llvm /
clang /
1b1167f58f9cf653947777493c0fc4fbbaa103c5 Recommit "[Clang] Pragma vectorize_width() implies vectorize(enable)"
This was further discussed at the llvm dev list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-October/135602.html
I think the brief summary of that is that this change is an improvement,
this is the behaviour that we expect and promise in ours docs, and also
as a result there are cases where we now emit diagnostics whereas before
pragmas were silently ignored. Two areas where we can improve: 1) the
diagnostic message itself, and 2) and in some cases (e.g. -Os and -Oz)
the vectoriser is (quite understandably) not triggering.
Original commit message:
Specifying the vectorization width was supposed to implicitly enable
vectorization, except that it wasn't really doing this. It was only
setting the vectorize.width metadata, but not vectorize.enable.
This should fix PR27643.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@374288 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
3 files changed
