div id="content">

	<h1>Open Projects</h1>

	<p>This page lists several projects that would boost analyzer's usability and
	power. Most of the projects listed here are infrastructure-related so this list
	is an addition to the <a href="potential_checkers.html">potential checkers
	list</a>. If you are interested in tackling one of these, please send an email
	to the <a href=http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev>cfe-dev
	mailing list</a> to notify other members of the community.</p>

	<ul>
	<li>Core Analyzer Infrastructure
	<ul>
	<li>Explicitly model standard library functions with <tt>BodyFarm</tt>.
	<p><tt><a href="http://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1BodyFarm.html">BodyFarm</a></tt>
	allows the analyzer to explicitly model functions whose definitions are
	not available during analysis. Modeling more of the widely used functions
	(such as the members of <tt>std::string</tt>) will improve precision of the
	analysis.
	<i>(Difficulty: Easy)</i><p>
	</li>

	<li>Implement generalized loop execution modeling.
	<p>Currently, the analyzer simply unrolls each loop <tt>N</tt> times. This
	means that it will not execute any code after the loop if the loop is
	guaranteed to execute more than <tt>N</tt> times. This results in lost
	basic block coverage. We could continue exploring the path if we could
	model a generic <tt>i</tt>-th iteration of a loop.
	<i> (Difficulty: Hard)</i></p>
	</li>

	<li>Enhance CFG to model C++ temporaries properly.
	<p>There is an existing implementation of this, but it's not complete and
	is disabled in the analyzer.
	<i>(Difficulty: Medium)</i></p>

	<li>Enhance CFG to model exception-handling properly.
	<p>Currently exceptions are treated as "black holes", and exception-handling
	control structures are poorly modeled (to be conservative). This could be
	much improved for both C++ and Objective-C exceptions.
	<i>(Difficulty: Medium)</i></p>

	<li>Enhance CFG to model C++ <code>new</code> more precisely.
	<p>The current representation of <code>new</code> does not provide an easy
	way for the analyzer to model the call to a memory allocation function
	(<code>operator new</code>), then initialize the result with a constructor
	call. The problem is discussed at length in
	<a href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12014">PR12014</a>.
	<i>(Difficulty: Easy)</i></p>

	<li>Enhance CFG to model C++ <code>delete</code> more precisely.
	<p>Similarly, the representation of <code>delete</code> does not include
	the call to the destructor, followed by the call to the deallocation
	function (<code>operator delete</code>). One particular issue
	(<tt>noreturn</tt> destructors) is discussed in
	<a href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15599">PR15599</a>
	<i>(Difficulty: Easy)</i></p>

	<li>Track type info through casts more precisely.
	<p>The DynamicTypePropagation checker is in charge of inferring a region's
	dynamic type based on what operations the code is performing. Casts are a
	rich source of type information that the analyzer currently ignores. They
	are tricky to get right, but might have very useful consequences.
	<i>(Difficulty: Medium)</i></p>

	<li>Design and implement alpha-renaming.
	<p>Implement unifying two symbolic values along a path after they are
	determined to be equal via comparison. This would allow us to reduce the
	number of false positives and would be a building step to more advanced
	analyses, such as summary-based interprocedural and cross-translation-unit
	analysis.
	<i>(Difficulty: Hard)</i></p>
	</li>
	</ul>
	</li>

	<li>Bug Reporting
	<ul>
	<li>Add support for displaying cross-file diagnostic paths in HTML output
	(used by <tt>scan-build</tt>).
	<p>Currently <tt>scan-build</tt> output does not display reports that span
	multiple files. The main problem is that we do not have a good format to
	display such paths in HTML output. <i>(Difficulty: Medium)</i> </p>
	</li>

	<li>Relate bugs to checkers / "bug types"
	<p>We need to come up with an API which will relate bug reports
	to the checkers that produce them and refactor the existing code to use the
	new API. This would allow us to identify the checker from the bug report,
	which paves the way for selective control of certain checks.
	<i>(Difficulty: Easy-Medium)</i></p>
	</li>

	<li>Refactor path diagnostic generation in <a href="http://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/BugReporter_8cpp_source.html">BugReporter.cpp</a>.
	<p>It would be great to have more code reuse between "Minimal" and
	"Extensive" PathDiagnostic generation algorithms. One idea is to create an
	IR for representing path diagnostics, which would be later be used to
	generate minimal or extensive report output. <i>(Difficulty: Medium)</i></p>
	</li>
	</ul>
	</li>

	<li>Other Infrastructure
	<ul>
	<li>Rewrite <tt>scan-build</tt> (in Python).
	<p><i>(Difficulty: Easy)</i></p>
	</li>

	<li>Do a better job interposing on a compilation.
	<p>Currently, <tt>scan-build</tt> just sets the <tt>CC</tt> and <tt>CXX</tt>
	environment variables to its wrapper scripts, which then call into an
	underlying platform compiler. This is problematic for any project that
	doesn't exclusively use <tt>CC</tt> and <tt>CXX</tt> to control its
	compilers.
	<p><i>(Difficulty: Medium-Hard)</i></p>
	</li>

	<li>Create an <tt>analyzer_annotate</tt> attribute for the analyzer
	annotations.
	<p>We would like to put all analyzer attributes behind a fence so that we
	could add/remove them without worrying that compiler (not analyzer) users
	depend on them. Design and implement such a generic analyzer attribute in
	the compiler. <i>(Difficulty: Medium)</i></p>
	</li>
	</ul>
	</li>

	<li>Enhanced Checks
	<ul>
	<li>Implement a production-ready StreamChecker.
	<p>A SimpleStreamChecker has been presented in the Building a Checker in 24
	Hours talk
	(<a href="http://llvm.org/devmtg/2012-11/Zaks-Rose-Checker24Hours.pdf">slides</a>
	<a href="http://llvm.org/devmtg/2012-11/videos/Zaks-Rose-Checker24Hours.mp4">video</a>).
	We need to implement a production version of the checker with richer set of
	APIs and evaluate it by running on real codebases.
	<i>(Difficulty: Easy)</i></p>
	</li>

	<li>Extend Malloc checker with reasoning about custom allocator,
	deallocator, and ownership-transfer functions.
	<p>This would require extending the MallocPessimistic checker to reason
	about annotated functions. It is strongly desired that one would rely on
	the <tt>analyzer_annotate</tt> attribute, as described above.
	<i>(Difficulty: Easy)</i></p>
	</li>

	<li>Implement iterators invalidation checker.
	<p><i>(Difficulty: Easy)</i></p>
	</li>

	<li>Write checkers which catch Copy and Paste errors.
	<p>Take a look at the
	<a href="http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~shanlu/paper/TSE-CPMiner.pdf">CP-Miner</a>
	paper for inspiration.
	<i>(Difficulty: Medium-Hard)</i></p>
	</li>
	</ul>
	</li>
	</ul>

	</div>
	</div>
	</body>
	</html>